I CARE ABOUT Myself (2026)

10/02/2026

Ethics Doesn't Fail in Big Decisions. It Fails at the Scroll.

January 26th. 6:47 AM. Ahmedabad.

Republic Day songs drift through the window. Patriotic. Loud. Insistent.

Pigeons have found the gap in the bird net again. Chirping. Persistent little things.

Black coffee. The aroma hits before the taste—warm, bitter, clarifying.

I open my laptop.

Abstract deadline: January 31st. Five days away.

Results checked. Code outputs verified. The title stares back at me. Ready for final review.

And here's where I usually negotiate.

"Let me just check that new Gemini feature." "One quick scroll through LinkedIn." "Did the market open strong today?"

Ten tabs. Thirty minutes. An hour.

The abstract waits. I've been writing it for weeks. Or rather, delaying it for weeks.

This pattern isn't new.

I've delayed presentations. Delayed publications. Delayed implementations for years.

Always with good reasons. Important reasons.

"I need to feel clear first." "Let me read one more paper." "I'll start once I have uninterrupted time."

But this morning—something different.

Phone: other room, silent mode.

Browser tabs: closed. All of them.

No Gemini tutorials. No visceral fat reduction tips. No certification courses calling with their shiny promises.

Just this: the abstract. The title. The reviewer's imagined questions.

Do you think this is meaningful? Relevant in LMIC contexts? What are the limitations we're not addressing?

I start typing. Devil's advocate against my own work.

Not motivated. Not ready. Not clear.

Just... starting.

Twenty minutes in, something shifts.

Not dramatic. Quiet.

Momentum.

The resistance that felt like a wall—now feels like water. I'm moving through it.

Thirty minutes. The abstract takes shape.

Forty-five minutes. First draft complete.

I lean back. Coffee is cold now. Pigeons gone quiet.

And I realise: I've seen this before.

Not with writing. With exercise.

How many mornings have I not wanted to work out?

Most of them.

But here's what I've learned: five minutes of warm-up changes everything.

The reluctance doesn't disappear—it transforms.

Into determination. Into momentum. Into something that carries itself forward.

I didn't need motivation to start exercising. I needed to start exercising to find motivation.

The same thing happened this morning.

Action didn't follow clarity. Action created it.

I'd read this in books. Heard it from mentors.

But knowing something intellectually and feeling it in your body are entirely different.

That morning, I felt it.

Here's where this becomes about ethics, not just productivity.

Because ethics isn't only about right and wrong. It's about honouring commitments.

When I accepted that abstract deadline—when I agreed to present this research—my attention became part of that agreement.

Not just the final submission. The hours leading up to it. The focus. The presence.

Scrolling instead of engaging isn't immoral.

But it is a quiet breach.

Not of rules. Of integrity.

Because every time I open that tab, every time I negotiate with myself—"just five minutes"—I'm choosing short-term relief over long-term alignment.

In medicine, this is obvious.

We don't delay difficult conversations because they're uncomfortable. We don't continue futile treatment just because stopping feels hard.

We call avoidance what it is.

But in daily life, we're gentler with ourselves.

"I need to reset first." "Let me check this one thing." "I'll start when I feel ready."

Ethics erodes not through wrongdoing—but through repeated postponement of responsibility.

Small breaches. Daily negotiations. Invisible compromises.

Until one day you look up and realise: years have passed.

The presentation you meant to give. The paper you meant to publish. The practice you meant to implement.

Still waiting. For readiness that never quite arrives.

So I changed the frame.

Not motivation. Not discipline.

Just this: "For the next 20 minutes, I am on duty."

Like entering the operating theatre. You don't wait to feel ready. The patient is there. The clock is running.

Clarity follows entry. Not the other way around.

One more practice—uncomfortable but honest:

When the urge to scroll appears, pause.

Ask: What exactly am I avoiding right now?

Confusion? Fear of poor output? Fear of being exposed as not knowing enough?

