26/02/2026
Having the 'whole dream'. I appreciate what Segal says about imagination in the following passage...
"Day-dreams, understandably, have a bad press in psychoanalysis. And yet they are not far from something highly valued, that is, imagination. Day-dreams can be the beginning of story-telling....When Proust's Elstir, the painter, says, "If a little dreaming is dangerous the cure for it is not less dreaming but more dreaming, the whole dream", he speaks not of night dreams but of day-dreams....I like to think that Elstir's 'more dreaming', 'the whole dream', refers to the move from day-dreaming to imagination. The whole dream, to my mind, means less splitting, more integration, and reaching deeper layers of the mind.
Freud has said that the artist's fantasy must loose its egocentric character to become compatible with art. 'Losing the egocentric character', I think involves a modification of the pleasure principle. It necessitates integrating ones perceptions of external reality that includes others and the perception of one's own relation to them. It also includes perceptions of the relation between them.
In other words, imagination, unlike the typical day-dream, necessitates some abandonment of omnipotence and some facing of the depressive position. This makes imagination richer and more complex than a wish-fulfilling day-dream. The deeper layers of the mind which can thus be mobilized, the richer, denser, and more flexible is imagination."
— Hanna Segal, Dream, Phantasy and Art
Chapter 8 - Imagination, play and art