02/02/2025
The Wheel of Awareness meditation is one way to connect with the Anima Mundi or World Soul Pir Elias writes about in the following https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-S2uk63xEH_NYwtz4sdGXlsS6xBMOKQs
Anima Mundi by Pir Elias Amidon
My hand moves this pen, leaving black ink on white paper. My room is cold on a winter morning, my stocking feet cool on the floor, this gray shawl warm on my shoulders. These are the signs of the world, the things in their particulars: hand, pen, ink, paper, shawl, shoulders. Even the movement of my hand, the coolness of the floor, the warmth of the shawl are “things,” so to speak, appearing as part of the presence of the world — appearing, appearing.
What magic! In this enigmatic universe with its star-clusters and nebulae and trillions of galaxies — what is it that has cared so much to bring about “hand, pen, ink, paper, shawl, shoulders?” What are these things? Why movement? coolness? warmth? What unspeakable, unknowable holiness dreamed them into being?
And then, that so-perplexing question: in what do they appear? In me? What is this “me” that is recipient of all these signs? I look, and look again, and whatever it might be, I come up empty-handed. “Unfindability inquiry” it’s called, an ancient form of inquiry found in all mystical traditions. My so-familiar “me” is… unfindable!
And yet, the particulars of the world keep appearing. If there’s no findable “me” to which they appear, then what’s happening? Hand, pen, ink, paper, shawl, shoulders, movement, coolness, warmth — how is it that they show up?
This kind of radical “nondual” inquiry usually leads at first to bewilderment — overturning the throne of the first-person singular — and then, if we’re lucky, to an astounding intuition or realization of an always-already-here, impersonal, unconditioned, all-pervading “presence-awareness” — a sort of background/foreground Awareness that’s everywhere, that’s not some kind of talent produced by my body, but a fundamental presence of Awareness that is the ground of all being and that’s as transparent as space. While there’s no “self” in it — it’s ungraspable, unsayable, and unconditioned — it is at the same time infinitely generous, the host of all that appears, which is why it is so often called love, love that's inseparable from the entire universe of conditions and things. If we are blessed with a glimpse of this numinous reality we realize with a joyous, relieving shock that our so-familiar “me” is nothing other than this all-pervading present-moment Awareness — a shock that propels us into realizing that we are free! naturally free within a “Great Belonging” that is already so.
It's a wonderful grace to glimpse this, even for a few moments at a time. It’s free medicine. It has the power to ease our infatuation with our problems, anxieties, and self-stories. Of course, they come back, but when they do they have a little less grip on our lives, and we begin to live more freely and lovingly.
But there’s a trap here. After the shocking intuition of our identity with this empty, open, all-pervading, loving awareness — once that recognition is no longer in-the-moment and it becomes a memory — our minds reify it as a kind of mysterious bliss “over there” that we now know about, a transcendent reality separate from this one, a place that we long to get back to but that has little to do with our everyday lives or any of the “things of the world.” In this way, what was recognized as the all-pervading ground, the “nondual basis of being,” becomes one element of a polarity — now there’s nonduality and duality, the transcendent and the imminent, heaven and earth, nirvana and samsara, the One and the many, contentless pure awareness and the “things of the world.” That’s the trap.
To avoid this trap we might try taking a closer look at the “things of the world” — hand, pen, ink, paper, shawl, shoulders, movement, coolness, warmth, looking to see where and how they “arise” in awareness. Are they pre-existing matter and energy-events waiting for awareness to notice them? Is there a “seam” between them and the awareness that is aware of them? Or is something else happening altogether?
I wonder — could it be that the “things of the world” are arising from the very nature of all-pervading Awareness, and that simultaneously, Awareness is arising from that very arising of the things? That the two are not separate? That they are one, sacred, simultaneous, event?
I know this is sounding terribly abstract, and in a way it doesn’t matter if we understand the ontology and relation of “things” and “awareness.” What does matter, I think, is that we look again at the things themselves, these endless appearances as they appear, and recognize that these “things” are just as numinous, holy, and wondrous in their appearance as is pure Awareness itself. These two — the “things” and “Awareness” — are not two!
When I’ve been lucky enough to see this, even for a moment, I get the feeling that the “things of the world” are ensouled with an alive presence, even in their transience. What’s more, it’s as if (and this may sound like a leap to you), it’s as if they are prescient with something, they want to tell us something — “the things of the world” have a gift. Perhaps we can get a hint of this by confessing that we too are among them, we too are of the “things of the world,” we arise in Awareness every bit as much as tree, or stone, or tower. Do we not have a gift too, along with all appearances? What is it we are prescient with? What does our “thingness” have to tell?
The ancients spoke of anima mundi, the soul of the world, and recognized that all things, all appearances, are expressions of this world soul. My sense is that the unity of “things” and “Awareness” that we’ve been contemplating, is exactly what they meant by anima mundi — that everything we perceive, and perceiving itself, is ensouled in some grand, generous, fecund mystery, the anima mundi.
Of course, we know full well that many things and appearances are unwholesome and life-denying, and we have every reason to question if they can be included in the “holy,” or “numinous.” Yes, they partake of the same mystery of arising as does perfume or a baby, but their affect is toxic and not wholesome. Perhaps what they have to tell us is this very affect of theirs — their unwholesomeness — so that we know the difference.
However that is, let us imagine for a moment that we are indeed embedded within, and arise from, the anima mundi. Hand, pen, ink, paper, shawl, shoulders, our thoughts, our feelings, our spirits — these “things of the world,” arising within the anima mundi, are ensouled with that anima and hold a promise. What is the promise of a tree? A table? A pottery jar? What is the promise of a human being?
Could it be that we’ve got reality wrong? That the “things of the world” are not dead matter that we can manipulate as we wish without losing our souls, and theirs?
I believe that when we realize the anima of “things,” their ensoulment and gift to us, we re-sacralize our world and bring it to life. And as we ourselves are indelible with this same anima — the numinous simultaneity of Awareness and Appearance — we naturally care. We care for the shape of the jar, the promise of the tree, the gift of the table. We listen to what they have to tell us, and they listen back! Then our lives are no longer a matter of making our way through belligerent and inanimate things, forcing them to obey our will. Instead we have the awesome responsibility to care with them, to bring forth their promise and ours, which may turn out to simply be the gift of beauty, this mysterious gift from the source we share with every blessed thing.
Learn about and practice the Wheel of Awareness, a profoundly healing contemplative practice developed by Dr. Dan Seigel through an understanding of neurosci...