Name it.

Then act. Imperfectly.

Because commencement doesn't require confidence. It creates it.

I'm not saying this is fixed now.

It's not a straight line. More like the stock market—ups and downs, corrections and rallies.

Some days I still scroll. Still avoid. Still negotiate.

But the trend line? Pointing up.

Step by step. No guilt. No regret for the years of delay.

Just recognition: every time I choose to commence over waiting—I'm building a different pattern.

Not heroic. Not dramatic.

Boring, actually.

Daily. Unseen. Ordinary.

The pigeons came back through the gap three days later.

I heard them. Smiled. Kept typing.

Small breaches work both ways.

Sometimes you close the browser tabs. Sometimes you leave the phone in another room. Sometimes you start before you're ready.

And sometimes—most times—that's enough.

Ethics isn't a big decision.

It's twenty minutes of attention.

Given honestly.

Again and again.

What are you avoiding right now?

What would happen if you just... commenced?

17/01/2026

You can’t have proximity without friction. If it doesn’t hurt, you’re too far apart.

We’ve been conditioned to view "peace" as the ultimate relationship goal. We treat a lack of conflict as a badge of honor.
It isn’t. Often, it’s just distance masquerading as harmony.
In the physical world, two objects cannot occupy the same space without friction. Relationships follow the same law. If you are truly close to someone—sharing space, values, and a future—you will rub each other the wrong way.

The "Peace" Trap
Most people avoid the "messy" conversations because they fear the emotional outburst. They prioritize a quiet house over a truthful one. But this "peace" comes at a devastating price: Individual Erasure.
When you stop speaking about your non-alignments to avoid "making a scene," you aren't being mature. You are withdrawing. You are deciding that the person across from you isn't strong enough to handle the real you.

The Audit of Intimacy
A relationship is built on three pillars:
* Opinions: Your individual sovereignty.
* Alignments: Your shared bridge.
* Non-alignments: The tension that proves you’re still two distinct people.
If you don't have the courage to test that tension, you don’t have a partnership; you have a hostage situation where the truth is the ransom.

The Reality Check
Yes, confrontation is clumsy. It’s loud. It’s unpolished. There may be moments of aggression or heat. This isn't a sign of failure—it’s the "startup cost" of radical honesty. It’s the sound of two people actually touching.
If you cannot survive a confrontation with your "inner circle," how "inner" is that circle?
Real intimacy isn't found in the absence of conflict. It’s found in the wreckage of a disagreement that you both decided was worth cleaning up.
Stop protecting the peace. Start honoring the truth.

16/01/2026

The Year I Learned to Sit at the Edge

The guide spoke quietly in the December darkness. "No torches. Artificial light creates fog."

I didn't understand until we started walking. Every time someone pulled out a phone, a haze appeared in front of us—bright, disorienting, making the path disappear. But in pure moonlight, our eyes adjusted. Five minutes. Ten. The forest floor revealed itself. Roots. Rocks. The silver path ahead.

Abu, late December. My wife, friends, and their families. We walked through the forest, listening to insects settle and birds find their nests. The moon was enough.

I didn't know then that this would become the metaphor for everything 2025 had been trying to teach me.

January started with movement.

Odisha first. Then Chennai. Mumbai. Different hospitals, different people, different cultures. As a new NABH assessor, I was learning that quality has different definitions depending on where you stand. Their protocols. Their constraints. Their version of excellence.

The training had taught me: you're not just an assessor. You're a facilitator. Part of their quality journey.

Quality is a journey, not a destination. It struck me then—this applies to everything. My own growth. The work. All of it. You don't arrive. You just keep searching, refining, moving.

April. The bigger shift.

Relocation from Siliguri to Gujarat. By May, I'd joined the hospital in Vadodara. Living alone again—weekdays in Vadodara, weekends travelling home on expressways. Monday through Friday: stillness, routine, the contained life of work. Saturday and Sunday: highways, movement, the pull between two places.

