01/22/2026
There was a recent segment on Lyme in Canada by CBC that included outdated information (like just mentioning the bull’s eye version of the erythema migrans Lyme rash) and information to suggest that there is no such thing as a chronic version of Lyme.
FYI, MIT is looking into what causes long term issues - https://talresearchgroup.mit.edu/. Many others are as well.
It’s unfortunate that this type of segment is still happening in 2026. Might it have something to do with a Panel Discussion that is happening in Quebec in early February? There is a one hour panel discussion the day before a Lyme Conference hosted by TickNet. The Panel Discussion includes four knowledgeable doctors discussing - “Navigating Complications of Lyme Disease: Translating Research, Practice, and Experience to Improve Patient Care” - https://event.fourwaves.com/publicengagementevent2026.
In 2019 Nova Scotia had the Bridgewater Lyme Conference. A couple of months before the conference a doctor from the US was brought to the province to speak to doctors. Several times he said “It’s only Lyme” and minimized how it can affect people. Trying to detract from what knowledgeable doctors and researchers are going to say seems like an actual method used in this country. Why?
Many have sent a response to CBC. Thank you.
https://canlyme.com/2026/01/chronic-lyme-is-real/
Despite their intention, recent news broadcasts have the potential to put patients at further risk.