https://newsiconstudios.com/insideout-plantbase, https://form.fillout.com/t/vdQG8bFdPQus, http://www.insideoutplantbase.

Inside out plant base, Sunshine Coast (2026)

03/03/2026

🫒 WHAT’S ON YOUR PLATE?

The Oil You’re Cooking With.

Let me make this personal.

I love olive oil.

I use it:
• On my salads
• In my hummus
• Drizzled over sourdough
• Shallow frying tofu
• Roasting vegetables
• Finishing soups

It’s one of the most versatile ingredients in my kitchen.

But here’s the issue…

You walk into Woolworths or Coles and you’re hit with:
“Light olive oil”
“Pure olive oil”
“Extra light”
“Imported blend”
“Cold pressed”
“First pressed”

It’s confusing.

So let’s simplify it.

⸻

🟢 If You’re Buying Olive Oil — This Is What To Look For:

✔ It must say EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL
✔ Dark glass bottle
✔ Harvest date (fresh matters)
✔ Australian certification if possible
✔ Avoid vague “olive oil blend” wording

If it just says “olive oil” or “light olive oil,” it’s usually refined.

Refined doesn’t mean toxic — it just means stripped of antioxidants and flavour.

⸻

🏷 Brands I Personally Use or Trust in Australia

To make it easier — here are a few consistent, quality options you’ll find locally:

• Cobram Estate (EVOO range) – widely regarded, Australian grown, strong quality control.
• Mount Zero Extra Virgin Olive Oil – excellent flavour and freshness.
• Coringa / Coriole / high-quality single estate Australian EVOOs – smaller producers often deliver beautiful fresh oil.

(There are others — but these are reliable starting points.)

Fresh Australian oils generally outperform long-imported blends sitting on shelves for months.

⸻

🔥 Can You Cook With Extra Virgin Olive Oil?

Yes.

EVOO:
• Rich in monounsaturated fats
• Relatively heat stable
• Does NOT turn into trans fat when used properly
• Safe for sautéing, roasting and shallow frying

I shallow fry tofu in it regularly.

The key?
Don’t heat it until it’s smoking.

Any oil overheated repeatedly degrades — that’s not an olive oil issue, that’s a temperature issue.

⸻

🥗 Best Uses

Extra Virgin Olive Oil:
• Salads
• Dips
• Hummus
• Legumes
• Finishing vegetables
• Sourdough soak

Refined olive oil or avocado oil:
• Higher heat cooking
• Repeated pan use

⸻

❌ What Not To Do

🚫 Don’t reuse burnt oil
🚫 Don’t store oil beside the stove
🚫 Don’t buy huge cheap bottles that sit for months
🚫 Don’t assume “light” means healthier

“Light” refers to refinement — not calories.

⸻

🧠 Why This Matters

Oil isn’t evil.

Quality matters.
Processing matters.
Freshness matters.

Extra virgin olive oil is part of one of the most researched dietary patterns in the world — the Mediterranean-style approach — associated with cardiovascular health and longevity.

The problem isn’t olive oil.

It’s supermarket confusion.

⸻

So next time you’re standing in the oil aisle…

Ask yourself:

WHAT’S ON YOUR PLATE?

Fresh, antioxidant-rich extra virgin olive oil?

Or something heavily processed and stripped back?

Small daily decisions.
Long-term impact.

—

Peter Trainer
InsideOut Plant-Based™
“Who Taught You How To Eat?”

⸻

🔎 This content is research-informed and cross-checked against nutritional science and food standards.
🤖 AI is used as a research and synthesis tool — not as a shortcut.
📚 Information shared here reflects years of studying evidence-based nutrition.
No fear. No fluff. Just clarity.

02/03/2026

NO ANIMAL PRODUCTS PLEASE.
PLANT-BASED ONLY. 🫣

If it sounds ridiculous when it’s your own skin on the plate…😵‍💫
maybe it’s time to rethink what we call “food.”😉

01/03/2026

🧪 Still waiting for the study showing meat reverses chronic disease…

You’d think by now we would have at least one large, well-designed clinical trial showing that eating more red meat reverses heart disease. Or type 2 diabetes. Or atherosclerosis.

But here’s the reality:

We don’t.

What we do have is decades of peer-reviewed evidence linking high intake of red and processed meat with increased risk of:

• Cardiovascular disease
• Type 2 diabetes
• Certain cancers (especially colorectal)
• All-cause mortality

This isn’t coming from “vegan blogs.”

