11/04/2026
We didn’t really need a study to know that the tighter the noseband the more pressure we are placing on the horse’s mandible and nasal plane (not forgetting the soft lining of the mouth and cheeks being pressed into the molars and premolars), as well as inhibiting hind leg mobility. BUT it is good to have the data to back it up as I am sure some don’t stop to consider the horse as a living being capable of feeling sensations such as discomfort or pain. Data such as this really can’t be disputed. As for the comparison between the different styles of nosebands. . . .
I will never support the use of a flash noseband, for me it is a shortcut and cover up tool. This style of noseband was introduced in the mid twentieth century when there was an emphasis on reducing oral behaviours such as mouth opening. A quick fix to silence the horse’s discomfort.
I have in my 3 plus years of qualified bridle and bit fitting seen only 2 horses that went ‘better’ in a flash and interestingly they had both been trained abroad and imported into the UK. I am sure given time and some ‘unpicking and re-training’ they would fair better in an alternative. It’s an interesting one!
When I am out consulting and meeting clients for the first time, I see so many who ride with a flash strap on their noseband purely for the reason ‘it came with the bridle’. The first thing I do is remove it. It’s such a joy to see them ride free from the flash, with the horse looking so much more relaxed and happy. Sadly it is still common to see many horses being ridden on Social Media with their jaws strapped shut, fighting the bit, holding tension throughout their body resulting in a lack of true communication. Change is coming, but oh so very slowly it feels at times. But every study and every conversation we have, can help push welfare forwards. So let’s keep doing just that!
🗞️RESEARCH NEWS🗞️
Exciting to see two of our noseband publications recognised in the top 10 most-cited papers in Equine Veterinary Journal🤓
For the past several years, our research group has studied the biomechanical interactions between the bridle and the horse’s head, producing a series of publications covering this important area.
Super exciting that two of these studies were published in Equine Veterinary Journal, one of the most globally respected veterinary journals.
This is a team effort, and would not have been possible without the brilliant research team, researchers, riders, owners, research assistants, and supporters.
Massive thank you to our funders for their support: World Horse Welfare, the Canadian Sport Horse Association, Hartpury University, the British Equestrian Federation, and The Worshipful Company of Saddlers.
As we continue on this journey we have more papers under review, and underway.
The two EVJ publications are available as open access:
📚Clayton HM, Murray, R., Williams, J. M., Walker, V., Fisher, M., Fisher, D., Nixon, J., Mackechnie-Guire, R. Facial pressure beneath a cavesson noseband adjusted to different tightness levels during standing and chewing. Equine Veterinary Journal. 2024:1-11.
🔗 https://beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/evj.14451
📚MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray, R., Williams, J. M., Nixon, J., Fisher, M., Fisher, D., Walker, V., Clayton, H. M. Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse's face at trot. Equine Veterinary Journal. 2024:1-15.
🔗 https://beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/evj.14420
beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
centaurbiomechanics.co.uk
pure.hartpury.ac.uk/en/