Shannon Coates - Voice & The Art of Teaching

Shannon Coates - Voice & The Art of Teaching Home to The VoicePed UnDegree, The VoicePed 101 Library, and Live Office Hours.

Let’s talk about the villain arc of the master–apprentice model.Somewhere in the last decade (or maybe longer … time is ...
02/13/2026

Let’s talk about the villain arc of the master–apprentice model.

Somewhere in the last decade (or maybe longer … time is a construct … ;) ), “master–apprentice” became shorthand for allll of the negative attributes of authoritarian, hierarchical, or power-over teaching. I’ve said it myself.

And -even though I’ve had a change of heart about this -I get why we’re kinda mad at it:

Many of us were trained in power-over learning environments and we love having a short-hand to describe the negative impact of those experiences.

But here’s the thing:
We weren’t harmed by the model.
We were harmed by how expertise was used.

And voice teaching - whether we like it or not - is much closer to the apprenticeship model used in the trades than it is to the lecture model used in academia.

We don’t learn to coordinate respiration, phonation, resonance, and registration by absorbing information from a lecture and passing an exam about it.

We learn by doing. By experimenting. By refining. By developing embodied skill over time, according to our intention.

And that learning arc? IS apprenticeship.

(Ever wonder why music training had a good, long stop in conservatories before it booped on over to universities? yeah. That’s why.)

So, the real question isn’t: “Is master–apprentice oppressive?”

The real question is: What do we believe expertise is for?

If we believe our expertise exists to:
– diagnose
– correct
– prescribe
– judge

Then, yes. Any model will feel top-down. Even the ones we label “student-led.”

But if expertise is a resource…
A guide…
An amplifier of agency…

The exact same model will have radically different learning outcomes.

Next week we’ll go one step further: Top-down teaching isn’t inherently the bad guy either.

For now, I’m curious:
When you hear “master–apprentice,” what assumptions immediately surface for you?

Oh! And if you want to be notified whenever I go Live, sign up here: https://mailchi.mp/shannon-coates/going-live-notification

Thank you Katherine Needleman (aka Queen of Filth) for this astute guide.  The The Royal Conservatory isn’t the only Tor...
02/12/2026

Thank you Katherine Needleman (aka Queen of Filth) for this astute guide.

The The Royal Conservatory isn’t the only Toronto institution that could afford to take heed.

“Life can be hard. Music shouldn’t make it harder.  Music should be a way to heal.”
02/08/2026

“Life can be hard. Music shouldn’t make it harder. Music should be a way to heal.”

𝐋𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐀 𝐋𝐔𝐊𝐌𝐀𝐍'𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘

Lusiana Lukman's account (also below) of sexual abuse at the The Royal Conservatory by Boris Berlin and enabled by Peter Simon plus an article about sexual assault in classical music and other places appeared in today's Toronto Star.

Here I am with Lusiana just last night at the premiere of Lara St John's 𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘓𝘢𝘳𝘢.

*********************

By Lusiana Lukman, Special to the Star

𝘈𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘥-𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘓𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢 𝘓𝘶𝘬𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 1991 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘤 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘰𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 1997. 𝘚𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘰𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳, 𝘞𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳.

Many years ago, a woman called me and asked if I would join her in complaining about a piano instructor at Toronto’s Royal Conservatory of Music, who she said had sexually abused her when she was his student.

I believed her. I, too, had been abused by this teacher. His name was Boris Berlin, and he was a legendary music educator whose instructional books remain a staple for learners of piano to this day.

He began abusing me when I was only 15 years old, a recent visa student from Indonesia who barely spoke English and didn’t have any family or friends here. Like many serious music students, my future depended on my teacher’s approval. He had tremendous power over me, and he exploited it.

Though I believed this woman, I could not bring myself to join her fight. I regret that now. I have come to understand in the years since that a great many students, in conservatories around the world, have been similarly exploited; that so many of us silently carry the shame; and that abusers thrive in this silence. I was not ready to tell my story then. But now I feel it’s important that I do.

***

I came to Canada to study music in 1985 when I was just 14 years old.