It comes from major scientific and medical bodies including:

– The World Health Organization (IARC classification of processed meat as carcinogenic)
– Harvard School of Public Health
– The American Heart Association
– The World Cancer Research Fund
– The National Academy of Sciences

Meanwhile, interventional trials have demonstrated regression of coronary artery disease using intensive lifestyle programs centered around whole-food, plant-predominant dietary patterns (e.g., Dean Ornish, Caldwell Esselstyn).

That doesn’t mean every person who eats meat gets sick.
It doesn’t mean meat is “poison.”
It means the burden of proof matters.

If someone claims meat reverses chronic disease, the evidence should exist.

In science, we don’t wait for beliefs to be validated.
We look at outcomes.

So here’s a simple question:

If meat reverses disease…
Where’s the clinical trial?

👇 Genuine discussion welcome.

—

📚 Evidence-based nutrition.
🧠 Critical thinking over marketing.
🌱 Long-term health over short-term trends.

Who Taught You How To Eat?

—

AI-assisted research synthesis used to compile evidence references. Sources include WHO, AHA, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, peer-reviewed cardiovascular intervention trials, and global cancer research bodies.

26/02/2026

🥣 POST-WORKOUT FUEL. Not Powder. Not Bars. Not Hype.

Tonight’s dinner:

Organic lentils.
Sweet potato.
Baby potatoes.
Carrots.
Red capsicum (yes, the good stuff).
Green beans.
Cauliflower.
Broccoli.
Spinach.
Turmeric. Black pepper.
Vegetable stock.
Nutritional yeast.
H**p seeds.
Sesame seeds.
Nori.

Served with a slice of proper sourdough.

Light. Warm. Protein-rich. Zero junk.

⸻

🥣 INSIDEOUT LENTIL RECOVERY SOUP

Ingredients
• 1 cup organic lentils (rinsed)
• 1 medium sweet potato (cubed)
• 2–3 baby potatoes (cubed)
• 1 carrot (sliced)
• ½–1 red capsicum (chopped)
• Handful green beans (chopped)
• Small florets cauliflower & broccoli
• 2 big handfuls spinach
• 1–1.5L vegetable stock
• 1 tsp turmeric
• Black pepper
• Himalayan salt (to taste)
• Sprinkle Vegeta (optional)
• 1–2 tbsp nutritional yeast
• 1 tbsp h**p seeds
• 1 tbsp sesame seeds
• Nori flakes (to finish)

⸻

Method
1. Add lentils, sweet potato, baby potatoes, carrot, turmeric and stock to a pot.
2. Simmer until potatoes are just cooked through.
3. Add red capsicum, beans, cauliflower and broccoli. Cook briefly — keep colour and texture.
4. Turn off heat. Stir through spinach, nutritional yeast and h**p seeds.
5. Season with salt, black pepper and a little Vegeta if you like.
6. Serve topped with sesame seeds and nori flakes.

Add sourdough on the side. Done.

⸻

💪 Why This Works (Not Just “Vegan”, Actually Smart)

✔ 20–25g+ plant protein
✔ Iron (lentils + spinach)
✔ Vitamin C from red capsicum to boost iron absorption
✔ Omega-3 (h**p)
✔ Calcium (sesame + greens)
✔ Iodine (nori)
✔ Anti-inflammatory support (turmeric + black pepper)
✔ High fibre for gut recovery

This isn’t “light” because it’s lacking.
It’s light because it’s efficient.

You finish training → you rebuild → you move on with your day.

No heaviness.
No inflammation hit.
No cholesterol load.

Just plants doing their job.

25/02/2026

🇦🇺 What’s Really Shaping Australia’s Food Guidelines in 2026?

Before we argue about meat vs plants…
let’s ask a better question.

Who actually weighs in when national dietary advice is written? ⚖️

Australia’s official dietary advice still comes from the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines and the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating plate.

Yes — 2013.

The plate hasn’t changed yet.

But behind the scenes, a full review is underway.

Here’s where we really are in 2026.

⸻

📍 Where Things Stand

The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) is currently rewriting the guidelines.

Target release: 2026.

The process includes:

• Updated systematic reviews of nutrition science
• Assessment of whole dietary patterns
• Consideration of ultra-processed foods
• Review of protein-rich foods
• Sustainability analysis
• Public consultation before finalisation

There is no new official plate yet.
The 2013 plate remains active until the revised guidelines are complete.

