Ron R Wilkinson, PhD, PC

Ron R Wilkinson, PhD, PC Anxiety paralyzes. Depression saps energy and enthusiasm. Fear creates avoidance. Conflict Seems to never end. You are, after all, the expert on yourself.

When this happens, your life and relationships suffer, robbing you of a sense of joy and ease in your daily life. Dr. Wilkinson offers insight, guidance and direction. With 20 plus years of experience and extensive ongoing education and training, I bring expertise on human behavior and problem-solving to help you acheive your goals. I ask that you bring motivation and knowledge of yourself. Togeth

er, as a team of experts, we will solve the problems that hold you back from enjoying a satisfying and productive life.

09/13/2022

I recently updated my contact information. Just to insure that the new info is out there, I am posting it here as well.

NEW PHONE: 214.282.5206

EMAIL: Ronrwphd@gmail.com

I have recently added COMET to my staff.  He is chief comforter.  Schedule and appointment with him. He will be glad to ...
03/12/2019

I have recently added COMET to my staff. He is chief comforter. Schedule and appointment with him. He will be glad to see you.

01/26/2017

YOU vs. I and PERCEPTION vs. FACTS

Arguments take place in every relationship. Partners in good relationships have a way of resolving differences. Partners in bad relationships have the same or similar arguments crop up time after time.

Lets look at two concepts involved in conflict resolution. The first can be characterized as making "You" versus "I" statements. A common yet useless, if not destructive, approach is for one partner to talk about the other in an argument. This can be described as making "you" statements. For example, "You lied to me". In this approach blame is frequent. When blamed, the listener often gets defensive or counter-attacks. The argument usually only gets hotter as blame, counter blame, and denial ensue. At best, apologies are offered. At worst, angry silence lasts for hours or maybe days with a gradual warm up occurring. Little is truly resolved either way.

A better approach is to use " I" statements. Talk about yourself, not the other person. Talk about how you feel. Talk about how your partner's words or actions affect you. In this instance, your partner is more likely to listen. "I" statements rarely evoke defensiveness, whereas "you" statements almost always do. I statements further conversation. "You" statements lead to ending conversations before the matter is resolved to the satisfaction of both parties. "I" statements make it more likely for the listener to be interested in what the speaker is saying. "I" statements foster curiosity. "You" statements often lead toward a conversation that looks more like a courtroom where guilt or innocence is decided rather than a couple trying to resolve their differences.

The second concept involves the distinction between perception and fact. Often times we treat what our partner says as a fact whose truth is to be debated. True or false? Who is right? Who is wrong? This, along with "you" statements, makes for angry, heated debates that rarely are truly resolved.

Far better to treat what our partners say as their perception--a perception that is valid and important. But, not a fact. In fact (pun is intended), I often say to my patients that "relationships are all about perception". That is not to say that facts don't exist. They most certainly do. Facts are best treated as something observable with our eyes, ears, and nose. This post is a fact, not a perception. Whether it has any value is a perception, however. Perceptions are what matter in our relationships. Understandably, we have to reference facts even when making "I" statements, but the facts are merely referenced. When we argue using "you" statements, the facts often become the main focus of the argument.
EXAMPLE: That your partner wrote you a letter of apology is a fact. Whether it was good or bad is perception. If you think your partner wrote the apology letter simply to get out of trouble, you will not be very happy. However, if you think the letter was written with full sincerity, you will probably smile and give your partner a hug or kiss. Either way, it is a fact that your partner wrote a letter of apology. It is the meaning intended and the meaning perceived that counts.

If we treat what we each other says as a perception, we can be curious. In a genuine way we can ask, "What have I done to make you feel like I don't love you?" This contrasts with sarcastic, denial-filled questions like "what have I ever done to make you feel like I don't love you?" Can you, the reader, hear the difference? The words are identical, but the tone of voice says it all. Try saying this sentence in one way, then again in the other. Listen for the difference in your own voice. One usually leads to more conversation. The other often leads to defensiveness. One leads to resolution. The other leads to more arguments and further estrangement.

In summary, when dealing with differences use "I" statements and focus on perception. Speak for and about yourself and leave your partner to speak for and about themselves. Avoid you statements. Focus on what words and actions mean to you and to your partner. Treat both perceptions with respect. Reference facts, yet make the facts less important than what they mean to you and to your partner. Speak to your partner in a way that induces them to be interested in what you are saying. Avoid speaking in a way that engenders defensiveness or denial. Respond to your partner in a way that encourages openness. Avoid defensive, counter-blaming responses.