Music had always been my happy place. In Jakarta, I went to a lovely school, a second home, a safe place. When my home life was not so great — and it often wasn’t — I would go to the school where things were bright, full of music, friends and joyful memories. I saw music as a refuge.

As I reached my teen years, I knew that I was gay, which is dangerous in Indonesia. So I asked my mother to let me go to Canada in search of a new safe space to study music. She agreed, came with me, and helped me settle in.

My mother chose Boris Berlin as my instructor because he was the most expensive teacher at the RCM. “He must be the best,” she said. Back then, there was a published booklet with a list of teachers’ names and their hourly fees. He was also becoming quite famous with piano students around the world: he wrote the beginners’ piano books that were the series being used in Canada and elsewhere.

Berlin started teaching at the RCM in 1928; by the time I was taught by him in the 1980s, he had already been teaching for more than 50 years. He died in 2001 before the ceremony honouring him with the Order of Canada was held.

Berlin was around 78 years old when I first started taking classes with him. When you take a one-on-one piano lesson (or in any classical music studies) the relationship you have with your teacher is not only intense and close but very vulnerable. They tell you what to work on, how much to practice, what to play. They have the power to make your day, or make you miserable. They can make your career or ruin it.

I remember the room where I took lessons with Berlin very clearly. He had a vertical filing cabinet next to the door of his studio. When I was in the room, he would open the door of that filing cabinet so it would block the tiny window onto his studio. No one could see in.

Like any piano teacher, he would sit beside me and correct my hand position/posture. But soon, his hands started moving. During our sessions, he began touching my breasts, and other parts of my body. Eventually, he took my hand and forced it down his pants to touch his erect p***s. He used my hand to rub his p***s very firmly, then proceeded to take his p***s out and tried to get me to do more.

Days before each of my piano lessons, I would get a stomach-ache. I would have nightmares. I couldn’t sleep. I would practise my piano but couldn’t play well. I still had to function through classes and maintain good enough marks so that my student visa permit would be renewed by the RCM every year. It was mental and physical agony, but I thought that I just had to “deal with it” and move on.

I always wondered how many others had been molested like me.

Eventually, I became aware of whispers and warnings.

I didn’t want to talk about what he was doing — I thought it was somehow my fault. But when I squeamishly told a friend or two about what Berlin had done, and that this was happening at almost every single lesson, I was told I wasn’t the only one.

A close friend urged me to report the abuse. We set up a meeting with the RCM’s Director of Academic Studies, Peter Simon, who was responsible for all student complaints. I asked my friend to accompany me to the meeting and she agreed.

We sat in front of Simon. The room was cold and bare other than the desk he was sitting behind and the two chairs my friend and I sat in. I felt very scared and small.

I told him in detail about the sexual abuse.

When I was finished, Simon asked if I wanted a different teacher.

That was all he said.

I was dumbfounded. I felt invisible and dismissed. As if the words that had been so difficult for me to say had never even been uttered.

That was the only conversation anyone at the RCM had with me about the sexual abuse I experienced there.

I was left with a feeling of tremendous shame. Even after gathering the courage to speak up, I was ashamed that I was a victim, ashamed that I was unable to stop it. Ashamed that even after finally speaking up, I was disregarded, ignored, discarded.

(Contacted late last year by the Star, Simon said he was “very sorry to say that I don’t remember the meeting and the incident.” Simon said that his role at the time did not relate to disciplinary action, but that he would have treated such allegations “with the utmost seriousness” and “reported them to my superiors.”)

I tried for so many years to just block out this episode of my life. But it was hard. I couldn’t change programs, not as a visa student. And so, every day, even after changing teachers, I had to go back to where the abuse had occurred, where Berlin still worked. Every day, I was in danger of running into him. My anxiety ran high.

And then, one day, it happened.

The RCM had a huge elevator that was used to move grand pianos. It was larger than the bedroom I had for many years. It was ominous, creepy and cold.