That is life now.

Meanwhile, Doctors AI. Journal club presentations. Then something I'd never done: my first oral presentation at a conference. Topic: the LMIC problem in AI validation.

The world is racing toward AI tools, algorithms, and new metrics. But most of it felt like buzz—not solutions. I couldn't ignore it. If the metric is false, 90% accuracy means nothing. Zero clinical utility. You can't troubleshoot a patient like you debug code.

Western AI models don't translate to India, to low- and middle-income countries. The data is different. The context is different. But nobody's talking about that gap.

So I started talking about it. LinkedIn posts. Journal articles. Dissecting the studies, questioning the hype. It was the fastest way I knew to learn—by engaging, challenging, and building a critical lens.

The Outskill AI accelerator course came next. Not just learning tools—building them. Voice journaling app through Emergent. Third prize. Custom GPTs. Making AI work for the actual workflow, not just collecting courses.

Then MBA. First semester. Student again.

It felt productive. Like I was building something real—finding my niche at the intersection of oncology, AI, and healthcare equity.

But underneath, something else was building.

August. September.

The AI tools started buzzing louder. Every week, something new. A certification course. A breakthrough method. Someone's success story with a tool I didn't know existed.

What should I learn? What am I missing?

The panic wasn't during the day. I could focus, then work, create. It came at night.

Scrolling YouTube channels. Checking course websites. This one might be the key. That one might be the pathway I need. Sleep was delayed not by insomnia but by FOMO—the feeling that while I was resting, someone else was learning the thing that would matter.

I'd fall asleep past midnight. Wake up with the tasks undone, the day already behind.

The paradox: I was implementing more than ever. Voice app. Custom tools. Real projects, not just theory. But the external noise kept creating internal panic.

I was flooding my path with artificial light, creating my own fog.

Article content

December 27th. Morning trek.

The path got steeper. Rocks. Cactus thorns taught me to lean on stone instead of my knees. The scratch absolute, the lesson immediate.

But the forest had its compensations. Flowers I couldn't name—small, scattered along the path. Their scent cut through everything. Sweet. Relieving. The kind of smell that makes you forget the small scratches, the tiredness in your legs. Fascinating how something you can't identify can still soothe.

Then we reached the hanging cliff.

High. Exposed. Something about the elevation, the way the ground fell away, the gravitational pull—it created discomfort I hadn't expected. Not fear exactly. Just an uncomfortable truth: I've reached my limit.

I could walk to the edge. I could sit. But standing there, looking down, continuing those last twenty meters—no.

So I sat.

Breathe. Adjust. Stand again.

The return was fine. No problem. Just knowing my edge made it easier to navigate.

Later that day, a smaller cliff. Different angle, lower height. I can do this. And I could. Walked to the tip. Sat there. The view is just as real, the accomplishment just as valid.

Resilience isn't forcing through every uncomfortable edge. Sometimes it's sitting until you can stand. Sometimes it's choosing the cliff you can actually manage.

The year had been teaching me what to release.

I used to be frank with everyone. What I thought, I said. What I was working on, I shared. Open book. No filters. I thought that was authenticity.

But frankness without discernment isn't authenticity. It's just noise.

Some people misinterpret. Some manipulate. Some take what you share and create a mess you don't need.

I started closing doors. Not everyone should know what I'm doing. Not because of secrecy, but because not everyone has earned that access. The work will speak when it's done. The results will arrive when they're ready.

Decluttering. Space. Courses that don't serve. Relationships that don't matter. The realisation that some threads need cutting, not just loosening.

And the harder lesson: stability is temporary.

The MBA class on contingency planning felt academic until it wasn't. Friends are receiving termination letters without warning. Systems revealing themselves as temporary, not permanent. The understanding that security isn't given—it's built.

Second income source. Third income source. Not side hustle culture. Survival intelligence.

You never know when the ground shifts. Be prepared.

Article content

The sunrise came quietly.