Easy? No. Far from it. This approach requires mindfulness. It is very easy to blame and get defensive. That seems to come naturally. No thought is required. Rewarding? YES. Inevitably, it seems like the things that require hard work are more valuable. Applying good conflict resolution skills is hard work.

12/29/2016

WOULD YOU LIKE SOME SALT?
The following scenario would never happen in the way it is written, yet in a far less obvious way, it happens all the time. You and someone are eating dinner together. Without much thought, you ask your dinner companion "Would you like the salt and pepper?" It is a kind and thoughtful thing to do. They say "no thanks" and you both continue to eat. A bit of time goes by and you again ask if they would like the salt and pepper. And again, they say no. This repeats itself 3 more times. Finally, in frustration and with some resentment you say "pass me the damn salt and pepper". You feel unappreciated and insignificant. Your dinner companion is blind-sided and doesn't understand what just happened.
What your dinner companion failed to realize is that you were giving what you wanted instead of asking for it. We do that all the time. We rub someone's shoulders secretly wishing they would they massage ours. We initiate s*x wanting our partner to intiate sometimes. We say I love you wanting to hear the sentiment returned. Not that we always want what we are giving. Sometimes we truly give with no expectation of reciprocation. But, when we believe that "it doesn't count if I have to ask for it" and where "selfish is a dirty word", we dont have many other options. We can be selfless, but that rarely ever works long-term. With these two beliefs, we are left with "giving what we want" in hopes that the other person will figure out when it is truly a gift and when it is an expectation. I would instead recommend asking for what you want when you want it. Nobody has to figure anything out. Nobody is giving as they seethe with resentment. "Asking for what you want when you want it" actually works quite well. It is simple and straightforward. Try it. It may not have as much value if you ask for it, but I promise you will get a lot more of what you want and will get it more often when you want it.

10/30/2016

WHO AM I TO BE?

Stories are a wonderful way of teaching important lessons. Probably every parent has used a story to teach their child an important value. Teaching through the use of stories is such a strong, lengthy tradition amongst Hasidic Jews that there are books devoted exclusively to Hasidic teaching tales. That is where I found my absolute favorite teaching tale, Hasidic or otherwise. It may be one of the shortest stories ever told and goes as follows:

"Rabbi Zusya said, 'In the coming world they will not ask me, Why were you not Moses? They will ask me, Why were you not Zusya?'"

Two sentences from start to finish. Be yourself. You don't have to be fantastic or the best ever. Just being your ordinary, everyday self is enough. Be yourself, not Moses, not Jesus, not your Mother, not your grandfather, not executive of the year. You are called to be you and only you. And not even the best version of you. Just you, "warts and all", as we say, is enough.

Consider times and ways in which you might have tried to be "Moses" rather than yourself. Perhaps "parent of the year" rather than simply a good parent. Perhaps the "most valued employee" ever rather than someone who simply does their job? Has there been a price you have paid for this? Have you expected to receive something (perhaps recognition or gratitude) for this and it never materialized? How did you feel?

Consider what it would look like if you tried to be no more than who you are. Would there be an advantage to that? If so, what would be some advantages? Do you believe it would create problems? If so, what problems?

I would appreciate readers sharing some of their responses to these questions. It could make for a good therapeutic group.