I was alone in that large elevator. The door opened and Boris Berlin walked in. It was too late for me to exit as the door closed in front of both of us. My heart was racing, my whole body felt cold. He turned to me and said, “You know, those things I did to you, it was to teach you, you know that, right?”

(A spokesperson from the Royal Conservatory of Music did not respond to the Star’s questions about whether the institution was aware of any allegations of assault made against Boris Berlin. It offered the following statement: “We are deeply troubled and saddened to learn of Lusiana Lukman’s personal account and acknowledge the immense courage it takes for people to share their experiences. We do not tolerate abuse in any form and recognise the serious and lasting impact it can have on survivors. Creating a safe and supportive environment for our community of students, teachers, and families is of paramount importance to us.”)

***

If you look at the surface of my life, things seem to have turned out just fine. I became a piano, theory and composition teacher. I received my Master’s degree in music composition from the University of Toronto and started my own music school, the Classical Music Conservatory, on Roncesvalles in 1997.

It’s been more than 40 years since I was first abused by Boris Berlin.

But it wasn’t until I read in the Philadelphia Inquirer about the abuse suffered by violinist Lara St. John at the famous Curtis Institute of Music that I finally started to confront my past. I wrote to St. John. She responded, asking if I would be willing to be involved in her documentary, “Dear Lara,” about sexual abuse in famous music conservatories all over the world. Abuse by powerful teachers like Berlin, of vulnerable students like me.

This time, I agreed.

I agreed because of the huge weight of shame, because of all the sleepless nights, because of all the illness, because of other victims’ suicides.

That shame should not be carried by us — it should be carried by the perpetrators, the pedophiles, the rapists, the abusers. It should be carried by those who covered up and protected them. Children should be protected. Victims should be heard and believed. I knew that I needed to get help, to find the tools to deal with this shame I felt.

I love music, I love teaching and I love sharing the joy of music. I decided to start my own music school to do just that. I want students, especially children, to learn in a joyful and safe environment. I want them to have mentors and teachers who inspire, who treat as sacred the trust their students put in them and the responsibility of sharing the beauty of music.

Life can be hard. Music shouldn’t make it harder. Music should be a way to heal.

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘓𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘚𝘵. 𝘑𝘰𝘩𝘯’𝘴 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 ‘𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘓𝘢𝘳𝘢’ 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘐𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘍𝘪𝘭𝘮 𝘍𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘯 𝘍𝘦𝘣. 6, 2026.

02/06/2026

We’re wrapping up Module 1 of The VoicePed UnDegree, which was all about digging deep and reflecting on Pedagogy Principles in action.

And during that discussion, one of the VPUD teachers was all: rewind! What was that you just said?

“We want to find a way to allow the body to coordinate, versus engineering the coordination.”

So I thought you might like to get in on this as well…

What are your pedagogy principles? What sticks with you when you’re in the studio?

We tend to turn to voiceped texts for allll of the answers about teaching singing.But… is that fair to those danged text...
01/30/2026

We tend to turn to voiceped texts for allll of the answers about teaching singing.

But… is that fair to those danged textbooks? Like, what are we actually asking them to do?

Most of the texts we’ve inherited are (somewhat!) useful for explaining anatomy and physiology, categorizing voices, and prescribing technical solutions but faaaar less useful when it comes to actual pedagogy.

AKA: how teaching unfolds in real time, with real people, in real studios and classrooms.
In this Live Office Hours session, we’ll dig into questions like:
* What roles should voice pedagogy texts play in teacher education and ongoing professional development?
* Where do traditional texts support learning and where do they fall short?
* How can we use texts critically, without either treating them as unquestionable authority or throwing them out entirely?
* What’s missing from the voice pedagogy literature - especially when it comes to student-led, agency-supporting teaching?


I’m not out here giving a lecture or a book list.
Just a live, open convo for voice teachers, pedagogy instructors, and anyone who’s ever felt the gap between “what the book says” and what actually happens in lessons.

Join me on Instagram or YouTube to listen, reflect, ask questions, or just sit with the discomfort - all are welcome.

📝 Want a reminder when I go live?
Click the link in my bio and sign up to receive an email with all the viewing links sent directly to your inbox.

