18/02/2026
The passing of Reverend Jesse Jackson has prompted national reflection on the power of coalition building and collective voice. Across decades of civil rights leadership, Jackson consistently emphasized that marginalized communities were strongest when they worked in alignment rather than isolation. His message centered dignity, shared struggle, and the belief that collective action could transform systems that had long excluded entire populations.
Jackson’s work was never confined to a single movement. He spoke to racial justice, labor rights, economic equity, disability inclusion, and voter empowerment as interconnected struggles rather than separate causes. His coalition model recognized that marginalization operates structurally, and that sustainable change requires partnership across communities navigating different, but overlapping, barriers.
That framework remains relevant today, particularly as diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives face growing political pushback. As DEI programs are challenged or dismantled, the question arises whether coalition work weakens without institutional backing. History suggests the opposite. When formal structures contract, grassroots alignment often expands, driven by communities who understand that shared advocacy creates stronger collective influence.
There is also an often overlooked dimension to coalition work rooted in neurodivergence. Research and advocacy history suggest that many organizers, reformers, and systems challengers have been neurodivergent, whether formally identified or not. Neurodivergent cognition often brings heightened pattern recognition, moral consistency, and sensitivity to injustice, traits that make systemic inequities more visible and more difficult to ignore.
Psychological research refers to this heightened response as justice sensitivity. For many neurodivergent individuals, inequity does not register as abstract policy debate but as moral incongruence. This orientation frequently draws neurodivergent advocates into movements focused on structural reform, where collaboration across marginalized groups becomes both natural and necessary.
Jackson’s coalition leadership anticipated these intersections long before contemporary language like intersectionality or neurodiversity entered public discourse. His Rainbow Coalition model brought together racially diverse, economically marginalized, and politically disenfranchised communities under a shared platform of equity. It demonstrated that collective voice could translate into cultural, political, and economic power.
Coalition energy continues to surface not only in political spaces but in cultural ones. Not long after the Super Bowl, global artist Bad Bunny, whose full name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, used one of the world’s largest stages not only to speak about believing in oneself, but to bring awareness to the realities facing Puerto Rico. His performance carried themes tied to colonial history, economic hardship, and the resilience of Puerto Rican identity.
That visibility mattered. For many viewers, it opened broader conversations about Puerto Rico’s political status, disaster recovery struggles, and long standing economic challenges that often receive limited attention in mainland discourse. Cultural platforms rarely center those narratives, which made the moment especially impactful.
Equally significant was the cross cultural response. Many within the Black community expressed visible support and excitement for his performance, recognizing both the cultural pride and the political messaging embedded within it. That shared celebration reflected how coalition energy can emerge through art, identity, and storytelling, not only through policy or protest.
These cultural moments mirror broader advocacy patterns. Disability justice movements led by activists of color have long emphasized that accessibility cannot be separated from racial and economic equity. Athlete activism, mutual aid networks, and cross community organizing efforts continue to demonstrate that collective power expands when movements align rather than compete.
While these conversations often unfold nationally, they carry direct relevance for regions like Southern Indiana. Across the counties and small towns of this region, numerous advocacy groups are working to address urgent needs. Disability organizations, recovery communities, mental health coalitions, racial equity advocates, housing groups, and rural health networks are each doing critical work.
Too often, however, this work happens in parallel rather than partnership. Organizations operate within mission specific lanes, addressing real challenges but without always recognizing how interconnected those challenges are. Fragmentation limits influence, while alignment expands it.
Coalition building does not dilute individual missions. It amplifies them. When disability advocates collaborate with mental health providers, when recovery groups partner with housing organizations, when racial equity leaders work alongside neurodivergent advocates, collective voice strengthens. Funding leverage increases, policy influence grows, and community reach widens.
There is also a lesson to be taken from the coalitions that already hold significant power at the regional level. Local businesses, political leadership, regional development authorities, Chambers of Commerce, and economic engines such as River Ridge operate through coordinated collaboration. Their alignment around shared economic goals has shaped infrastructure decisions, land use, workforce development, and investment priorities across Southern Indiana.
Their collective influence demonstrates how powerful coalition structures can be when resources, messaging, and strategy are unified. They understand that collaboration multiplies leverage, strengthens negotiating power, and accelerates outcomes. In many ways, their coalition model is what currently drives regional decision making.
The question then becomes why marginalized advocacy groups would not adopt similar alignment. If economic development organizations can coordinate across jurisdictions and sectors to advance shared interests, community advocacy networks can do the same to advance equity, access, and social infrastructure.
Many marginalized communities in Southern Indiana are navigating shared stressors. Limited access to healthcare, transportation barriers, workforce shortages, and economic strain affect multiple populations at once. Recognizing those overlapping pressures creates opportunities for collaboration that are both practical and sustainable.
This is where the legacy of leaders like Reverend Jesse Jackson becomes locally instructive. His coalition model was never meant to remain on national stages alone. Its true power lies in local adoption, in communities recognizing that shared struggle can produce shared influence when voices organize together.
The lesson is not theoretical. Regions with fewer resources often benefit the most from coalition alignment because collaboration maximizes capacity. Shared events, shared advocacy campaigns, shared policy initiatives, and shared public education efforts create stronger infrastructure than isolated work ever could.
At its core, coalition work reflects a simple but powerful principle. Equity for one community strengthens equity for all. Collective advocacy does not divide power, it multiplies it.
As conversations about representation, inclusion, and community voice continue to evolve, the question is not whether coalition building matters. The historical record has already answered that. The question is whether local communities are willing to recognize their shared potential and organize around it.
Reverend Jesse Jackson’s life demonstrated that when marginalized groups align, culturally, politically, and socially, they generate influence far beyond what isolated movements can achieve. From civil rights platforms to cultural stages, from national organizing to regional advocacy, the pattern remains consistent.
Power grows when people move together. In places like Southern Indiana, where advocacy networks are strong but often siloed, recognizing that shared power may be one of the most important steps toward building lasting community voice.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AfhdMPBR1/?mibextid=wwXIfr
The passing of Rev. Jesse Jackson has prompted national reflection on the power of coalition building and collective voice.