10/07/2016

BETTER THAN GOLD. We all know the Golden Rule: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". The rule's intent is to be as good to others as we are to ourselves. When it comes to implementing this rule, however, we can run into problems. We like back scratches, so we scratch the back of someone we love, for example. Now, you might say, whats the matter with that? The story that follows illustrates how the Golden Rule can go bad despite good intentions.
While I was still dating my partner of 16 years, I would wash his clothes from time to time. I had a washing machine. He didn't. His dirty clothes piled up and were washed only when necessity demanded. Very much still in the honeymoon phase of our relationship, I was glad to do this simple task. One day the subject of my washing his clothes came up. In that conversation, I learned that my washing his clothes did not mean much to him. In fact, he found it a bit too much. My feelings were hurt and he felt bad for hurting my feelings since he knew I was only trying to be helpful. But, I had asked him to be honest and he was.
In reflecting on this, I realized I was doing something that failed to have its intended effect. I was giving him something that had meaning for me, not him. If someone had washed my clothes, I would have been delighted. It was the Golden Rule at its most literal. I was " doing unto him what I would have him do unto me". Most of us are probably guilty of this. Our intent is usually to be helpful or kind. But, is it really kind if the effect is negative? So, what do we do?
Use the PLATINUM RULE instead. It's better than gold. This rule suggests that we "Do unto others as they would have us do unto them". In other words, do something that actually has meaning for the person you are doing it for. In my earlier story, leaving his clothes alone would have been the answer.
Take a moment: Reflect on what you do for those you love and care about. Are you applying the Golden Rule by doing something that you value? If so, what could you do instead that would be in keeping with the Platinum Rule? Or, are you already applying the Platinum Rule by doing something you know the other person actually appreciates and values? If so, you get a "platinum star" (I almost said gold). Is someone who loves you giving you something that you would rather they not? If so, screw up your courage and find a caring way to let them know. What might you say? Do you believe you should say anything?
The spirit of the Golden Rule is great. The Platinum Rule, however, is far superior all the way around. Platinum acts of love are always appreciated. Golden acts of love run the risk of seeming intrusive, insensitive, or even controlling.
Then there is the matter of the giver feeling appreciated. Whether we should or not, most of us like, if not expect, appreciation for the kindnesses we do for others. When we give in keeping with the Golden Rule, we run the risk of not getting the appreciation we might want since we may be giving something we desire instead of what the receiver actually values. For example, Mom organizes her adult daughter's pantry as a surprise and is surprised herself when her daughter is angry because she feels as if she is being treated like an incompetent child. After all, who would express appreciation for something they really don't really appreciate.
If you don't know what your intended receiver would consider kind or thoughtful, ask. Then listen. Trust what they tell you, even if it is something that you would never appreciate. Even if it means, leave my clothes and pantry alone!! The point after all is to do something they, not you, value. That is what giving is really all about. The Platinum Rule always enhances relationships and makes the receiver appreciate the giver even more. Always!!
Please leave comments or questions. Also, SHARE this post on your news feed if you think there are others who might like to read this post. Thanks for taking the time to read my post. I appreciate it.

09/26/2016

TRIANGULATION. In a recent session with a couple, this dynamic presented itself. While sounding mathematical, Triangulation refers to something one or both partners in a couples relationship rely on when there is a real or perceived imbalance in power between the partners. The partner who feels less powerful will figuratively bring in a third person or entity to bolster their position. " My mother says . . . .". ; "The church says . . . .". ; "Our friends say . . . .". Sometimes the third person is literally brought in. For example, a couple might be temporarily living in one of the partner's parents' home while remodeling their own home. In the midst of an argument, one of them literally gets Mom or Dad involved. Couples who are adventuresome s*xually may find a "three way" fun. This kind of "three way" is never fun. It is ugly, controlling on the one hand, and desperate on the other.
RESOLUTION: Speak for and about yourself only. In other words, make "I " statements. This might sound constrained and artificial. In practice, though, it works very well. If it is a new way of communicating in a disagreement, it probably will feel constrained and artificial. But, I promise, it is effective and eventually feels norMal--even powerful, just not too much so. "I believe having a date night is important" is much more powerful than " that's what my parents always did and they have a good marriage".
"I want s*x more often" is more powerful and convincing than "my friends think you are a prude". Both of these statements demonstrate "triangulation".
Individuals who communicate in this way in their relationships rarely, if ever, feel the need to have a "triangulation" 3 way. The s*xual variety, well, that is a matter for a later post!!!
I hope this information is helpful to you and your relationship. I plan to post from time to time on subjects that come up in actual therapy sessions with my patients, but in a general way so as to never violate confidentiality. Please always feel free to leave comments or ask questions via Facebook or email at Ronrwphd@gmail. com.

