01/04/2026
A bit of a practitioner perspective here — and yes, a level of frustration that’s been building over time.
If you have an interest in endometriosis, or you’ve been told there are limited options, this is worth reading.
How many people know that acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine have been used by many women navigating endometriosis, many with very positive outcomes?
Gosh I wish I could shout from the rooftops what I’ve witnessed in clinic over the past 15 years — from observing my Sensei’s results, trusted colleagues results, to my own clinical outcomes.
It is frustrating to watch the mainstream narrative stay fixed, when there are clearly other approaches that support many women.
We are governed in a way where we must be very careful about what we can and cannot say around diagnosed conditions.
Most women with endometriosis are told there is no cure — that it must be managed long term.
But Chinese medicine looks at this differently.
It doesn’t treat a diagnosis.
It treats what is happening in the body.
Stagnation.
Cold.
Blood not moving as it should.
Depletion over time.
These are patterns — and patterns can change.
In clinic, when women commit to a consistent course of care, often once weekly over a few cycles (months), I regularly see meaningful shifts in how their body functions and how they experience their cycle.
Not every case is the same, and some require ongoing (maybe once a month) maintenance support — but it is not accurate to say there is nothing that can be done.
Just to note, outcomes in this medicine are highly dependent on the skill of the practitioner — and this may be one of the reasons acupuncture is not more widely recognised in its full capacity.
In the classical texts, including the Huangdi Neijing, there is a clear distinction between levels of practitioners — those who understand the root, and those who treat only what is obvious.
It is said that the superior physician recognises imbalance before it fully manifests, while others may only respond once symptoms are established.
This reflects depth of training, clinical experience, and refinement over time.
Because Chinese medicine is not a one-size-fits-all system. It relies on accurate pattern differentiation, subtle observation, and the ability to adjust treatment as the body changes.
Two practitioners can treat the same person and achieve very different outcomes.
Which is why who you work with matters.
A practitioner grounded in classical training, lineage, and years of clinical experience brings a level of precision that can significantly influence how the body responds.
Access to the depth of this medicine — particularly its classical and lineage-based roots — is not always easy to come by. Many practitioners are trained through modern university systems and may not be exposed to the full scope of the classical teachings or the refinement that comes through lineage and long-term clinical mentorship.
This is not a criticism — it’s a reflection of how the medicine is currently taught and understood, particularly in places like Australia.
So this depth matters. Really research into who you work with. A classically trained acupuncturist, shaped by lineage and hands-on learning from experienced practitioners who is continually devoted to studying the depth of the medicine (because this does not end), brings a very different level of understanding to your care.
Because when pattern differentiation is accurate and herbal medicine is correct, the body has a far greater capacity to respond.
This post is about widening the lens — because when the conversation stays narrow, so do the options.
If you have any questions or experiences to note please open the conversation, its needed so desperately x