06/04/2025
As usual when I respond to things like this, my purpose is not to shame the person who posted it, but to point out things from which we can learn.
The commenter apparently blocked me after leaving this message, so won’t see this anyway. That’s not the point.
1. A surprising number of people who post anti-LGBTQIA+ material, and specifically anti-transgender material have pages full of “love and light” and “spread joy and happiness” content. Their message of positivity doesn’t appear to extend to people like me.
This commenter is no different, and is also a therapist, a life coach, a meditation teacher, and author of a book on happiness!
I genuinely don’t know what to make of this, but I’m not the first person to notice a disturbing connection between far-right and New Age philosophies. If you want to delve deeper, I highly recommend a book and podcast titled Conspirituality.
2. The commenter believes that it’s possible to “convince” people to become gay or trans; that people’s gender and sexuality are choices we make.
Look, given the sheer diversity of humanity, I’m sure that this is sometimes true. But it’s not the general experience of humans. (And I know plenty of straight women who wish it were otherwise...! 😉)
What would that look like anyway? I cannot fathom what it would take to convince a person to make such a change. I am left wondering what the commenter thinks it would take to convince them to change their gender identity or sexuality?
3. The commenter also believes that I (and possibly other people who belong to a gender or sexual minority) are interested in “converting“ others to be like us.
This seems to be a fairly common belief in some far-right circles, and one that I put down to a fairly clear-cut case of projection. That is, people who hold far-right beliefs are typically very concerned about the sexuality and gender identity of others, and assume that everyone else is similarly concerned.
Conversely, though, I find the whole idea of wanting to police or change somebody else’s sexuality or gender identity weird and creepy. It’s nobody’s business but that person’s!
4. Finally, implicit in this comment is the idea that it’s somehow better to be heterosexual and cisgender* than not.
Otherwise, if it were even possible to change somebody’s gender identity or sexuality, and if I or anybody else were remotely interested in doing so, then why would this be a problem?
5. I am deeply honoured and grateful for the recognition awarded to me by The Women Changing the World in London last week, and this comment is an example of why this work is still unfortunately necessary.
Because although I have no interest in changing anybody’s gender identity or sexuality, I am very much committed to creating a world in which it is safer for people to express their gender expression and sexuality authentically, whatever it may be.
And I believe that this positive change comes from education and connection. Hence this post.
----
* cisgender = the gender roles and norms by which you live your life line up with those you were assigned at birth. The opposite of transgender.