09/25/2025
NURSES MATTER: WHY DO HOSPITAL LEADERS BEHAVE AS IF THEY DON'T?
UnityPoint Nurses’ Unionization Drive: A Battle for Safety, Voice, and Control
The ongoing effort by nurses at UnityPoint Health hospitals in Des Moines, Iowa, to unionize represents one of the most consequential labor battles in Midwestern healthcare in recent memory. On one side stand nearly 2,000 nurses, backed by Teamsters Local 90, demanding a collective voice to address what they call chronic safety risks, dangerous staffing shortages, and a lack of respect from management. On the other side is UnityPoint leadership, spending millions of dollars on consultants and legal advisers in a determined campaign to prevent unionization, framing the issue as a matter of preserving direct collaboration and operational flexibility.
What follows is a comprehensive look at both perspectives, the strategies at play, and what this struggle reveals about healthcare labor relations in 2025.
Why Nurses Are Pushing for a Union
The call for unionization is rooted in day-to-day realities on the hospital floor. Nurses are not citing abstract political motives but deeply personal experiences: violent encounters with patients and families, impossible patient loads, and the psychological burden of feeling voiceless in decisions that directly impact patient care.
Safety Concerns
Frontline nurses have reported repeated instances of workplace violence: being shoved, threatened, and having objects thrown at them—even during pregnancy. Some work in units where high acuity patients create volatile conditions, yet staffing levels leave them exposed. For these nurses, unionization is not about a theoretical “seat at the table,” but about survival and protection. They argue that management’s reassurances fall flat when they are the ones absorbing the blows.
Chronic Understaffing
Another recurring grievance is unsafe staffing ratios. Nurses report being assigned 10, 12, or more patients at once, far above what they consider manageable. This creates not only professional stress but a moral crisis. No nurse wants to feel they are shortchanging patients. Organizers argue that collective bargaining is the only mechanism powerful enough to secure enforceable staffing standards, which management has resisted implementing voluntarily.
Lack of Voice and Trust
For years, nurses say, they have raised concerns through “direct collaboration” channels only to see them ignored or met with token responses. Some describe advisory committees that feel more like public-relations exercises than genuine problem-solving forums. As a result, many have lost faith that management will act in good faith without a structural requirement to bargain.
Compensation and Retention
While wages and benefits are not the headline issue, they play a role. Iowa nurses often compare their pay and workloads unfavorably to colleagues in other states. Recruitment and retention challenges exacerbate understaffing, feeding a vicious cycle. Nurses believe that only a union contract can deliver competitive terms that keep experienced staff from leaving.
Power and Representation
Ultimately, the drive is about power. Nurses feel they lack meaningful leverage over decisions that shape their working lives and their patients’ care. Unionization, in their view, is the only way to shift the balance of power, secure legally binding commitments, and ensure their collective voice is not just heard but respected.
UnityPoint’s Resistance: Why Leadership Is Fighting Back
UnityPoint executives see the situation through a different lens. They argue that nurses already have ample opportunity to provide input, that unionization risks eroding flexibility, and that management—not outside organizations—should be trusted to run the hospitals. Their resistance is not passive but highly organized and resource-intensive.
Refusal of Voluntary Recognition
When nurses first asked UnityPoint to voluntarily recognize their union after demonstrating majority support through signed cards, leadership refused. Instead, they insisted that the matter be decided through a secret-ballot election overseen by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). UnityPoint frames this as a matter of fairness, ensuring that every nurse has an equal, private say rather than relying on signatures collected under peer pressure.
Big Money, Big Consultants
Perhaps the most striking element of UnityPoint’s campaign is the sheer scale of resources deployed. Estimates suggest the health system has spent between $3.7 million and $6.1 million on anti-union efforts so far. This money has gone to high-priced labor consultants, attorneys, and communications experts, many billing more than $400 an hour. UnityPoint justifies the expenditure as an “investment” in preserving direct collaboration with nurses. Critics call it union-busting on steroids.
“Education” and Persuasion
Nurses describe being pulled into group meetings and one-on-one sessions with consultants who present themselves as neutral educators. The stated goal is to “inform” nurses about what unionization entails, but organizers say the real intent is persuasion. Consultants warn that unions can reduce individual autonomy, impose dues, and create rigid structures that hurt flexibility. Management insists these meetings are not coercive but necessary to ensure informed decision-making.
Legal Posturing
UnityPoint has highlighted election rules requiring that nurses’ personal contact information—phone numbers, addresses—be shared with the union. Leadership uses this to sow privacy concerns, suggesting unionization could expose employees to unwanted contact. They also emphasize that only through elections, not card checks, can a union claim true legitimacy.
Meanwhile, they deny that they are engaged in unlawful surveillance or intimidation, even as union allies file unfair labor practice complaints.
PR and Framing
Publicly, UnityPoint strikes a conciliatory tone. Leaders praise nurses’ dedication, insist they care deeply about staff and patients, and frame unionization as unnecessary. The system argues that direct collaboration allows for quicker problem-solving and greater responsiveness than negotiating through a third party. They warn that collective bargaining could tie management’s hands, increase costs, and introduce conflict into what should be a collaborative relationship.
The Union’s Counterclaims
Union advocates argue that UnityPoint’s so-called “education” is classic union-avoidance. They point to mandatory “captive audience” meetings, suggest nurses are pressured into listening to anti-union talking points, and note that consultants are presented as friendly advisors when they are in fact specialists in blocking organizing campaigns.
LaborLab, a watchdog group, has filed complaints alleging that UnityPoint’s consultants may be violating disclosure rules under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act by failing to properly report their persuasion activities. If proven, this could carry legal consequences.
Teamsters Local 90 has also filed unfair labor practice charges, accusing UnityPoint of threats, surveillance, and interference. Whether regulators act swiftly remains uncertain, as the NLRB has struggled with backlogs and political pressure.
What Is at Stake
The stakes of this battle go beyond one employer and one group of nurses. Healthcare unions across the country are pushing back against chronic understaffing, burnout, and what they see as corporate prioritization of profits over care. At the same time, hospital systems—many operating on thin margins in a volatile industry—fear that unionization will increase costs, slow decision-making, and reduce control.
If UnityPoint nurses succeed in unionizing, it could inspire similar efforts in other Midwestern systems, where union density remains relatively low. Conversely, if UnityPoint defeats the effort, it may embolden other hospital chains to invest heavily in consultant-driven campaigns to keep unions out.
A Clash of Narratives
This fight, at its core, is a clash of narratives.
Nurses’ narrative: “We are unsafe, unheard, and overworked. Unionization is our only path to dignity, safety, and a voice.”
UnityPoint’s narrative: “We value our nurses, but a union is an outside force that will reduce flexibility, create conflict, and harm collaboration. Direct dialogue is better than third-party interference.”
Both narratives carry emotional weight. For nurses, the stories of violence and overload resonate deeply with the public. For management, the specter of rigid union contracts and higher costs taps into fears about the fragility of healthcare economics.
Conclusion: A Turning Point
As UnityPoint nurses prepare to vote in early October 2025, the outcome is far from certain. What is certain is that this campaign has already revealed the intensity of labor-management conflict in today’s healthcare system. Nurses feel pushed to the brink by safety and staffing crises. UnityPoint leaders, for their part, see unionization as a fundamental threat to how they run their hospitals.
The fight is not just about wages or dues but about who controls the terms of patient care. Whether nurses win their union or UnityPoint’s resistance prevails, the consequences will ripple beyond Des Moines. This is a battle about power, trust, and the future of healthcare work in America’s heartland.
Send a message to learn more