That’s why the “new plate” people expected years ago never appeared.

⸻

🧠 The Direction of the Science

From official review documents and public priorities, the shift is clear:

• Stronger emphasis on whole dietary patterns
• Diets built on vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds
• Reduced ultra-processed foods
• Continued concern around saturated fat and added sugars
• Sustainability now formally within scope

This does not mean “vegan only.”

But it does mean plant-forward patterns are strongly supported by current evidence.

⸻

⚖️ Where the Tension Sits

There has been visible push-back from:

• Red meat industry bodies
• Agribusiness groups
• Some food manufacturing sectors

The argument from those groups:
“Stick to nutrition. Leave sustainability out.”

Meanwhile, public health researchers argue that sustainability and long-term health are linked.

That tension is real.

And it’s happening now.

⸻

🛡️ Safeguards in the Process

The NHMRC review includes:

• Formal conflict-of-interest declarations
• A Governance Committee overseeing risk management
• Structured evidence-to-decision frameworks
• Transparent documentation
• Public consultation

It’s not flawless.

But it is more structured and transparent than older processes.

That matters.

⸻

🌍 How Australia Compares

🇨🇦 Canada (2019):
Clear plant-centred messaging, protein grouped broadly, sustainability embedded.

🇺🇸 United States:
Criticised for softer language around red meat and ultra-processed foods, with more visible industry pressure.

🇦🇺 Australia (2026 revision):
Moving plant-forward, sustainability-aware, but navigating a politically sensitive food economy.

⸻

The real debate now isn’t whether plant-centred dietary patterns improve health.

That’s well supported.

The real question is:

How clearly will the final 2026 guidelines reflect that evidence —
especially around red meat, ultra-processed food and environmental impact?

That’s what we’re watching. 🌱

—

Who taught you how to eat?

⸻

Sources

• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) – Dietary Guidelines Review (2026 process)
• Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (2013) – Eat for Health
• NHMRC Governance & Conflict of Interest Framework
• Public consultation documents
• Australian health and sustainability policy documents
• ABC News and public health commentary on red meat & sustainability debates

(All publicly available government and academic sources.)

⸻

InsideOut Plant-Based™
Evidence first. Always.
No marketing spin. No ideology. Just data.

⸻

24/02/2026

WHEN PROFIT WRITES THE FOOD RULES

Alright… let’s stop pretending these food pyramids and plates just fall out of the sky wrapped in “pure science.”

They don’t.

They sit on top of multi-billion dollar industries.

We’ve just watched the U.S. drop its latest 2025–2030 dietary guidance and immediately face criticism — not from random internet pages — but from journalists, policy analysts and public health voices raising concerns about industry ties and mixed messaging around animal foods.

This isn’t new.

Peer-reviewed research has documented conflicts of interest within past Dietary Guidelines advisory processes in the U.S.

Policy scholars like Marion Nestle have written extensively about how food industries lobby hard when guidelines threaten sales.

Investigative health reporting (STAT News, 2026) has questioned financial ties linked to advisory panels.

So when meat and dairy are elevated in a national model, people are allowed to ask:

Who benefits?

Now let’s bring it home.

Australia’s current official dietary guidelines are still the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines (NHMRC). The review process is underway, with updated guidance scheduled for 2026.

NHMRC has confirmed sustainability is part of the review process.

ABC Rural has reported red meat industry concerns about environmental considerations being included.

Dietitians Australia has publicly stated that healthy and sustainable diets should be considered together.

So this isn’t fringe stuff.

It’s happening in plain sight.

Here’s the uncomfortable part:

Industry markets what it can sell.
Governments get pressured when profit is threatened.
And consumers vote with their wallets every single day.

Marketing and branding absolutely play a role — but the engine behind it is money.

If you want to understand nutrition policy, follow the incentives.

Next post:
We’ll look at Australia’s current 2013 plate versus where the 2026 update may head — and how other countries have already shifted toward more plant-forward models.

—

For the “AI blah blah blah” crowd:

AI is used here as a research and synthesis tool.
Sources referenced above include:
• Peer-reviewed conflict-of-interest research (U.S. Dietary Guidelines advisory processes)
• STAT News health policy reporting (2026)
• NHMRC official review updates
• ABC Rural reporting on guideline review
• Dietitians Australia position statements on sustainable diets

Everything mentioned is publicly verifiable.

