Luciana Leo Osteopata

Luciana Leo Osteopata Osteopata D.O.m.R.O.I.

22/09/2025

Un nuovo studio apre le porte a una riflessione scientifica innovativa 💡

È stato pubblicato l’articolo “Does Osteopathic Heart-Focused Palpation Modify Heart Rate Variability in Stressed Participants with Musculoskeletal Pain?” sulla rivista Healthcare da Lucas Bohlen del NACE Germania.

Lo studio esplora l’impatto della palpazione osteopatica focalizzata sul cuore nella regolazione della variabilità cardiaca nei pazienti stressati con dolore muscoloscheletrico.

Una nuova prospettiva che unisce approccio manuale, neuroscienze e medicina integrata.

🔗 Leggi l’articolo completo (in inglese): https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12020138

08/09/2025

🔬 Nuove evidenze: osteopatia e recupero post-appendicectomia nei bambini

Uno studio pilota pubblicato su Frontiers ha coinvolto 43 piccoli pazienti, tra 5 e 17 anni, operati di appendicectomia presso l’AOU Meyer di Firenze. I risultati sono promettenti, infatti i bambini trattati osteopaticamente hanno mostrato
✅ una durata di degenza media di 4,6 giorni (contro i 7 giorni dei bambini del gruppo di controllo che non hanno ricevuto il trattamento osteopatico)
✅ riduzione del dolore addominale e scapolare
✅ recupero gastrointestinale più rapido e movimento facilitato

👉 Questo studio è un'altra testimonianza della concreta possibilità d'integrazione dell'osteopatia alle cure standard. La collaborazione tra pediatria, gli altri professionisti sanitari e l'osteopata merita di essere ulteriormente diffusa, esplorata e arricchita, al fine di migliorare la qualità delle cure e quindi e la salute dei più piccoli!

Approfondisci lo studio su .it 👉 https://www.tuttosteopatia.it/pubblicato-lo-studio-clinico-dedicato-allefficacia-del-trattamento-manipolativo-osteopatico-volto-al-sostegno-della-salute-dei-pazienti-pediatrici-operati-di-appendicectomia-presso-l

05/09/2025
24/08/2025

Breathing isn't just life—it's therapy.

The diaphragm plays a key role in lymphatic flow, visceral mobility, and nervous system regulation. It’s also deeply affected by trauma, posture, and chronic pain.

Osteopaths assess the diaphragm by tuning into the body’s internal rhythm. A restricted diaphragm can impact digestion, energy, emotional state, and even the body’s ability to detoxify.

OMT techniques that release the diaphragm can transform how a patient feels both physically and emotionally.

Osteopathy sees breathing as both diagnosis and treatment.

17/08/2025

The Osteopathic Listening Touch: hands that listen can change everything.

In osteopathy, touch is diagnostic. Subtle. Informed. Present.

An experienced DO can feel fluid restrictions, fascial tension, or asymmetries with remarkable precision. They’re trained to perceive what others may miss—not just symptoms, but stories beneath them.

This is not intuition—it’s anatomy-informed perception, developed through years of study, practice, and intention.

👂 The osteopathic touch is a form of listening.
It says:
I see your pain.
I honor your body’s story.
I trust your capacity to heal.

Osteopaths don’t “fix” the body—they invite it back into relationship with itself.

12/08/2025
31/07/2025

🗞️ Altra intervista, questa volta su “Io donna”

Andrea Manzotti ci spiega come il trattamento osteopatico possa rivelarsi un alleato per la salute femminile: dai problemi funzionali, come il dolore pelvico cronico e la vulvodinia, alle comorbilità legate alle operazioni chirurgiche, come le cicatrici ostetriche.

Puoi trovare l’intero articolo su https://www.iodonna.it/benessere/salute-e-psicologia/2025/07/28/osteopatia-perche-e-unalleata-della-salute-delle-donne-a-tutte-le-eta/

29/07/2025
14/07/2025

📢 Just published

Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain Have Reduced Myofascial Force Transmission Between Latissimus Dorsi and Contralateral Gluteus Maximus Muscles

🔃 The human body's myofascial system consists of connective tissues that enable mechanical force transmission not only within but also between muscles across joints and anatomical regions. Anatomical studies and cadaveric dissections have indicated potential myofascial continuity between the latissimus dorsi (LD) and contralateral gluteus maximus (GM) muscles via the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF), forming part of the so-called posterior oblique sling system [11,12].

📘 Previous research suggested this interconnected system may facilitate force transmission across the trunk and pelvis and contribute to load transfer during gait and dynamic movement [1,7]. However, whether these transmission pathways are functionally relevant in vivo—particularly in pathological populations—remained unclear. Chronic low back pain (CLBP), which affects approximately 23% of the global population at some point in life [2], has been associated with impaired neuromuscular control and myofascial alterations [3,4,8]. Therefore, a brand-new study by Procópio and colleagues investigated whether myofascial force transmission between the LD and contralateral GM differs between individuals with CLBP and healthy controls (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40616971/).

