
28/12/2022
There is no such thing as a “natural induction”.
Repost from
•
“Natural induction” isn’t really natural. And it’s still induction.
I know many mamas and midwives that think they “have to” because of all the silly rules and regs that govern women’s bodies in some places. And I’ve heard the argument that it’s better to try a “natural” induction at home first, if the alternative is a pharmaceutical, and I don’t necessarily agree.
If we cannot respect the timing of a baby and the timing of the mama’s body, we aren’t really starting off on a very trusting foot. Add in endless herbs, and ni**le stim and castor oil and we begin playing God. We are saying that we need as ego humans is more important, and sometimes maybe it’s worth that risk.
In the end, induction at home often doesn’t go well. Wonky labors that need further assistance, babies that need help descending, uterus that needs help with excess bleeding, babes that need help breathing. Why are we surprised that one or ALL of these things might result from “natural induction”? And if luck is on our side, maybe terrible things don’t happen but we have to live with the fact that we forced a baby out before his time.
What am I proposing? I am suggesting that we let mama baby dyad lead the way, and if mom and babies are fine and thriving, leave them alone so that the hormonal process of birth can unfold. If mama and baby are not fine (for some reason that probably has nothing to do with being beyond the due date), then I will go out on a limb and say that a medical induction may be better/safer because of the advanced monitoring and surgical options.
Have you been told “natural induction” has no risks?
Love, Maryn ❤️
Photo of gorgeous Olivia and baby Atlas:)