—

InsideOut
Who Taught You How To Eat?

Educational discussion based on publicly available policy documents, peer-reviewed literature and mainstream health reporting. Always consult qualified health professionals for personal medical advice.

20/02/2026

“I WOULD NEVER KISS A MEAT EATER… THEY STINK.”

This popped up in a convo with a few girls talking about dating.

Some were like:
“Absolutely not. Never.”
Others were like:
“Maybe… as long as they don’t bring it into the kitchen.”

But one comment stopped me:

“I would never kiss a carnivore. They stink.”

And it made me think…

Is that just opinion… or has anyone actually studied this?

So of course I did what I do.
I went digging for the truth. 😂

⸻

🧪 WHAT I FOUND (THE ONLY REAL CONTROLLED TRIAL I COULD FIND)

There is an actual study that tested diet and body odour using worn shirts:

Havlíček & Lenochová (2006)
“The effect of meat consumption on body odor attractiveness” (Chemical Senses)

In a controlled crossover design, men went through a meat phase and a non-meat phase. Women rated the smell from worn T-shirts.

Result:

During the non-meat phase, the odour was rated:
✅ more pleasant
✅ less intense
✅ more attractive

That doesn’t mean “all meat eaters stink.”
But it does suggest diet can influence scent chemistry.

⸻

👃 WHY THIS COULD MAKE SENSE (NO FLUFF)

Body odour isn’t just sweat.

It’s sweat + skin bacteria + internal metabolites (what your body is processing).

Change the inputs (diet)… and you can change the scent profile.

That’s the basic science reality.

⸻

💬 WHAT I ALSO NOTICED ONLINE

I couldn’t believe how many people have had this exact conversation — especially around kissing / breath / taste.

A few examples (not saying I agree with every word — just showing the convo exists):

• “Kissing Non-Vegans? Am I being too extreme?” (r/vegan)
• “I don’t know if I could kiss someone right after a meal if they ate non-vegan…” (r/vegan)
• VeggieBoards thread: “Could you ever date or marry a meat eater?” (includes “I’d never kiss him…”)
• Plant Based News Facebook comment thread (people arguing both sides)
• “Would you ever date a non-vegan? Would you be okay with kissing them?” (r/vegan)

So clearly, it’s not just “in my head” — people notice smell/taste differences and react strongly.

⸻

✅ MY QUESTION (NO BULLSH*T)

For the plant-based women and guys out there:

Have you noticed a difference in breath / kissing / body odour depending on what someone eats?

Not morals. Not politics.
Just… the actual scent.

Drop your honest experience 👇

⸻

📚 SOURCES (for the science part)

• Havlíček, J., & Lenochová, P. (2006). The effect of meat consumption on body odor attractiveness. Chemical Senses.

⸻

🌱 INSIDEOUT PLANT-BASED™ | WHO TAUGHT YOU HOW TO EAT?

This page explores food, biology, culture — and the questions most people never think to ask.
AI-assisted research + evidence-led discussion for education (not medical advice).
Always check primary sources and talk to qualified professionals for personal health decisions.

20/02/2026

🇺🇸 ANOTHER EMBARRASSING MOMENT IN NUTRITION POLICY?

The newly released U.S. 2025–2030 dietary pyramid has placed red meat and full-fat dairy prominently at the top tier of “healthy protein.”

And the response from many nutrition scientists has been… uncomfortable.

Let’s be clear.

This isn’t about ideology.
It’s about evidence.

For decades, major cardiovascular and public health bodies have warned that:

• High intake of red and processed meats is linked to increased heart disease risk
• Diets high in saturated fat raise LDL cholesterol — a causal factor in atherosclerosis
• Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic disease are strongly tied to high-calorie, high-animal-fat dietary patterns
• Diets rich in legumes, whole grains, vegetables and plant proteins are consistently associated with longer life expectancy and reduced chronic disease

That’s not fringe science. That’s mainstream epidemiology.

Yet the new visual messaging appears to elevate animal protein in a way many academic experts say conflicts with long-standing evidence.

Cardiology associations still recommend limiting saturated fat.
Public health researchers still advocate plant-forward patterns.
Environmental scientists continue to point out that livestock production is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation.

And sustainability?
It’s not meaningfully integrated into the pyramid at all.

So professionals are asking:

Why promote higher animal intake without equally clear warnings about cardiovascular risk?

Why ignore the environmental cost in a time of accelerating climate pressure?

