Your Life Your End

Your Life Your End A page created for those who want to support and explore their right to be able to choose when their This is unacceptable for many of us.

This is a page for those that want the right to have End of Life choice, are afraid to ask or just need support in their thinking. I will answer any questions you have as best I can from my own experience. Some of us will be faced with a terminal illness which may impact on our decision to make the choice to either carry on living or not. Some of us may be faced with having to live in chronic pain which takes away our ability to enjoy everyday living. Some of us we may have had a terrible accident which see's us living in a world that we dont understand and no longer wish to be a part of. However you arrive at this point you may be faced with wanting to take control of when you want to call time. At the moment the Law does not give us the right to choose when this time comes, instead it forces us to live, no matter what the circumstances are, with quantity of life at all costs, with liitle consideration for quality. There has been plenty of media coverage in recent years with people becoming more and more concerned about the fact that they are being denied this choice. More and more of us want to have control over our end of life demise. The thought for some being made to live through the hell of Dementia, or becoming sick with a terminal illness or having to cope through each day with the torment of chronic pain is not how they want to live. My mother Jackie Meacock first tried to end her life and failed, eventually travelling to Dignitas where she had the peaceful passing she wanted. She was lucky enough to have the support and love of her family but there are many people who dont have that support or perhaps are too afraid to say how they really feel or what they want to their loved ones for fear of upsetting them or being misunderstood. This page is for anyone who wants to know about anything to do with end of life choices, or just wants to read about other peoples experiences. Please show your support by liking this page and sharing. The more people that support this the more the Government will have to look at the issue of end of life choice on Assisted Dying and bring it back onto the Political agenda and keep it there until it is legalised. We will all face the end of our life; Some of us want to be able to say when that will be, given the circumstances they face and to be able to choose a quality of their life over quantitiy.

21/10/2025

Louise Shackleton says current law is traumatising families and she wanted jury to assess her innocence

19/09/2025
19/09/2025

Today marks an important step forward for the . The status quo is unworkable, unsafe, and cruel. It’s vital that the Bill is granted enough time to continue its passage through Parliament for the sake of dying people and their families.

Here's your brief of what happend today ⬇️

The Lords has set up a Select Committee to examine assisted dying in a historic first as the Bill passed its Second Reading in the Lords. No such committee has ever been created for a Private Member’s Bill that originated in the Commons, and this has happened just once for government legislation.

The record-breaking debate saw nearly 180 peers speak over the two days, making it the longest debate with the highest number of speakers for any Private Members’ Bill. It is also a first for the UK Parliament in having the Lords grant a Second Reading to an assisted dying bill from the Commons.

If the Bill is to pass, it needs to complete all stages by the end of the parliamentary session in spring 2026. The amendment will permit further evidence to be taken on the Bill while having a limited, three week impact on its timeline.

It will further evidence the unprecedented scrutiny and debate the Bill has benefited from, contradicting claims that the Bill is being rushed through. Following the reporting of the Select Committee by 7 November, the Bill will progress to its Committee Stage for detailed line-by-line scrutiny.

We are on the way 🙂
19/09/2025

We are on the way 🙂

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill today passed its Second Reading in the House of Lords, marking a significant milestone in its journey towards becoming law.

12/09/2025

It was a good gathering today and the sun came out too, result 😎

12/09/2025

On my way to support the 2nd reading today, see you in Parliament Square😎

I'll be attending this tomorrow, lets make sure we are heard. See you there🙂
11/09/2025

I'll be attending this tomorrow, lets make sure we are heard. See you there🙂

It takes 2 minutes

20/06/2025

Amazing news and one step closer to an Assisted Dying Law.

20/06/2025

I have long accepted that the end of life is a process and a journey that we will all share without escape and I would prefer for my own self being to be able to have some choice over when that might happen if faced with a terminal, chronic or ill-health situation of which I may not recover or perhaps decide that I cannot live with. So what’s the alternative and what’s available?
Palliative care in the UK is apparently of a gold star standard. I’m not sure what that means exactly but whatever it is, not everyone wants it. Some will accept their fate and wait for the end however it comes either drugged up in a hospital bed or at home, it's usually centered around trying to make the patient comfortable as they head towards that end. This can be quite a long, drawn-out process usually being induced with copious amounts of drugs, delaying an inevitable outcome whilst your loved ones sit around and wait.
No thanks, that’s not for me.
For many the end can be a welcome relief when all the pain relief in the world wasn’t enough to stop the agonising pain and torture of your illness as it overtakes you and the nursing staff start to give you more and more medication to help hasten the end. It’s an unspoken given that this happens, so for some, an assisted end is already happening but in a very controlled minimal way.
For those of us who don't want to accept that, you would probably start to think about self-administering your own end. Without the support of family this can be a lonely journey as the alternatives are too difficult to think about. It isn’t easy to end your life, the body is capable of withstanding many things even though life itself is fragile. Would you want to starve yourself to death, this is supposedly very painful. Would you be able to drown yourself in the bath or swallow all those pills even if you had enough to do the job properly and would you know what to take. The reality is stark and grim. Self-deliverance is a lonely place when you have limited resources or no physical capacity to be able to self-administer. And if it all goes wrong, what then.
Making the decision to travel abroad, leaving everything you know is a luxury afforded only to those who can afford it and is an extravagant last wish only available to those with the means to pay. But what if you don't have that kind of money, what then?