We waited at the smaller cliff, the one I could manage. The sky shifted from dark to grey to gold. Birds. Silence underneath the chirping. Clear air. Unpolluted view.

You can look directly at the sun in those first moments. No pain. Just light.

I thought about 2026 sitting there.

No resolutions. No FOMO. Focus on what really matters.

Health—because everything depends on the body holding up. Mind—because clarity is worth more than accumulation. Relationships—real ones, not digital networks. Not colleagues masquerading as friends. Family. The few people who matter when the rest falls away.

Financial security—building what can't be taken by a single letter or shifted system.

And the work: dissecting the AI papers that matter. The oncology studies. The ones addressing real problems, not just generating buzz. Doing something meaningful, not just collecting citations.

Maybe most importantly: stop proving. Not to others. Not even to yourself.

Just do what matters. Let the artificial lights turn off. Trust your eyes to adjust.

Life teaches you to move on. Not because moving on is easy, but because standing still in the fog is harder.

2025 taught me accumulation and release in the same breath. What to build. What to let go. When to sit at the edge. When to try a different cliff.

The difficult trekking path leads to the clear view—but only if you stop creating fog with your own light.

I'm walking into 2026 by moonlight.

Eyes adjusted. Path visible. One step, then another.

No torches needed.

23/12/2025

Saturday Afternoon: When a Movie Becomes a Mirror

Saturday afternoon. Post-lunch. My wife scrolling through options, me scrolling through options. That modern paralysis where you have infinite choices and zero conviction about any of them.
I'd asked Gemini for something like The Intern - that warm, competent movie where everything works out and nobody yells. It suggested Late Night, a 2019 film about a talk show host played by Emma Thompson. Ninety-nine rupees to rent. Three hours to commit.
We almost kept scrolling.
Thank god we didn't.
I settled into the reclining chair, expecting pleasant distraction. Somewhere halfway through, I realized I wasn't reclining anymore. I was upright. Completely still. Arrested by what I was watching.
It's been months since a film did that to me. That physical sensation of being grabbed - not by spectacle, but by recognition.

The moment that made me sit up:
Katherine Newbury - legendary late-night host, pioneer, first woman in her field - finally meets her writers. Actually meets them. After twenty-seven years of working together.
She can't be bothered learning their names. Too much information. Not relevant to the work. So she assigns them numbers instead. One, two, three, four.
Then Burditt, the veteran, says hello. She brightens. "Burditt! Thank god. How's your baby?"
"She's 27."
That pause. That pallor on Emma Thompson's face.
Twenty-seven years. She'd asked about his baby once, never followed up. The baby grew up, became an adult, and Katherine had no idea because she'd never had another actual conversation with him.
Later: another writer mentions his father worked on the show before him. Family legacy. Katherine has zero awareness. Doesn't know the basic stories of the people who make her show possible.
She'd built everything on distance. Intellectual sharpness. Professional armour. It worked for decades.
And then it didn't.
Because the world had moved. Younger audiences wanted vulnerability, not just wit. Personal stories, not just clever observations. Connection, not performance.
Her show was dying not because she'd gotten worse - because she'd stayed exactly the same while everything shifted.

And I sat there thinking: I'm watching this happen. Right now. In my actual life.
The residents.
Not one incident. A pattern I've been observing for three, four years now.
They follow orders. They don't push back with questions. They don't ask why.
Why is the protocol this way? Why are we choosing this approach? What's the principle underneath?
I have to make them feel curious. Have to actively work to ignite something that used to light itself.
These questions used to be automatic. The natural reflex of someone who wants to understand, not just execute. Now? Silence. Compliance. Just tell me what to do.
The curiosity is deteriorating.

