01/05/2026
This needs to be said—openly and honestly.
From a Support Coordination perspective, and as Australian citizens, we are watching a narrative unfold around the National Disability Insurance Scheme that is creating division, stigma, and fear.
The current focus on “fraud,” “cost,” and “sustainability” is dominating the conversation.Yes—integrity matters. Yes—accountability matters.
But the suggestion that widespread misuse is the norm is simply not what we see on the ground.
What we see is:• Families stretching every dollar to make supports work• Carers carrying 24/7 responsibility with little recognition• Participants trying to live ordinary, meaningful lives
Most people are doing the right thing.
And yet, the public narrative continues to position people with disability as a burden—framed through “taxpayer money,” as if they are separate from the very community that funds and sustains this country.
Let’s challenge that.
People with disability are not separate from taxpayers—they are part of them.Many contribute directly. Families contribute every day. And unpaid care saves the government billions.
The NDIS is not a handout. It is public infrastructure—like health and education. It exists so Australians can live, participate, and contribute.
If we are serious about how public money is used, then we need to look at the full picture.
We need to question the significant resources spent through the National Disability Insurance Agency on legal processes and disputes within the Administrative Appeals Tribunal—often forcing people to fight for basic, reasonable supports—instead of directing those funds where they were always intended: supporting people.
We can hold two truths at once:✔ Safeguards and integrity matter✔ But most people are doing the right thing
And we need to be careful not to let one narrative erase the other.
At the same time, we are seeing proposals to reduce or remove Support Coordination and replace it with “navigators.”
Let’s be honest about that too.
If “navigators” become a centralised, call-centre style model, they will not replace what is actually happening on the ground.
Support is not just information.
Real support involves:• Understanding complexity and risk• Building trusted relationships over time• Local knowledge and real-time problem solving• Advocacy when systems fail
You cannot build trust through short, scripted interactions.You cannot coordinate complex human support from a distance.
If we remove relational support and replace it with transactional models, the responsibility does not disappear—it shifts.
It shifts back onto:• Families• Carers• People with disability themselves
We have seen this pattern before.
The original intent of community connection—through Partners in the Community—was meant to provide that local, relational support. Where that hasn’t worked as intended, the gap didn’t disappear. It was absorbed by Support Coordinators and families.
There is another part of this conversation that cannot be ignored.
We are now hearing increasing discussion about limiting providers to a smaller number of “approved” or “preferred” organisations.
On the surface, this is being framed as quality and control.
But we need to ask—at what cost?
Because many of us remember what systems looked like before individualised funding:• Limited choice• A small number of organisations controlling supports• Funding tied to providers—not people
We remember block funding.We remember the lack of voice.And many remember the very real risks—abuse, neglect, and people having little control over their own lives.
The NDIS was designed to move away from that.
It was built on:✔ Choice and control✔ Individualised funding✔ The right to decide who provides your support
If we begin restricting providers to a select few, we risk shifting power away from individuals and back toward systems.
This is a system issue.
And now we need to talk about accountability.
The NDIS has evolved under multiple governments. No one side can claim success while blaming others for its failures.
But what is happening right now matters.
Decisions being made today—based on fear-driven narratives and political pressure—will shape who gets support and who doesn’t.
And when those decisions land, it is not governments who carry the consequences.
It is:• People with disability• Families• Carers
So let’s stop.
Stop blaming providers.Stop blaming Support Coordinators.Stop blaming Plan Managers.Stop blaming people with disability.
And start asking harder questions of the systems and governments—past and present—that designed, implemented, and continue to reshape this scheme without always understanding the reality of the lives it impacts.
This is not about defending roles.
This is about defending people.
We need:✔ Honest conversations, not fear-based narratives✔ Accountability across all levels—not selective blame✔ Systems that reflect real life—not just policy design✔ Recognition that this scheme depends on the very people being questioned
Because if we continue down a path of division and misinformation, we don’t just damage a scheme—we damage the lives of Australians who rely on it.
This is about people.And it always has been.