📚 Can’t make it live?
The replay will be available afterward (along with 100+ past Live Office Hours) on my YouTube channel.

Check this ouuuuuuut!!!
01/28/2026

Check this ouuuuuuut!!!

Big news 🤍 I’m writing again - this time, more deeply, more fully.

My new substack called With This Voice is live, and I just hit “publish” on my first article:

This Is Not A Reset: A Response To The Myth Of Endless Self Fixing.

If you’re exhausted by the endless self-blame and feeling like you need to fix yourself, I wrote this for you 🤍🙏🏻.

🔗 in comments to read and subscribe!

Come back and let me know what you think!

I’ve really been appreciating the different directions the discussion took on my last post.(Even though — to my mind — v...
01/28/2026

I’ve really been appreciating the different directions the discussion took on my last post.

(Even though — to my mind — very few people actually answered the question I posed… but that’s a post for another day.)

What I keep circling back to is this:
What about our teaching are we actually trying to change?

What do we want to be more informed about?

And what — *exactly* — do we expect voice pedagogy texts to *do* for our teaching?

If we teach primarily through a diagnose-and-prescribe lens, then the thing we often want to change is our ability to hear what’s happening in the voice and prescribe the “right” exercises. So we turn to voiceped texts for information, frameworks, and tools that help us get better at *that*.

And given that many voice pedagogy texts are implicitly (and sometimes explicitly — The Diagnosis and Correction of Vocal Faults, anyone? 🙃) built on that same model, they’re likely to give us exactly the answers we’re asking for.

But when our teaching starts to shift toward non-prescriptive work that supports agency, artistry, and deep learning… we want to change different things in our teaching. We’re asking different questions.

And those same texts often stop doing what we want them to do.

Not because they’re “bad.” (Obvs.)

But because they were written to answer a different question.

(And yes — I’m very aware that these two models aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive. But until the implicit is made explicit, we don’t actually get to *choose* which model we’re teaching from so ...)

Let’s get into it in my first Live Office Hours of the year.

Curious where this lands for you 👇

What question are *you* actually asking of your pedagogy texts right now?

Live Office Hours
📆 Friday, 30 January
🕙 10:00 AM (Toronto / Eastern)
📍 Live on YouTube & Instagram
🎥 Replay available afterward

This question about what voiceped text to use in a voice pedagogy class landed in my inbox recently and immediately lodg...
01/23/2026

This question about what voiceped text to use in a voice pedagogy class landed in my inbox recently and immediately lodged itself in my brain. Because:

What are voice pedagogy textbooks actually *for*?

Not as a critique of any one book (or author), and certainly not a call to throw texts out altogether, but as a way of naming this kind of tension I hear all the time:

“What textbook is going to help me teach better?”

Many of the texts we’ve inherited are valuable for context, history, and shared vocabulary. And at the same time, don’t offer much guidance about the lived reality of teaching a real person in a real lesson. (Especially if that person is a child or adolescent, or if they want to learn a style we’ve never trained in.)

I’m going to keep pulling on this thread over the next week, because it’s shaping the first Live Office Hours of the year in a meaningful way.

: If you’d like a reminder when I go live, you can click the link in the first comment to get an email with all the viewing links sent directly to you (Instagram + YouTube).

And, yeah: I’m also in the process of writing a voice pedagogy text myself this year, specifically to address some of these gaps. (Thanks to the folks at Full Voice Music for agreeing to go with me on this book-writing quest!)

I’d genuinely love to hear how others are thinking about this - feel free to share in the comments.

✨Ready to Discover Your Best Pedagogical Self in 2026? ✨The VoicePed 101 Library has entered the chat.➡️ You can subscri...
01/21/2026

✨Ready to Discover Your Best Pedagogical Self in 2026? ✨

The VoicePed 101 Library has entered the chat.

➡️ You can subscribe monthly or yearly.
➡️ A wide range of subjects from Child Voice 101 to Neurodiversity-Affirming VoicePed 101. (Though, I recommend starting with Diagnostics 101 and How We Learn 101 to build a strong foundation.)
➡️ Learn at your own pace, on your time.