Why visually position foods in a way that appears to contradict decades of prevention science?

This is why some researchers are calling it confusing.
Some are calling it regressive.
And others are quietly calling it political.

Reducing ultra-processed food? Strong consensus.
Cutting added sugar? Strong consensus.
Whole food emphasis? Strong consensus.

But red meat and full-fat dairy as a prominent “healthy” signal?

That’s where the scientific discomfort begins.

Public dietary guidelines shape:
School lunches
Federal food programs
Healthcare advice
Public perception

They matter.

And when they appear to move backward from prevention-focused nutrition science, professionals notice.

This isn’t anti-America.
It’s pro-evidence.

Next post, as promised — we’ll look at how other countries are updating their dietary models around the world.

Because the global direction of travel may surprise you.

—

InsideOut
Who Taught You How To Eat?

Educational content based on current peer-reviewed nutrition research and public health consensus. AI used as a research synthesis tool. Always consult qualified health professionals for medical advice.

19/02/2026

🚨 NEWS: You’re Not Buying Supplements. You’re Buying A Story.

Over the years — competing in bodybuilding and martial arts — I’ve tested just about everything.

When you train at a high level, supplementation becomes part of the conversation.

One product we once tested was marketed as a “herbal steroid.”
Edge. Power. Lean muscle. 🔥

When it was independently analysed?

It wasn’t even as potent as a basic multivitamin.

That moment taught me something I’ve never forgotten:

Brand is easy.
Product is hard.

And if the product isn’t right, the brand is just theatre.

⸻

🎯 This Series Is a Marketing Exercise

Over the past week I’ve deliberately stripped things back — cosmetics, food, supplements — so you can see the mechanics behind the messaging.

Because here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Most adults were never taught how marketing works.

We were raised on stories.

🐰 The Easter Bunny
🎅 Father Christmas
🦷 The Tooth Fairy
🐄 “Happy cows”
💊 “Clinically proven miracles”

The structure never changes.

Create a narrative.
Attach emotion.
Add authority language.
Repeat it enough.

Belief follows.

That’s branding.

⸻

💊 The Supplement Formula

Look at any ad:

💪 Stronger muscles
💇 Better hair
⚡ More energy
🔥 Fat shredding
🧠 Mental clarity
🧬 Longevity

Step 1: Identify insecurity.
Step 2: Promise optimisation.
Step 3: Add science language.
Step 4: Show transformation.

That’s not nutrition.

That’s psychology.

⸻

🔬 The Reality (2026 Science)

Some supplements make sense — in context:

✔ B12 – If intake or absorption is inadequate. (Modern livestock are often supplemented too.)
✔ Vitamin D – Commonly low. Test first.
✔ Iron – Only if bloodwork confirms deficiency.
✔ Magnesium – Useful if intake is low or in specific cases. Not universal.
✔ Creatine – One of the most researched performance supplements.
✔ Omega-3 – Context dependent. Not a miracle cure.

Notice the pattern?

They solve specific problems.

They are not lifestyle replacements.

⸻

🧠 Product First. Brand Second.

As someone who works in branding and advertising, I’ll tell you something important:

A real brand isn’t built from hype.

It’s built from a brilliant product.

When the product is strong, the brand grows naturally.

When the product is weak, the marketing has to shout louder.

That’s when fairy tales start appearing.

When the product is built strong, there’s no need for branding to sell fairy tales.
The product speaks for itself.

⸻

This isn’t anti-supplement.
It’s anti-manipulation.

Once you understand persuasion, you stop reacting emotionally.

You start asking better questions.

And once you see the pattern…

You can’t unsee it.

If this is your first time reading this series, scroll down and read the others. 📖👇

⸻

🌱 InsideOut
Who Taught You How To Eat?

This content is created using AI as a research and synthesis tool.
Encouraging evidence-based thinking and critical analysis — not blind belief.

⸻

#️⃣
#️⃣
#️⃣
#️⃣
#️⃣
#️⃣
#️⃣
#️⃣

18/02/2026

NEWS: PRODUCT FIRST. BRAND SECOND. (The Supplement Illusion)

⸻

Over the years — competing in bodybuilding and martial arts — I’ve tested just about everything.

When you train at a high level, supplementation becomes part of the conversation.

One product we once tested was marketed as a “herbal steroid.”
Edge. Power. Lean muscle.
Sounded incredible.

When it was independently analysed?