09/21/2016

CATASTROPHIZING. Catastrophes can and do happen. Just pay attention to the news and you will hear of multiple, genuine catastrophes that have happened somewhere in the world often all in the same day. Catastrophizing though is a form of cognitive distortion employed by people who tend to "think the worst"---at least when it comes to their own lives. It involves thinking the worst will happen out of something that to most seems small or otherwise manageable. It can be triggered by the most innocuous of comments or events. This tendency often develops early in life in our formative years (i.e., childhood). Children who get in trouble due to their own misbehavior rarely develop the tendency to catastrophize. They know essentially that if I am behaving well, all is well. In contrast, some children get yelled at, punished, or abused because of a parent's bad mood. In such cases, there is no predictability. I behave and I get into trouble. i misbehave and I get in to trouble. I misbehave and I don't get into trouble. When a child cannot predict, that child starts to worry. That then sometimes carrys over into adulthood. EXAMPLE: You send someone an email. They don't respond at first, though they often do. You start to wonder. Has something happened? You send a follow-up email. They reply with "Busy. Can't talk". This person often has more to say, it seems. You start thinking that they might actually be upset with you for bothering them at work, or maybe upset about something you said last week. Your worry builds. You start to think the worst. And you do for a couple of days. Then, you finally hear from your friend who tells you how incredibly busy they have been and are in fact sorry for being unavailable earlier.
Some of you will read this and think that this scenario is ridiculous. But, some of you will read it and think "I do that. That's me. Omg!!" Granted, it rarely happens this simplictically. But, you and a boyfriend or girlfriend might be at odds with each other and you start thinking that not only will they leave you but that you will never, ever, have another partner again, and you will be old and miserable, and alone.
Now, everyone probably does this sometimes. Mental health is not based on never doing or thinking anything. Mental health is based on patterns that exist. REMEDY: You have to first realize that you do this. Then, you have to begin an effort to catch yourself as you do it. As you get good at catching yourself, you can then begin to engage in more realistic self-talk. I dont mean that you should be positive, as in "A break up will never happen". Being realistic might mean " If a break-up happens, I will be sad and lonely for a while, but will still have my friends and will eventually start dating again".
How to determine what is being realistic? I often say, "the truth is in the past". In other words, while anything can happen, what will likely happen is what has tended to happen in the past. That's what "history repeats itself" and "we should learn from history" means. If we learn from our own histories, we usually have more reason to be calm and confident than fearful. Should we be prepared for the worst? Of course. But, preparing for and predicting are two very different things.
IF YOUR EFFORT TO STOP YOUR TENDENCY TO CATASTROPHIZE DOES NOT WORK AS WELL AS YOU WANT, PLEASE GIVE ME A CALL TO SET AN APPOINTMENT. It would be my pleasure to help you resolve this most painful, agonizing pattern. If you are fortunate to not have this crippling tendency, good for you. SHARE THIS POST as someone you know and love probably does.

09/13/2016

TRIANGULATION. In a recent session with a couple, this dynamic presented itself. While sounding mathematical, Triangulation refers to something one or both partners in a couples relationship rely on when there is a real or perceived imbalance in power between the partners. The partner who feels less powerful will figuratively bring in a third person or entity to bolster their position. " My mother says . . . .". ; "The church says . . . .". ; "Our friends say . . . .". Sometimes the third person is literally brought in. For example, a couple might be temporarily living in one of the partner's parents' home while remodeling their own home. In the midst of an argument, one of them literally get Mom or Dad involved. Couples who are adventuresome s*xually may find a "three way" fun. This kind of "three way" is never fun. It is ugly, controlling on the one hand, and desperate on the other.
RESOLUTION: Speak for and about yourself only. In other words, make "I " statements. This might sound constrained and artificial. In practice, though, it works very well. If it is a new way of communicating in a disagreement, it probably will feel constrained and artificial. But, I promise, it is effective and eventually feels norMal--even powerful, just not too much so. "I believe having a date night is important" is much more powerful than " that's what my parents always did and they have a good marriage".
"I want s*x more often" is more powerful and convincing than "my friends think you are a prude". Both of these statements demonstrate "triangulation".
Individuals who communicate in this way in their relationships rarely, if ever, feel the need to have a "triangulation" 3 way. The s*xual variety, well, that is a matter for a later post!!!
I hope this information is helpful to you and your relationship. I planto post from time to time on subjects that come up in actual therapy sessions with my patients, but in a general way so as to never violate confidentiality. Please always feel free to leave comments or ask questions via facebook or email at Ronrwphd@gmail. com.

COMPASSION:   Something we often have in abundance for a friend or loved one who is facing a failure, disappointment, or...
09/02/2016

COMPASSION: Something we often have in abundance for a friend or loved one who is facing a failure, disappointment, or loss. We are quick to offer sympathy and support and we truly mean it. However, when we ourselves face similar circumstances, our own "inner self-talk" is often critical, blaming, and minimizing. "what an idiot I must be". "I am just a big failure".
EXERCISE: Imagine saying to a friend or loved one the things you say to yourself when problems occur. Reflect on how talking to them in that same critical way would affect them. Reflect on how it would change the relationship. Next, imagine talking to yourself in the same way you would talk to a friend in trouble. Reflect on how that might affect you? Imagine how it might affect your relationship with yourself more generally.
SELF-COMPASSION is what I am talking about. For all you might ever want and need to know about self-compassion, go to www.self-compassion.org. Read and explore the wisdom offered by Dr. Kristin Neff, whose research at UT focuses on Self-compassion.
Please leave comments and questions here.

Address

Virtual Sessions Only
Dallas, TX
75205

Opening Hours

Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+12142825206

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ron R Wilkinson, PhD, PC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Ron R Wilkinson, PhD, PC:

Featured

Share