Spartan Health

03/23/2026

03/10/2026

🚨 Declassified 1951 CIA Report Shows Strong Similarities Between Parasites and Cancer—This Points Directly to Treatments Like Ivermectin

A declassified CIA document from February 1951 was marked CONFIDENTIAL and remained classified until 2014.

It summarizes a 1950 Soviet scientific paper and outlines clear biological similarities between malignant tumors and certain parasites, including intestinal worms.

Both thrive in low-oxygen conditions.

Both store large reserves of glycogen.

Both produce energy efficiently with very little or no oxygen present.

The report highlights several key points:

• Tumors and parasites function as "aerofermentors." They generate energy effectively in oxygen-poor settings and survive in nearly oxygen-free environments. This matches the low-oxygen cores commonly seen in solid tumors and the oxygen-limited conditions inside the gut where many parasites live.

• Early experiments tested compounds designed to target parasites and discovered they also impacted tumors. Examples include:

- Myracyl D, which treated parasitic infections such as bilharzia and demonstrated activity against malignant tumors.

- Guanozolo, which blocked nucleic acid production essential for DNA and RNA, slowing growth in both microbes and mouse tumors.

- Different mirror-image forms of Atebrin affected tumor tissues and parasites differently than healthy cells, indicating altered receptors in diseased states.

• Additional shared characteristics include unusual purine metabolism, modified proteins, and possible unique antigens that may contribute to cancer development.

These observations show that treatments effective against parasites can cross over to cancer because of the shared biology.

This directly aligns with the known actions of ivermectin, a powerful antiparasitic drug.

Laboratory studies and animal models demonstrate that ivermectin:

• Stops cancer cells from growing and spreading.

• Triggers programmed cell death in cancer cells.

• Blocks new blood vessel formation that tumors need to grow.

• Interferes with critical cancer signaling pathways.

• Enhances the effectiveness of chemotherapy in resistant cancer cells.

These effects appear across models of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, and many others.

Current developments strengthen the case:

• In early 2026, the National Cancer Institute confirmed they are conducting preclinical laboratory studies on ivermectin's ability to kill cancer cells, driven by accumulating evidence and strong public interest. Results are expected soon.

• Early human trials have begun combining ivermectin with immunotherapy agents for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, evaluating safety and initial signs of effectiveness.

• Peer-reviewed scientific reviews present ivermectin as a low-cost compound with a well-established safety profile at approved doses, making it a strong candidate for further cancer research.

This 1951 document, kept secret for over 70 years, combined with the growing body of modern research on ivermectin, shows that the metabolic weaknesses shared by parasites and cancer cells have been recognized for decades.

Affordable antiparasitic approaches that exploit these exact vulnerabilities are now under serious scientific scrutiny.

The implications are clear and urgent.

Simple, accessible strategies that target these shared biological features deserve immediate large-scale investigation.

03/09/2026

Scientists find living bacteria is literally inside kidney stones…

Breakthrough research identifies hidden bacteria inside calcium kidney stones, potentially rewriting the medical understanding of how these painful crystals form.

For decades, the medical community viewed calcium oxalate kidney stones—the most common variety—as simple chemical accidents where minerals crystallized from urine. However, a groundbreaking study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that these painful deposits are actually "biocomposites." Using advanced microscopy, researchers found living bacteria and protective biofilms embedded deep within the stone architecture. This suggests that microbes are not just bystanders; they may actively "seed" stone formation by providing a surface for minerals to accumulate, effectively trapping the bacteria inside as the mineral layers grow.

This discovery offers a crucial explanation for why many patients suffer from chronic stones despite dietary changes and standard medical care. Because bacteria can hide within the mineral structure, they often remain shielded from clinical tests and the body’s immune system, potentially fueling recurrent urinary tract infections. By shifting the medical focus from pure mineral chemistry to the role of microbial life, this research paves the way for innovative preventative treatments. Targeting the bacterial "seeds" involved in stone formation could finally provide relief for tens of millions of people worldwide who struggle with this debilitating and painful condition.

source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (2026). Intercalated bacterial biofilms are intrinsic internal components of calcium-based kidney stones. PNAS.

02/28/2026

02/25/2026

02/19/2026

02/15/2026

Repeal the protections given to vaccine manufacturers in the 1986 Childhooed Vaccine Injury Act.

For 40 years vaccine manufacturers have been immune to liability for any issues with their products/issues caused by their products.

For 40 years, pharmaceutical companies have been held liable for issues with any/all other products they create that cause issues. Issues like baby powder tainted with asbestos, baby food tainted with heavy metals, the op**te epidemic, and many other products whether they were contaminated, lied about or whether they did what they were supposed to do while causing other damage/disease/side effects. These companies have been sued, fined, shutdown, etc.. for how they marketed products and/or what those products did to people…. Except for vaccines.

For 40 years, if a vaccine had issues and caused injury or death; the injured party would have to sue the US Government. The injured party would have to go against the best federal attorneys that government can buy to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the vaccine harmed them/their loved one. If successful, the victim would then be compensated by the government with taxpayer dollars and nothing would happen to the manufacturer.

S

🚨 Senator Rand Paul Introduces Landmark Bill to End Federal Liability Shield for Vaccine Manufacturers

I am genuinely celebrating this development.

On February 11, 2026, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), with cosponsor Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), introduced S.3853—“A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to end the liability shield for vaccine manufacturers, and for other purposes.”

This legislation directly targets the broad civil liability protections granted to vaccine manufacturers under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.