There needs to be a balance between the two needs to reflect an individual’s right to be able to choose death over life, at a time of their choosing and not when their illness or body dictates. It’s essential to think about it in terms of ending suffering rather than ending life, no-one actually wants to die, they just want the pain to stop a For some reason there is this fear around death and how it will end, it's a taboo subject never to be spoken of except in whispered conversations around the dying person’s bed. We fear things that are unknown to us it's only natural, which is why the subject should be open for discussion and normalised over a cup of tea and a biscuit with your loved ones.
Let them know what you want or don't want before it's too late. Have that conversation, it isn't morbid, it's life and it’s taking control of a potentially difficult end.
I'm not immune to those that don’t want to have that conversation and don't believe in assisted dying but that’s the whole point, it's their choice not to do it but I don’t have that choice to be able to do it.
We have choice over almost every aspect of our lives except around when we will die.

The British Medical Association or BMA states that, ‘An assisted dying law, however well intended, would alter society’s attitude towards the elderly, seriously ill and disabled, and send the subliminal message that assisted dying is an option they ‘ought’ to consider’ Not exactly a strong argument as the suggestion here is that this group of people could feel pressurized or coerced into an assisted end so as not to feel a burden to their loved ones. The fact is that part of the reason assisted dying is wanted as a choice by individuals is that they, not their relatives, don’t want to be a burden, it’s not about how you feel about it, it’s what we feel about it that matters and that’s the whole point, it’s what we want not what you perceive as what we want or what you might want to push upon us. Coercive behaviour isn’t anything new and many people have already been coerced into ending their lives already yet no-one is campaigning about that. With this in mind a legal right with safeguards in place would actually offer protection for those who are vulnerable as they will be more protected and not any more at risk than they are already.
As for the religious view, well I really don’t think there is any argument that stacks up here, religious groups have already opposed everything else; LGBTQ rights, Abortion, Divorce, this has to be the last thing they can oppose and there just isn’t anything of substance for them to argue. However I should make it clear that I am not anti-religious in any way, everyone has the right to believe and or worship their God in whatever form they believe in, it’s your business not mine and you have every right to it.
Then there’s the slippery slope, but what exactly is this slippery slope? There is a fear that the criteria of an assisted end would be extended beyond that of being terminally ill and yes that’s not a bad thing but should we be fearful of this and what exactly would it mean if it were extended?
The six months to live as a criteria will be so difficult to measure, no one can say with certainty that someone has just six months or less to live as many live beyond this time frame so it should be a guidance only, a way to measure the possibility but as we all know, sickness, illness disease, it’s a difficult area to quantify in terms of how much longer you have left to live or for some just to exist.
A Dementia patient is at some point going to die with their condition and may well lose capacity way before their last six months, they may have already made it clear that they don’t want to be kept alive so how from a legal point of view will that person be able to communicate that the time has come? You may live for many years but maybe not in the way that the individual wants too, at what point can you say with certainty that they have less than six months to live when they don’t even want to have to get to that point where they have already lost capacity in so many ways already? It may be easier with a Cancer diagnosis to say for certainty how much longer you have but what about all those living with or managing or suffering with conditions which don’t fall within this terminal six months to live criteria, people like my mum?
The six-month rule will at some point need to be more inclusive and less exclusive as it will still deny many the end they want.
My mum suffered in terrible agonising pain with a Neurological condition called Dystonia which was progressive despite being told it wasn’t. I watched over a ten-year period as she shrank to a rack of bones, living on a cocktail of drugs to help her through each day, she had no quality to her life, there was no escape from it and she was never going to recover. It was her choice not to have to endure another moment living in her own torturous hell, I supported and helped her where I could because she was my mother and I loved her but she would not have met the criteria of the six months left to live due to terminal illness being proposed, but it is a start.
It's very simple, why should it be so hard to have the help you need at the time when you need it most, at the end of your own life.
I've already had the conversation with my children. We laugh about it but they know what I want and don't want, it’s just part of our lives.
I hope that when faced with my own impending end for whatever reason that there will be a law in place to allow for an assisted end and if it isn't then my kids know what to do or I’ll rely on the kindness of strangers with an online Just Giving page to get me there.
But it will be my choice to say when enough is enough and to have some dignity and say in how that happens.

18/06/2025

In London? Join us at the Assisted Dying Rally in Parliament Square on Friday from 09:00 to 15:00.

Support the ?