Explore The VoicePed 101 Library on my website.
🔗 https://drshannoncoates.com/the-voiceped-101-library/

“…having a woman at the top is not the same thing as representation. One woman presiding over a system built and maintai...
01/19/2026

“…having a woman at the top is not the same thing as representation. One woman presiding over a system built and maintained by men does not rebalance a system which has been screwing women over for centuries. It stabilizes it. “

𝐕𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄
𝐚 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

I woke up this morning to an email from someone I don’t know in my personal email. That happens more often than it should, and I don’t love it. So I was primed to dismiss it.

But like so many of the DMs I receive, it was just the tip of the iceberg. (Of course, I receive a huge number of aggressively dumb and hateful messages, but I’m not talking about those right now.) The message said:

𝙊𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙥𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙨.
𝙊𝙣𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣, 𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙮-𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙣.
𝘿𝙤𝙚𝙨𝙣’𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙜𝙚𝙩 𝙗𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜?
𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙫𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚, 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮.

And language matters, and I love language. I’m a musician, so the way something is expressed is something I tend to fixate on. I only looked further because this person, who clearly speaks at least one language better than English, handed me a new word. It turns out to be a real word in English, just not one I had ever known to use. Is the accent on the first or second syllable? The internet says the first. I think I’m going with the second.

I looked deeper. My writer was talking about the results for Round 1 of the Ljubljana Festival Piano Competition 2026.

There are 30 competitors, twenty-nine of whom are men. Just one is a woman.

The preliminary jury that chose them consists of three men only. You might think “preliminary” isn’t important here, but these three men are the ones who admitted and denied people to the contest. These men were Epifanio Comis, Alberto Nosè, and Tomaž Petrač. They literally “kept” the gates to entry. And they went with 97% men.

Once the competition gets going for real, the main competition jury has eleven jurors. Ten are men, but the jury president is a woman! Oh yay, that makes everything okay, right?

I’ve said this before, including recently to Angela Elster, CEO of the Vancouver Symphony Orchestra, when we met privately last week: having a woman at the top is not the same thing as representation. One woman presiding over a system built and maintained by men does not rebalance a system which has been screwing women over for centuries. It stabilizes it. It allows men to point to something and say, “look, everything is great for women now!”

I have seen this pattern repeatedly, where women are elevated symbolically while the forces that limit dissent remain intact. In those systems, discretion is treated as maturity, silence as professionalism, and compliance as proof that the problem has been solved.

It bears repeating that women are not a minority in any population. (Look even, at kids taking piano lessons!) Until representation reaches something like 51%, we are not talking about equity. We are talking about containment: women admitted in small enough numbers to preserve control while still allowing institutions to claim progress.

And if institutions cannot represent women appropriately, there is no reason to believe they will suddenly do right by people who are racially marginalized, gender-diverse, disabled, or otherwise inconvenient to tradition.

Before anyone reaches for the tired “merit” defense, look at the competition’s required repertoire: Chopin. Liszt. Haydn. Mozart. Beethoven. Brahms. Rachmaninoff. Tchaikovsky. Prokofiev.

Not one woman nor one composer of color named.

I continue to find it revealing that I am scolded more harshly for refusing to eroticize an instrument than institutions are for producing outcomes like this.

Never not gonna reshare this one when it comes up in my feed.  Also: I did a 3-hour Optimizing The Speaking Voice worksh...
01/14/2026

Never not gonna reshare this one when it comes up in my feed.

Also: I did a 3-hour Optimizing The Speaking Voice workshop at a local plant of one of the world’s leading cannabis producers today and - lemme tell ya - that joke lands even with non-VoicePed peeps.

(And, yes, it’s about a 15-minute process to get through security at the plant. And, yes, three hours after leaving, I still smell like w**d. And, no, they do not offer samples to their guests. )

Address

Toronto, ON
M6E4W1

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Shannon Coates - Voice & The Art of Teaching posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Shannon Coates - Voice & The Art of Teaching:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram