04/30/2026
“There is no data to support that.”
I have heard that line used to dismiss treatments, supplements, and procedures more times than I can count. And after 20 years in practice I want to tell you what it actually means most of the time.
It means nobody paid for the study.
Here is a real example from my own practice. I perform a procedure called a medial branch block and radiofrequency ablation on the spine. It targets the nerve that innervates the joints from the top of the spine all the way down to the tailbone. Insurance has covered it in the neck and the lower back for years because those areas were studied extensively and the data exists.
The thoracic spine — the mid-back — uses the exact same nerve with the same function. The anatomy is consistent throughout. But for years Medicare and most insurers refused to cover it there, citing a lack of supporting data.
So why was there no data? Not because the procedure did not work. I have a full roster of patients who paid out of pocket because it worked and they knew it. The data did not exist because there was no financial incentive to generate it. No pharmaceutical company profits from proving a procedure works. No academic career is advanced by studying a mid-back nerve block. So nobody studied it.
Medicare just changed its position this year and now covers it. The procedure did not change. The anatomy did not change. The money finally moved.
This matters enormously when evaluating nutrition, supplements, and emerging treatments. Absence of data is not evidence of absence. It is often just evidence of absent funding.
Keep that in mind every time someone uses “no data” as a conversation-ender. I will be coming back to this concept in future videos on nutrition and supplements.
Questions in the comments or sign up for the newsletter via the link in bio.