That law established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP / “Vaccine Court”) and largely immunized manufacturers from design-defect lawsuits in both state and federal courts—protections no other pharmaceutical category in the U.S. enjoys.

If passed, S.3853 would remove these special immunities, holding vaccine manufacturers to the same product-liability standards that apply to every other drug and medical product company.

Injured individuals and families would once again have access to traditional civil courts and the ability to seek full accountability through the normal judicial process.

The bill is now before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) for review.

For 40 years, the 1986 framework has been defended as necessary to maintain vaccine supply and manufacturer participation.

At the same time, many—myself included—have long argued that this unprecedented shield has reduced incentives for safety improvements, limited public scrutiny of product risks, and left affected families with restricted recourse, especially when adverse-event reporting systems are widely acknowledged to capture only a small fraction of actual incidents.

Today’s introduction of S.3853 marks a serious, substantive step toward restoring transparency, market-based accountability, and equal access to justice.

It’s exactly the kind of principled, long-overdue reform I’ve hoped to see.

If you care about medical freedom, informed consent, parental rights, or simply believe no industry should operate above the law, now is the time to pay close attention.

Read the bill.

Contact your senators.

Follow its progress.

This is a moment worth celebrating, and worth fighting for.

🔗 Full bill text and status: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/3853

🔗 Full article: https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/rand-paul-introduces-federal-bill

12/03/2025

Measles is getting media attention again so let’s cover the truth behind it all.

The decline in mortality from measles was LONG before the 💉 vaccine. It was motivated by financial incentives from the government. Furthermore, the vaccine spreads the virus, and it contains female cells from an aborted baby. This is all right in the research:

“With the exception of some isolated population groups, almost all children contracted measles before they reached adolescence.

By 1960, thanks to the use of antibiotics and improvements in living conditions, measles mortality was declining steadily in industrialized countries (although not in the developing world). For example, in the United Kingdom deaths from measles had fallen from 307 in 1949 to 98 in 1959. Parents largely came to see measles as an unpleasant, although more or less inevitable, part of childhood. Many primary care physicians shared this view.”1

“In the United States and Western Europe, which did, measles mortality was low and declining and parents seemingly accepted it as an unpleasant part of childhood. What reasons could there be for introducing a measles vaccine? There seemed to be no reason to begin a mass immunization program…”1

Cue the financial incentives…

“In 1962 Congress passed the Vaccine Assistance Act, which authorized financial assistance to states specifically for vaccination programs against polio, diphtheria, whooping cough, and tetanus.”1

The introduction of a mass measles vaccination campaign was not based on a need for this intervention in developed countries like the U.S. as mortality had long been down before the vaccine. It was based solely on financial incentive from the government.

Columbia University even reported that there were other factors that were much more responsible for the decline in diseases than vaccinations:

“The main influences on the decline in mortality were improved nutrition. . . reduced exposure (from better hygiene). . . and, less certainly, immunization and therapy on the large number of conditions included in the miscellaneous group. Since these three classes were responsible respectively for nearly half, one-sixth, and one-tenth of the fall in the death rate, it is probably that the advancement in nutrition was the major influence.”2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In developed countries with access to proper sanitation and nutrition, naturally-acquired measles is very mild and provides lifelong immunity as well as other benefits.

“In the pre-vaccine era, when the natural measles virus infected the entire population, measles — “typically a benign childhood illness,” as Clinical Pediatrics described it — was welcomed for providing lifetime immunity, thus avoiding dangerous adult infections. In today’s vaccine era, adults have accounted for one quarter to one half of measles cases; most of them involve pneumonia, one-quarter of them hospitalization.

Also importantly, measles during pregnancies have risen dangerously because expectant mothers no longer have lifetime immunity. Today’s vaccinated expectant mothers are at risk because the measles vaccine wanes with time and because it often fails to protect against measles.”3

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The high risk of death and complications of wild measles is because of one missing nutrient. And that missing nutrient is generally only a problem in third world countries.

The World Health Organization has it listed right on their website that measles is more prominent in areas where the population is deficient in Vitamin A and that they recommend treating measles with vitamin A.

We have access to beef, beef liver, cod liver oil, butter from grass-fed cows, etc. that are absorbable protective sources of Vitamin A. Nourishing our children with these nutrients is more effective than any injection, especially one that carries serious risks and contains cells from an aborted baby.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The MMR vaccine is made from and contains DNA from aborted fetal cells.

The rubella portion of the vaccine was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted baby and sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak. Researchers were unable to culture rubella from the tissues of the first 26 fetuses sent to Wistar, which had been aborted by doctors because the mothers had rubella during pregnancy.

WI-38 in this vaccine is derived from lung tissue of a 3-month-gestation female fetus.

(Note: There are serious implications for injecting female cells into a male baby…)

Note: These women were told their babies would die due to the mother having rubella, so they agreed to abortion for "medical research." The first 26 babies were found to not even be affected by rubella, meaning they would have been born perfectly healthy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Furthermore, the vaccine actually spreads the disease in a mutated form. Measles virus is passed around by secondary transmission from newly-vaccinated people as well:

“Measles virus RNA has been detected in the urine of the vaccinees as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after vaccination. Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.”4

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

REF:

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4007870/

2.http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/pubhealth/rosner/g8965/client_edit/readings/week_2/mckinlay.pdf

3. https://financialpost.com/opinion/lawrence-solomon-the-untold-story-of-measles

4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC228449/

11/28/2025

11/22/2025

11/15/2025

11/15/2025