AI is everywhere now.
Not just present. Everywhere. A buzzword beaten to death. "AI with human in the loop" - propagated endlessly like it's profound insight instead of marketing language.
Obviously there are real advances. Genuine utility.
But mediocre courses, mediocre papers, mediocre publications are flooding everything. They're drowning out the good quality research, the things you should actually know to move forward.
And I'm sitting here thinking: Am I doing the right thing? Am I in the right direction?
When mediocrity drowns quality, how do you maintain standards? When everyone's adapting to the trend, how do you know if you're rising above it or just being swept along?

Social media.
It's getting more political. More violent. More chaotic. People using it as a tool to express their bad feelings, their rage. Everyone expecting everyone else to protest about something. Every day a new cause demanding your attention, your performance of caring.
And TV news follows social media now. Social media follows TV news. They feed each other in this loop of toxicity and outrage. Entertainment has become drastically toxic. Vulgar.
The thing is: even if you don't want to watch, your feed is loaded with it. Your ads are loaded with it. You unsubscribe. You unfollow. Doesn't matter. The algorithm pushes it in front of you anyway.
You've lost control of your own feed. Of what enters your mind.
The tools are controlling you now.

This is what Late Night kept forcing me back to:
In a world changing this fast - where residents stop asking questions, where AI is noise drowning signal, where algorithms force toxicity into your vision - how do you adapt without losing yourself?
Katherine lost control by refusing to adapt. By being rigid. By maintaining distance for twenty-seven years.
Her rigidity made her obsolete.
But adapting is terrifying because you don't know if you'll survive it.
Her transformation required cracking open everything. Confessing her affair on air. Admitting her depression. Showing vulnerability instead of armor. Learning her writers' names and stories. Giving up the control she'd maintained for decades.
It worked. Her audience chose empathy.
But what if they hadn't? What if her vulnerability had been the ammunition used to destroy her?
The film gives us the Hollywood ending. Reality is messier.

The residents are adapting by using available tools. Why spend three hours wrestling with a question when AI answers it in three minutes?
But there's a difference between using AI to enhance your thinking and letting AI replace your thinking. Between controlling the tool and being controlled by it.
Katherine's writers stopped thinking creatively because the formula worked. Until it didn't. Until the formula itself became the problem.
When I'm drowning in mediocre AI courses trying to find quality, when I'm asking "am I going in the right direction" - is that wisdom or paralysis?
The social media algorithm has already won. It controls what I see even when I actively resist. I've adapted by checking less, engaging less. But I haven't figured out how to rise above it. I'm just withdrawing.
Is that control or surrender?

We can't be Katherine at the beginning - rigid while everything shifts. Maintaining distance and calling it professionalism. Doing what worked for twenty-seven years and expecting it to keep working.
But we also can't surrender to every change. Can't let tools rewire us without resistance. Can't adapt so completely we lose our shape.
Katherine gave up old control - the distance, the armor, the numbers - to find new control. Control through connection instead of separation. Through vulnerability instead of performance.
It worked for her. In the film.

But I'm still in that chair that became upright. Still holding the question.
How do I teach residents to stay curious when answers are immediate? How do I stay focused on quality work when mediocrity is everywhere? How do I engage with social media without being controlled by algorithms designed to manipulate attention?
Katherine's transformation required giving up control to regain control differently. A gamble.
I'm still trying to figure out my own path between rigidity and surrender. Still asking: how do we rise above what's changing us instead of drowning in it?
Late Night didn't give me answers. It gave me the right question - and that physical experience of recognition that made me sit completely still for the first time in months.
Ninety-nine rupees. Three hours. Saturday afternoon.
Worth every rupee.

07/12/2025

Swimming Across the Tide: Why I Stopped Trusting the Hype and Started Auditing the Code

5:15 AM. Ahmedabad airport.
I reached at 4:40. Too early, but I prefer the margin.
Now I'm walking past Gate 7 with a Spanish latte in one hand—oat milk, lactose intolerance—and a marble cake in the other.
There's a quarrel happening near the check-in counter.
Flight cancellation. Raised voices. The usual chaos of disrupted plans.
I keep walking.
Everyone else is running.
New boarding announcement. New gate. New panic.
And I'm watching this and thinking:
This is exactly what's happening with AI.
A new track opens.
Everyone sprints toward it.
No map. No destination.
Just the certainty that not running means being left behind.
A mission without vision.
Blinding ourselves with artificial eyes.
So I stopped running.
I turned.
And I started swimming across the tide.
Because the only way to see what's real
is to step out of the stampede
and look at it from the edge.