🧪 Methods

A total of 40 participants were included: 20 with clinically diagnosed chronic low back pain (CLBP group) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Using ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE), the researchers assessed passive tissue stiffness in the contralateral GM muscle during an isometric contraction of the LD muscle.

Each subject lay prone while performing submaximal shoulder extension (activating the LD), and SWE was used to detect changes in the stiffness of the contralateral GM muscle, representing a proxy for myofascial force transmission (s. figure in comments). The primary outcome was the percent change in stiffness of the contralateral GM during LD contraction, compared between groups.

📊 Results

▶️ In healthy controls, contraction of the LD muscle led to a significant increase in stiffness of the contralateral GM (mean increase: 12.7%, p < 0.001), indicating effective force transmission through the thoracolumbar fascial chain.

▶️ In contrast, CLBP patients showed no significant change in contralateral GM stiffness (mean increase: 1.5%, p = 0.421).

▶️ The between-group comparison revealed a statistically significant reduction in stiffness increase in the CLBP group compared to controls (p < 0.001).

💬 Discussion

The results support the functional existence of a myofascial connection between the LD and contralateral GM via the TLF in healthy individuals, consistent with prior anatomical and modeling studies [5,11]. The observed impairment in the CLBP group aligns with research showing altered neuromuscular coordination, reduced fascial mobility, and increased connective tissue stiffness in individuals with chronic back pain [3,4,8].

These findings suggest that CLBP may disrupt long-range myofascial force chains, which could have implications for trunk and pelvic force transfer and locomotion efficiency. Such dysfunction may contribute to persistent motor control deficits and compensatory strategies commonly reported in CLBP populations [7,9,10].

Importantly, this study provides the first in vivo functional evidence—using shear wave elastography—of altered intermuscular force transmission in a chronic pain population. It strengthens the notion that the thoracolumbar fascia acts not just as a passive structure but as an active participant in force modulation and transmission across regions.

However, we do not know whether this reduced myofascial force transmission is a cause, a consequence or an epiphenomenon of CLBP. Furthermore, there is no data to show which intervention is best suited to rehabilitate this reduced force transmission.

✅ Conclusion

This study demonstrates that chronic low back pain is associated with reduced myofascial force transmission between the latissimus dorsi and contralateral gluteus maximus muscles. Thus, potential factors such as greater weakness [12], and decreased GM cross-sectional area [13] commonly observed in this population, reduced fascial gliding (3), the presence of fibrosis and adhesions in the thoracolumbar fascia, and alterations in neuromuscular control (3,4,11) may all contribute to impaired MFT in the pathway investigated.

📘 Illustration: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30616942/

📚 Key References (as cited in the study)

1. Barker, P. J., et al. (2007). Clinical Biomechanics, 22, 939–945.

2. Balagué, F., et al. (2012). Lancet, 379(9814), 482–491.

3. Langevin, H. M., et al. (2011). Spine, 36(13), E868–E876.

4. Langevin, H. M., & Sherman, K. J. (2007). Medical Hypotheses, 68(1), 74–80.

5. Vleeming, A., et al. (1995). Spine, 20(7), 753–760.

6. Willard, F. H., et al. (2012). Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 16(1), 66–73.

7. Wilke, J., et al. (2017). Journal of Anatomy, 231(6), 947–956.

8. Hodges, P. W., & Moseley, G. L. (2003). Manual Therapy, 8(4), 200–206.

9. Van Dieën, J. H., et al. (2003). Clinical Biomechanics, 18(7), 637–655.

10. Carvalhais, V. O. C., et al. (2013). Journal of Biomechanics 46 (5): 1003–7.

11. Huijing, P. A. (2009). European Journal of Applied Physiology, 108(3), 389–404.

12. Nadler, S.F., et al. (2000). Clin. J. Sport Med. 10, 89–97.

13. Amabile, A.H., et al. (2017). PLoS One 12 (7).

07/07/2025

Indirizzo

Soleto (LE)
Soleto

Orario di apertura

Lunedì 09:00 - 20:00
Martedì 09:00 - 20:00
Mercoledì 09:00 - 20:00
Giovedì 09:00 - 20:00
Venerdì 09:00 - 20:00

Telefono

+393339062958

Sito Web

Notifiche

Lasciando la tua email puoi essere il primo a sapere quando Luciana Leo Osteopata pubblica notizie e promozioni. Il tuo indirizzo email non verrà utilizzato per nessun altro scopo e potrai annullare l'iscrizione in qualsiasi momento.

Contatta Lo Studio

Invia un messaggio a Luciana Leo Osteopata:

Condividi

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram