05/22/2026
As we’ve said hours and hours of study and training. As a part of this association, I agree whole heartedly and yes we go through hours of training and regulation.
We were not able to attend the Zoom meeting live, but we were able to watch the replay provided by Colton Woods, and we are incredibly thankful that this was made available to the community.
Near the end of the meeting, several concerns were brought forward that we also feel need to be taken seriously.
One of the biggest concerns is the financial burden this could place on owners, ranches, rescues, and animal caretakers.
If an owner is required to involve a veterinarian every single time they want to bring out a bodyworker for wellness-based support, how is that realistic?
Veterinarians are already stretched thin in many areas. Many clients struggle to get appointments for urgent or necessary veterinary care, let alone additional appointments for wellness-based bodywork oversight.
There is also the question of affordability.
If someone is using massage, bodywork, acupressure, energy work, kinesiology taping, red light therapy, or similar wellness-focused modalities to support general comfort, maintenance, movement, relaxation, or quality of life, adding another required veterinary appointment creates another cost barrier.
For rescues, ranches, and multi-animal homes, that cost becomes even more unrealistic.
Another important concern is placing veterinarians in a position where they are expected to oversee modalities they may not be trained in.
Most veterinarians are not receiving in-depth training in holistic animal therapies during veterinary school. Many openly acknowledge that they do not have the education or confidence to determine when certain modalities are appropriate, especially when we start discussing more specialized areas such as osteopathy, chiropractic-style work, advanced bodywork, or energetic and meridian-based therapies.
So the question becomes:
How are veterinarians expected to oversee something they may not be trained in?
And why should their responsibility and liability be placed on the line for wellness-based services that are being performed by properly trained practitioners?
In many cases, this could create the opposite of what the industry needs. Instead of increasing collaboration, it may cause veterinarians to avoid involvement altogether because the liability feels too high. That creates another setback for animal wellness care, responsible bodyworkers, and the owners who are trying to support their animals in a thoughtful way.
What we believe needs to happen is not the removal of standards.
We believe the industry needs stronger standards.
Organizations such as IAHAP exist to help create that structure. We have strict assessment processes in place for who we call board certified, who receives specialty designation, and which practitioners or educational providers are approved through us.
We do not believe a practitioner should only be recognized if they attended one specific school, one specific educator, or one specific program that paid to be part of a system.
Instead, we assess the education itself.
We look at the program, the hours, the curriculum, the hands-on requirements, the case studies, the assessments, the scope of practice, and the professionalism behind that training.
If someone’s certification does not meet our standards, we do not simply shut the door on them. We help guide them toward a suitable pathway so they can continue building their education and move toward a higher professional standard.
This is not about gatekeeping.
This is about protecting animals, protecting owners, protecting qualified practitioners, and creating a realistic path forward for the industry.
We are not here to gain from fear or restriction.
We are here to support a pathway that encourages better education, clearer standards, responsible scope of practice, and stronger recognition for the practitioners who are doing this work properly.
The animal wellness industry is growing, and with that growth comes responsibility.
But regulation should not make care inaccessible.
It should not place unrealistic burdens on veterinarians.
It should not punish properly trained practitioners.
And it should not take wellness options away from the animals and owners who benefit from them.
There has to be a better way forward - and we believe that better way starts with education, accountability, professional standards, and collaboration.
We have a lot more to do behind the scenes and we still need to make more notes from the meeting.
This is what your membership supports - the hours and efforts put into CHANGE.
We will keep everyone updated as we learn more.