25/03/2026
FIELD NOTES is back with an interesting article about our relationship with the more "difficult" animal species, and the implications of labelling some animals as "bad" or "evil" ππ¦π¦
In an opinion piece for The Guardian, Jo Wimpenny argues that animals arenβt inherently good or bad, but that we make them so through our emotional reactions to them. Some key points that she makes are:
π Every species plays a part in the web of life, and each is needed
π Our emotional reactions to some species make us devalue them
π Rethinking our relationship with βdifficultβ species is can help us stop further biodiversity loss
Lest this sound a bit preachy, there are certainly some relationships I need to reconsider. One of these is jays. My mother disliked them because they raid the nests of smaller songbirds and eat their eggs and hatchlings. I took a strong dislike when the wood pigeons nesting in my back garden didn't return after a nest raid, as I missed their gentle cooing. But what I didn't know until I bothered to find out is that jays are omnivores, this is natural behaviour, they don't harm biodiversity in the greater scheme of things by raiding nests, and they play an important role in natural reforestation by burying acorns.
Want to read the full article? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/mar/15/vultures-mosquitoes-wasps-species-human-life
Want to know more about jays?
https://www.ywt.org.uk/blog/jumping-jays