03/19/2026
Ooooooh is this interesting! New article in the journal Birth (link below) entitled "Personal Birth Experiences and Clinician Attitudes About Cesarean Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study With Female Labor and Delivery Unit Staff" highlights a factor that can have a very real influence on people needing or choosing hospital care for their birth. The personal birth experiences of those on your birth team (nurse, physician, and/or midwife) "are associated with their attitudes about clinical practice." If they themselves have only had a cesarean in the past, their support for best practices to reduce cesarean birth is lower, they are more likely to overestimate cesarean safety, and have greater fears around vaginal birth.
This finding circles back to my prior posts about the important role that hospital culture plays in the degree to which your care team may practice in an evidence based manner. Bias TOWARDS cesarean section can change the team's "tolerance" for a slow labor or a baby who is "misbehaving" according to the fetal monitor. It will likely change the language they use when discussing a potential surgical birth. While cesareans are very necessary in some instances, being that around 33% of all births in our nation are now surgical, what do you think the likelihood is that someone on your hospital birth team carries bias that can have a direct impact on your birth journey?
This is one of the many reasons I shifted into home birth. Not because I wanted to make my clients' stories read like mine (ending in a vaginal birth). But rather that I am familiar with the complex layers of hospital power structures and cultures, and the degree to which they can have a detrimental impact on practice...no matter what a birth family wants or prefers.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/birt.70062?campaign=wolearlyview