22/11/2022
All too common unfortunately...
*** RIDER WEIGHT AND HORSE WELFARE; WITH WHOM DOES THE RESPONSIBILITY LIE? ***
A tough topic to broach. But, Iām sorry to say, one that really, really needs broaching. Back in March 2019, the exceptional Dr Sue Dyson, published her pilot study on the influence of rider:horse body weight ratio. The conclusions werenāt really that surprising; large riders can induce temporary lameness and behaviours consistent with musculoskeletal pain. The hugely disappointing outcome of this study, is that I still regularly see riders that are far, FAR too heavy for their horses. No b******t about how heavy riders can āride lightā. Rubbish. The fact remains that if you are 5 stone too heavy for your horse, you are far too heavy for your horse, even if you can ride along with your toe resting on your elbow.
But who is going to be ābraveā enough to walk up to a rider, and tell them that their weight on that poor horseās back, is in fact a welfare issue? And with whom does this responsibility lie?
Does it lie with the dressage or jumping judge, to ring their bell and eliminate a rider for being alarmingly too heavy for their horse? Maybe? But that rider then bursts into tears, and shares a photo of their 20 stone self, perched on their little Connemara cross, and 600 ābe kindsā on social media, immediately tell said rider that the judge is a bully and they look great. š¤·āāļøš¤·āāļø What about being kind to their poor little horse/pony?
Iām sure this is offending at least 25% of you so far, but I actually donāt care. Riding is classified as a āsportā. Therefore, whatever our level, should we not be classing ourselves as āathletesā??
No amount of physio/chiro sessions for Nobby, will compensate for the fact he has to brace his whole back as you land in the saddle. No amount of matchy matchy fleecy leg bandages will support his tiny little limbs as he struggles to maintain canter for more than three seconds.
In Dr Dysonās trial, ALL SEVEN of the āvery heavyā rider tests were abandoned due to the weight of the rider resulting in obvious lameness, in horses that were sound minutes before, and sound again straight after. A very heavy rider was one whose rider:horse body weight percentage was greater than 20%. An average horse is around 500kg, so these riders were over 100kg/15-16 stone. Every single one of these riders induced lameness in the trial horse they were on. Just ponder that thought. These were not subtle lamenesses, either. We are talking 4-5/10 lame in trot, during the first trot with that rider. That is lame. To be fair, these riders may have been 20 stone, as there was no upper limit.
So we look at the āheavyā group, who had a rider: horse body weight percentage of 15-18%. So, on a 550kg horse, that would be a rider weighing 82-100kg, or 13 stone- 15.5 stone. FIVE of the heavy rider tests were abandoned due to lameness, and one due to the horse showing pain in canter.
So, back to the point of the article. Who should be the person responsible for telling these riders that they are far too heavy (Iām not taking a stone too heavy, even)? Have I been tempted? Absolutely. But would I then get a roasting on social media? Most definitely. Have I told clients that they are too heavy? Yes. Not as often as I probably should have, but yes, I have. Itās a very, very tricky subject to broach with riders, who often genuinely love their horses, and donāt realise the damage they are doing, and the pain they may be causing.
I honestly donāt know the answer to my question. If I was judging, I may never be asked to judge again. So why Woy if they risk eliminating someone? As a vet, Iām probably better placed to go and have a quiet word, but then I can guarantee Iād be met with, āwell, my vet doesnāt think Iām too heavyā, followed by a āsheās so unprofessionalā social media rant. But something needs doing, and saying.
Watch this space!
Please share!
Photo of Johnnie and I going clear at Barbury 4* earlier this year, because you havenāt had a Johnnie photo for a while!