Standing alongside us in Parliament Square is the most powerful way to show your support - to be seen, to be heard, and to help bring about real, lasting change.

We're almost there.
15/06/2025

We're almost there.

We welcome today's debate. The Assisted Dying BIll has now had more hours of debate than any of the Private Members’ Bill of its kind, and we know the public is also paying attention, the majority of whom will be desperately hoping the law is changed.

Next Friday, we hope MPs stand up for compassion. Politicians should be emphasising that no-one should be compelled to endure unnecessary suffering at the end of life. We hope MPs remain committed to crafting a law that is robust and safe, yet deeply mindful of the experiences and dignity of those facing their final days.

Link in comments.

16/05/2025

Thirteen years ago I was in Zurich holding my mums hand where she consumed a prescription medication to end her life.
It wasn’t su***de, it was an assisted end to her suffering and she had no choice but to travel abroad, paying £10,000 for the privilege of being able to do this. But not everyone is physically able to do this or has the money; for them, the options are limited.

The current debate around Assisted Dying looks at both sides of the argument, and rightly so; a legal right to end your life requires strong safeguards in place to ensure protection but the fact remains that many people have already opted for an illegal assisted end because there has been no other choice. Some have had to leave their loved ones to travel abroad and pay thousands of pounds for the privilege, whilst some have had to resort to a DIY end as the only feasible means of being able to have that peaceful, dignified end to their suffering.

Each case would be considered on its own circumstances as each will be different but they will all have the same wish in mind and that is to be able to have the choice.
A legal assisted end ensures an individual can end their suffering at a time when they are ready and not when their failing body dictates. It isn’t su***de, you’re already dying.

My mum didn’t have a terminal condition, she had Dystonia, a painful neurological condition where her whole body contorted to one side with unrelenting muscle spasms and a full continual body tremor. She took so much medication just to get through each tortuous day she was totally reliant on them and every day was filled with pain and not much else. With zero quality to her life, the effects were having a terminal effect and it was only a matter of time before something happened that would either limit her capacity or take it away completely for her to be able to take some control around how and when it was all going to end as all she had to look forward too was more days, weeks or years of pain.
We had exhausted all avenues available and had in fact been denied some treatments like deep brain stimulation as the consultant didn’t want her dying on his operating table, even though she was prepared to sign anything that would waiver them from any responsibility; she was so desperate in her pain, it was just all consuming and difficult to witness. Her face was etched with lines of pain, it was a cruelty she couldn’t endure for much longer.

You could argue that what’s needed is better palliative care or perhaps had she waited there may have been a cure but how long do you wait? Palliative care is already apparently at a gold star level in the UK but it’s not about the care you can get.

Receiving a diagnosis of a terminal/life limiting condition can make you think about your impending mortality and for many it can provide clarity around what you do or don’t want. Imagine being denied the end you want, at the time you want because the law dictates that you have to live regardless of your pain and suffering.
How can we force those suffering to keep living because the law says they have too. What’s right for one person may not be for someone else.

Assisted dying is about choice. Having the choice to make an informed decision about your own end and when that will be and not when your suffering may be too much. For many, all the palliative care in the world won’t make any difference if it’s not what they want.

Some medical professions will argue that it’s their job to preserve life, not extinguish it but surely it shouldn’t be at all costs especially if it isn’t want the individual wants. For many, the quality of their life will exceed the quantity.

Wanting to end your suffering doesn’t mean you are mentally unwell. If you have been in agony, suffering in pain it can indeed impact on your mental health and you may well experience low mood but this isn’t depression, a label which the medical profession seem all too willing to slap onto an individual expressing their less than happy wish to stay alive with their Cancer or Dementia.

Denying an individual the choice around how and when their life will end due to a terminal condition is cruel.

My mum had already tried to end her suffering when she took a massive overdose of her medications and I had sat with her holding her hand for almost two days before she let me call for help as it hadn’t worked. She was Sectioned as the medical profession said she must have been depressed to have tried to take her life. Her physical condition was never considered and she was treated appallingly in the hands of the mental health team. After two weeks I was able to get the Section rescinded but had to fight to get them to see how physically ill she was and that she wasn’t mentally ill.

Ironically this experience only hastened her need to have her peaceful end as she could see what might happen to her should she lose capacity and become reliant on the medical professionals who didn’t really understand her condition or her needs. And for many this is exactly what they don’t want. They don’t want to have their toilet needs catered for, to be spoon fed and have someone wipe their dribble. They want their dignity.

As for the slippery slope? There is no slippery slope and no evidence to support this. Coercion has always existed, if anything a legal assisted end would offer protection to those who feel vulnerable, something which they don’t have now.

Don’t judge those who want an assisted end, you may be screaming for it yourself one day if you should find yourself in a situation where your life is ending through ill health.

We have choice around everything in our lives except the ability to be able to choose when we want it all to end.

It's very simple, give us the legal right to choose.

Address

Brighton

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Your Life Your End posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram