01/05/2025
𝙎𝘾𝙄𝙀𝙉𝙕𝙀 𝙈𝙊𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙄𝙀 𝙊 𝙁𝙄𝙎𝙄𝙊𝙏𝙀𝙍𝘼𝙋𝙄𝙎𝙏𝙄?
𝘼 𝘾𝙃𝙄 𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙋𝙀𝙏𝙀 𝙄𝙇 𝙍𝙀𝘾𝙐𝙋𝙀𝙍𝙊 𝘿𝙀𝙄 𝙋𝘼𝙕𝙄𝙀𝙉𝙏𝙄?
𝘖𝘨𝘯𝘪 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰, 𝘪𝘯 𝘐𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢, 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘥𝘪 7 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘨𝘭𝘪 𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘪. 𝘔𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘪 𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘪, 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘰 𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘥𝘪 𝘥𝘪 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰. 𝘕𝘦𝘭 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘤𝘰, 𝘪𝘭 25% 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘱𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘮𝘶𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰.
𝘓𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪, 𝘮𝘢 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪.
𝘌𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘪 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘻𝘢, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢, 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘪 𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪, 𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘭 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪. 𝙏𝙧𝙖 𝙦𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞, 𝙞𝙡 𝙈𝙪𝙡𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙏𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 (𝙈𝙏𝘾) 𝙚̀ 𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙤𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙪𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙖 𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙖 𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙖 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙡’𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙘𝙘𝙞𝙤 𝙥𝙞𝙪̀ 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙖 𝙧𝙞𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙖 𝙛𝙪𝙣𝙯𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙚, 𝙨𝙤𝙥𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙪𝙩𝙩𝙤 𝙣𝙚𝙞 𝙨𝙤𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞 𝙛𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙡𝙞.
𝘚𝘪 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘶𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰 𝘢𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘤𝘰, 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘻𝘢, 𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘭’𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢̀, 𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘪 𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘪. 𝘌̀ 𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘪 𝘗𝘢𝘦𝘴𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢, 𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘱𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦.
𝘐𝘯 𝘐𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢 𝘭’𝘔𝘛𝘊 𝘢𝘭𝘭'𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘪 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘦̀ 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘪 𝘴𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪, 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘭 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘦, 𝙢𝙖 𝙘𝙤𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙖 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙯𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙖 𝙘𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙤 𝙣𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙡 𝙢𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙞 𝙖𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙤, 𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙚, 𝙣𝙚𝙡 𝙡𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙤 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙤𝙙𝙤.
𝘋𝘢𝘭𝘭’𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘤’𝘦̀ 𝘪𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦, 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘔𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘗𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘦 𝘈𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘭’𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭’𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘢 𝘥𝘪 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘪, 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪, 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘪 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪.
𝘓𝘦 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪, 𝘮𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢, 𝘴𝘪 𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘰.
𝘓𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘦 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘯𝘢 𝘭𝘢 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘢𝘭𝘭'𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰, 𝘥𝘢𝘭 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦 𝘦̀ 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘰, 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵-𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘢 𝘦̀ 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘢 𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘣𝘣𝘦 𝘱𝘪𝘶̀ 𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘰, 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭’𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘢.
𝘖𝘨𝘨𝘪 𝘦̀ 𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘪 𝘳𝘶𝘰𝘭𝘪. 𝘕𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘷𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪, 𝘮𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢.
𝘐𝘭 𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘷𝘳𝘦𝘣𝘣𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵-𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘢, 𝘪𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘷𝘳𝘦𝘣𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘶𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘢̀ 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘰, 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘪 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰.
𝙇’𝙤𝙗𝙞𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙤 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙚 𝙣𝙤𝙣 𝙚̀ 𝙡𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙡 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙤 𝙖𝙢𝙗𝙞𝙩𝙤 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙚, 𝙢𝙖 𝙞𝙡 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙡𝙖 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣𝙖.
𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰, 𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘢 𝘯𝘶𝘰𝘷𝘢 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰. 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦́ 𝘪𝘭 𝘱𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘩𝘢 𝘣𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘨𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘪 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘻𝘦. 𝘕𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘮𝘢 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘢.
𝘍𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪 𝘯𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