1. The Jagged Frontier of Competence: The Illusion We Refuse to Question
We tell ourselves a simple story:
AI gets smarter → We get better.
But reality is crooked.
The Harvard–BCG "Jagged Frontier" study demolished the fantasy.
AI boosted creative tasks by 40%, but crushed complex reasoning by 19%.
Why?
Because humans surrendered vigilance.
They trusted the machine more than their own mind.
In oncology, a 19% drop in complex problem-solving isn't "variance."
It's mortality.
Speed is not intelligence.
And replacing scrutiny with convenience is not progress.

2. The Synthetic Knowledge Bubble: Eating Our Own Tail
More than half the internet is now AI-generated.
Models are training on regurgitated text.
An echo chamber stretching across the entire digital universe.
Researchers call it Model Collapse.
I call it intellectual decay.
Train a model on its own output for a few generations and the tails disappear—
no rare insights, no edge cases, no originality.
If I rely on this average intelligence,
I slowly become an average surgeon.
But surgery is won on the edges—
on the unexpected, the ambiguous, the asymmetrical.

3. The Counter-Strategy: I Use AI to Attack Me, Not Replace Me
I am not a Luddite.
I am a ruthless implementer.
Every week, I run a Perplexity automation.
It scrapes the latest AI developments in oncology and surgery.
Feeds them to me in a digest.
I'm not reading to celebrate.
I'm reading to observe the pattern.
And here's what I see:
Solutions building products without problems.
Last week: An AI tool that analyzes your face and predicts your blood report.
"Fast, non-invasive, revolutionary."
I stared at it and thought:
Why?
A blood report takes 30 minutes.
It's accurate. Accessible. Cheap.
The problem isn't getting the blood report.
So what problem are we solving?
This is the pattern everywhere:
Models chasing novelty.
Products chasing funding.
No one asking: Do we actually need this?

Here's what frustrates me:
There are complex problems everywhere.
Rare diseases with no diagnostic pathways.
Edge cases in oncology that kill patients because we have no pattern recognition at scale.
Healthcare workflows that collapse under cognitive load.
Real problems.
Unsolved problems.
Problems where AI could actually save lives.
But those problems are hard.
They're not sexy.
They don't get funding rounds.
So instead we get: face scans that predict blood work.

And here's what I'm doing about it:
I'm building tools.
Small ones. For problems I actually face.
Not for the market.
Not for scale.
For me.
Getting my hands dirty with the tools I need—
even if they're irrelevant to everyone else.
Because I'm learning the craft.
Understanding what works. What doesn't.
What problems are real versus what problems sound good in a pitch deck.
When I have market research that proves actual need—
when I see demand, not hype—
when I can build a team around a problem worth solving—
Then I'll go full throttle.
Not before.
I refuse to build solutions for problems that don't exist.
I refuse to chase funding for tools that chase trends.
I'll wait for the right problem.
Even if it takes years.

Meanwhile, I don't ask AI to celebrate my work.
I ask it to interrogate me.
My workflow is blunt:
I feed it my diagnosis logic, my hospital workflows, my OT protocols.
I instruct it:
"Assume I'm wrong.
Find the fallacy.
Expose the bias.
Audit me like an insurance company preparing for litigation."
AI is my adversarial collaborator.
A stress test.
A mirror with no politeness filter.
While others drown in AI-generated solutions,
I use the machine to keep my own thinking clean.

