02/13/2026
ERP can be life-changing for OCD — but for neurodivergent clients, how we deliver ERP matters just as much as what we deliver.
Many autistic and ADHD individuals come into treatment with a higher baseline level of anxiety and sensory stress. That doesn’t mean ERP isn’t appropriate — it means ERP needs to be more intentionally accessible.
A few clinician reflections:
🧠 Regulation first, not as avoidance
Supporting sensory needs (headphones, lighting, movement breaks, predictable structure) can reduce nervous system overload so exposures are actually possible. Regulation isn’t “safety behavior” by default — it can be the foundation for engagement.
📍 Rethink SUDS measurement
Instead of relying only on a 0–10 numerical scale, consider co-creating personalized anchor points:
“mild tension”
“buzzing overwhelm”
“shutdown risk”
“I can stay with this”
Client-defined labels are often more meaningful than abstract numbers.
🤝 Collaborative, values-aligned hierarchies
Exposure hierarchies work best when they’re built with the client, not imposed on them — and when they connect to what OCD steals from their life: autonomy, connection, parenting, creativity, justice.
🧩 Be careful not to pathologize autistic routines
Not every repetitive behavior is a compulsion. Some routines are regulation, predictability, or accessibility. ERP should target OCD rituals — not autistic coping strategies that aren’t driven by obsessional fear.
The goal is sustainable ERP: consent-based, neurodiversity-affirming, and rooted in functioning and values — not “white-knuckling through.”