It wasn’t even as potent as a basic multivitamin.

That moment taught me something I’ve never forgotten:

Brand is easy.
Product is hard.

And if the product isn’t right, the brand is just theatre.

⸻

🎯 This Post Isn’t Anti-Supplement

It’s anti-manipulation.

The supplement industry is worth hundreds of billions globally.
But most people don’t know the difference between:

• A nutrient deficiency
• A performance enhancer
• A medically useful compound
• A branded placebo

That confusion?
That’s marketing.

⸻

🔬 Let’s Talk Reality (2026 Science)

Some supplements make sense — in the right context.

✔ Vitamin B12 – Required if intake or absorption is inadequate.
(B12 is produced by bacteria — and modern livestock are often supplemented. Many omnivores are low too.)

✔ Vitamin D – Commonly low. Test before supplementing.

✔ Iron – Only if bloodwork confirms deficiency.

✔ Magnesium – Can be useful if intake is low or in specific conditions. Not universally required.

✔ Creatine – One of the most researched performance supplements available.

✔ Omega-3 – Context dependent. Useful in some cardiovascular cases. Not a miracle cure.

Notice something?

They solve specific problems.

They are not lifestyle replacements.

⸻

🚩 Red Flags I’ve Learned To Spot

• “Proprietary blend” (hidden dosages)
• 10–15 ingredients at ineffective levels
• Influencer testimonials instead of data
• Buzzwords like detox, shred, hormonal reset
• Before/after photos doing the heavy lifting
• “Clinically proven” without dose transparency

It’s the same psychology used everywhere.

If the product isn’t strong enough to stand alone…

The brand has to shout louder.

⸻

🧠 Food First Still Wins

Most healthy people need:

• Whole food
• Protein adequacy
• Fibre
• Strength training
• Sleep
• Sunlight
• Periodic bloodwork

Supplements are tools.

They are not foundations.

⸻

💬 Why I’m Sharing This

Because I’ve been on both sides:

The athlete chasing the edge.
And the marketer understanding persuasion.

There’s always something being sold.

And there’s always a story attached to it.

The question is:

Is the product solid?
Or is the brand carrying it?

If you’re reading this for the first time, scroll down and read the other posts in this series.

This isn’t about attacking industries.

It’s about understanding how they work.

⸻

🌱 InsideOut

Who Taught You How To Eat?

This content was created using AI as a research and synthesis tool.
All health discussions encourage critical thinking and evidence-based review.

18/02/2026

THIS IS WHY YOU’RE NOT SEEING EVERYTHING.
Good morning my beautiful activist friends 🫶

This is written with respect.

You are doing important work.
You are trying to expose what most people never see.
You are not posting confronting footage “for fun.”
You are posting it because you care.

But I’ve been studying how social media algorithms actually work — and there’s something important we need to understand if the goal is real reach.

Social platforms do not distribute content evenly.

They measure:
• Watch time
• Emotional reaction
• Shares
• Scroll-away speed
• Reports
• Advertiser safety

Graphic slaughter footage — even when educational — often gets:

• Reduced organic reach
• Shown more heavily to people already engaging with vegan content
• Muted or hidden by people outside the vegan community
• Classified as “sensitive” which limits distribution

Which means something uncomfortable…

Sometimes the content meant to wake people up is mostly circulating inside the same activist circle.

And the people we’re trying to reach — the undecided, the meat eaters who’ve never thought about it deeply — often scroll past instantly or never see it at all.

That doesn’t mean stop speaking.

It means strategy matters.

If the goal is persuasion — not just confrontation — then format becomes critical.

A smarter approach (used by journalists and successful campaigns):

1️⃣ Start with a calm hook.
“Most people say they love animals… but most have never seen this.”

2️⃣ Explain why transparency matters before showing anything confronting.

3️⃣ If using graphic content:
– Add a content warning
– Do not use it as the thumbnail
– Do not make it the first 3 seconds
– Keep it brief and contextual

4️⃣ Put full documentaries or hard footage in the comments or link to long-form platforms like YouTube.

Why?

Because platforms reward:
• Watch time
• Thoughtful discussion
• Swiping (carousels)
• Retention

They reduce reach for:
• Shock openings
• Blood-heavy thumbnails
• Rage-style captions

If we want to reach beyond vegans, we need curiosity — not instant defense.

Most people won’t share gore.