4. The Capex Mirage: Ferraris on Dirt Roads
Tech giants are burning $200B+ a year on AI infrastructure.
But the real-world utility is crawling.
Healthcare mirrors this absurdity.
We buy EMRs that are glorified billing machines.
We install AI dashboards no one opens.
We force nurses to chart on mobile screens because the hospital can't afford desktop systems.
We hire "innovation" that is not usable.
We buy software that is not clinician-friendly.
We invest in prestige, not workflow.
This is the part no hospital wants to admit:
Healthcare loves the idea of technology
more than the discipline of using technology.
A ₹5 crore robot remains idle.
Voice dictation tools expire without activation.
AI-ready systems collapse under the weight of broken data entry habits.
We are driving Ferraris on dirt roads
and wondering why the engine breaks.

5. The Education Collapse: Training Without Thinking
Everyone blames system overload.
No one blames the outdated pedagogy.
Students call medical classes boring.
Post-graduates are treated like labour.
No mentorship.
No reflection.
No frameworks.
No life lessons.
We complain residents don't think.
But we never taught them how to think.
We complain students lack curiosity.
But we kill curiosity the moment it appears.
AI cannot fix this.
Because the problem isn't the content of medicine.
It's the culture of medicine.

6. The Identity Trap: Refusing the Caricature
Society wants a surgeon who is always in the OT.
A technician.
A blade.
A function.
If I study AI, I'm "distracted."
If I read at night, I'm "not hardworking."
If I rest, I'm "lazy."
If I refuse a case, something must be "wrong."
I am expected to perform the role of a surgeon,
not live the life of a human.
But I don't owe anyone the performance of being a surgeon 24/7.
I owe myself a life that is fully lived.
My growth is not limited to a sterile OT.
My self-worth is not measured in case numbers.
My future is not confined to a single identity.
Let them assume what they want.
I'll choose the life I want.

7. The Question I Don't Answer Anymore
Someone asked me last month:
"Why are you learning AI? You're a surgical oncologist."
I used to feel the need to justify.
To explain.
To make my case.
Not anymore.
This is my life.
I don't owe anyone a performance of being only a surgeon.
I don't need permission to be curious.
I don't need approval to swim in a different direction.

But here's the tension I'm sitting with:
I'm also watching the investment world tear itself apart over AI.
Half the analysts say: Prepare for the boom. This is 1995 internet.
Half say: Prepare for the crash. This is 1999 internet.
Both sides present data so convincing
you could drown in either argument.
And I realize:
I don't know which current is real.
Maybe I'm swimming toward clarity.
Maybe I'm swimming toward irrelevance.
Maybe the river is rising and I'm the only one who'll survive.
Maybe I'm just exhausting myself while everyone else floats safely to shore.
I don't know yet.
What I do know:
Standing still feels like slow death.
Floating feels like surrender.
So I swim.
Not because I'm certain.
Because I can't not swim.

The Verdict: Human Logic Is the Asset
We should stop trying to make AI behave like doctors.
We should start training doctors who know how to direct AI.
The model knows survival curves.
The model knows meta-analyses.
The model knows probabilities.
But I know that a patient's daughter is getting married in 30 days.
And that changes consent.
It changes risk.
It changes treatment.
AI doesn't hold context.
AI doesn't hold grief.
AI doesn't hold responsibility.
We do.

The river keeps rising.
Some days I make it to the bank.
Some days I'm treading water, wondering if I've chosen the harder current for no reason.
But here's what I keep coming back to:
The real skill isn't avoiding the flood.
It's learning which currents to ride and which to resist.
I don't have this figured out.
I'm still swimming.
But I'd rather drown asking questions
than float safely toward a destination I never chose.

So here's my question for you:
What current are you floating in right now
that you haven't stopped to examine?
Not the AI hype.
Maybe it's something else entirely.
The question isn't about being contrarian.
It's about being awake.
I'm still learning which is which.
Are you?

I CARE ABOUT Myself

10/02/2026

17/01/2026

16/01/2026

23/12/2025

07/12/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Practice

Shortcuts

Share