
09/13/2025
I just read this article: “We Need to Double Down on Harm Reduction, Not Walk Away From It”, it argues that we’re making progress on the overdose crisis, but only because tools like naloxone distribution, syringe service programs, medications for opioid use disorder, & housing-first strategies are being used. 
Here’s the thing: overdose prevention centers (OPCs) are one form of harm reduction that’s often misunderstood. They don’t enable drug use. They save lives. For example, OnPoint in NYC has reversed nearly 2,000 overdoses since 2021. 
Why Rochester needs them:
• Because people are dying here, just like in other cities.
• Because having a place where overdose can be prevented safely, with medical staff, clean supplies, even pathways to treatment, that matters.
• Because harm reduction doesn’t abandon people, it meets them where they are.
• Because investment in what works saves more in healthcare, policing, and grief than ignoring the problem.
If you’ve got doubts, totally fair. I once had some myself. But what if we judged policies by how many lives they could save, not by our discomfort with the topic? If you care about neighbors, families, safety, maybe give this a read.
https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/harm-reduction-drug-policy
Would love your thoughts. How do you think a center like this would work (or not) in Rochester?
We have come too far to turn our backs on what works when it comes to sound, life-saving drug policies. Now is the wrong time to politicize practical, proven responses to this medical emergency.