But they will share:
• A thoughtful question
• A powerful story
• A calm truth
• A “did you know?” moment
• A personal transformation

This isn’t about watering down truth.

It’s about delivering truth in a way that travels further.

Back in history, major movements didn’t just show brutality — they combined evidence with storytelling, human faces, and strategic messaging.

The message matters.
But how it’s delivered determines who hears it.

If our mission is to reach the middle — strategy is part of compassion.

I’m saying this with respect.
Not criticism.

Because I want your message to travel further.

🟢
🟢
🟢
🟢
🟢
🟢

This conversation is part of the InsideOut project.
“Who Taught You How To Eat?”

We explore food systems, media influence, health, ethics and transparency using evidence-based research, behavioural psychology and real-world analysis.

Some visual concepts and structural ideas are developed with the assistance of AI tools to help communicate complex topics clearly and creatively. All opinions, positioning and direction remain human-led.

Our aim is not to shame — but to question.
Not to attack — but to understand.
Not to shock — but to inform.

InsideOut
Question what you’ve been shown.

17/02/2026

🍎 InsideOut Plant-Based™ Apple Pie with Fresh Oat Custard

Simple. Real ingredients. No processed white sugar. 100% plant-based.

⸻

🥧 Apple Pie

Ingredients (Serves 6–8)

Pastry
• 1 sheet vegan shortcrust pastry (check label at Woolworths – dairy-free)

Filling
• 6 large apples (approx. 900 g), peeled and sliced
• 2 tbsp (30 ml) maple syrup
• 1 tbsp (12 g) coconut sugar
• 1 tsp cinnamon
• ½ tsp ground nutmeg
• ¼ tsp ground cloves
• ¼ tsp allspice
• 1 tbsp lemon juice
• Pinch sea salt

Optional
• 40 g raisins
• 1–2 tbsp grated coconut

⸻

Method
1. Preheat oven to 180°C (fan-forced 170°C).
2. Line a 20–22 cm baking dish with pastry and trim edges.
3. In a saucepan, gently stew apples with lemon juice for 5–7 minutes until slightly softened.
4. Stir in maple syrup, coconut sugar, spices, and salt.
5. Fold through raisins or coconut if using.
6. Spoon filling into pastry case.
7. Add pastry top (full cover or lattice) and seal edges.
8. Bake 35–40 minutes until golden brown.
9. Allow to rest 15 minutes before serving.

⸻

🍮 Homemade Oat Custard

Ingredients
• 500 ml oat milk
• 1 tbsp maple syrup (adjust to taste)
• 1 tsp vanilla extract
• 2 tbsp (16 g) cornflour
• Pinch turmeric (optional, for colour)

⸻

Method
1. Whisk cornflour with 3 tbsp oat milk to create a smooth slurry.
2. Heat remaining oat milk gently in saucepan.
3. Add maple syrup and vanilla.
4. Slowly whisk in slurry while stirring continuously.
5. Cook 3–5 minutes until thickened.
6. Serve warm over apple pie.

⸻

🌱 Nutritional Highlights
• Apples: Rich in soluble fibre (pectin), supports gut health and cholesterol balance.
• Cinnamon & spices: High in antioxidants; cinnamon may assist blood glucose regulation.
• Oat milk: Contains beta-glucans that support heart health.
• No refined white sugar: Naturally sweetened and used in moderation.

This is comfort food made with intention not ultra-processed shortcuts.

If anyone asks,
“Yes, it’s vegan.”
“Yes, it tastes like real pie.”
“Yes, you can still enjoy life without butter.”

🔻 InsideOut Plant-Based™ Footer

This recipe is part of the InsideOut Plant-Based™ education project.
We share evidence-informed, plant-focused recipes designed to support long-term health and conscious living.

Who taught you how to eat?

Food is culture. Food is marketing. Food is biology.
Understanding the difference changes everything.

We openly use AI tools to assist with structure and formatting, while ensuring content is guided by science-based nutrition principles and real-world cooking experience.

Learn more, explore more recipes, and join the conversation:
InsideOut Plant-Based™
Who Taught You How to Eat?

🌱 Evidence over marketing.
🌱 Education over fear.
🌱 Compassion over convenience.

Inside out plant base

03/03/2026

02/03/2026

01/03/2026

26/02/2026

25/02/2026

24/02/2026

20/02/2026

20/02/2026

19/02/2026

18/02/2026

18/02/2026

17/02/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Practice

Shortcuts

Share

Category