19/02/2025
This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Medscape Pediatrics
COMMENTARY
Not All Children Respond to Vaccinations the Same
ID Consult
Michael E. Pichichero, MD
DISCLOSURES | February 07, 2025
6
46
Add to Email Alerts
Children do not respond equally to vaccines, nor do adults. Eight years ago, my group introduced the concept of low vaccine responder‒ and normal vaccine responder children. We tested 499 infants for antibody levels to multiple routine vaccines given in a 2-4-6 month series. Surprisingly, we found that 11% were what we termed “low responders” because the children developed subprotective antibody levels to at least four of six vaccine antigens (ingredients in diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines). We tested to seven other vaccines (polio serotypes 1, 2, 3, hepatitis B, and three pneumococcal conjugate vaccine components) and 50% developed subprotective antibody levels, which we termed “low responders.”
Michael E. Pichichero, MD
When we studied the immunity of the low responder infants, we found that they had problems with all three types of immunity cells: B cells that make antibody, T cells that help B cells and kill viruses, and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that take the vaccine ingredients to the lymph nodes and spleen, where the immune processing occurs. Taken together, the immunity profile of the infants suggested delayed immunologic maturation compared with normal vaccine responders, and we introduced the term “prolonged neonatal-like immune profile.” Since we had identified the immune problem in 11% of all the infants we studied, we realized that we had discovered the most common immune problem ever described, with the closest second being selective IgA deficiency, occurring in 1 in 600 children.
My group recently published another paper on the topic of variation in vaccine responsiveness in children. The specific focus of our newest paper was on examining how children’s vaccine response changes over time, from the primary vaccine responses in year 1 of life through the booster vaccinations in year 2. We sought to define four vaccine response groups based on antibody levels rather than two groups, to allow better resolution of the broad range of antibody measurements. The new study involved a secondary analysis of a subset of 357 of the 499 children included in our prior paper because we wanted to include only children who had a measurement of antibody at age 9 or 12 months and at least one measurement at another time through 36 months of age. We restricted our study to healthy, full-term-at-birth infants residing in urban, suburban, and rural areas of Rochester, New York, with broad representation in race and ethnicity, who had been prospectively enrolled and had clinical samples collected longitudinally during 2006-2017. Enrollment occurred at age 6 months after completion of a primary series of three vaccinations. Blood sampling at age 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 30-36 months was prespecified in the study protocol, although samples were often not provided at all age time points. Demographic factors that may affect vaccine responsiveness were prospectively collected by parent questionnaire. All children received age-appropriate vaccinations according to the recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control andPrevention, confirmed by review of the medical record.
To define vaccine response groups, we developed a novel method. We took the antibody levels to six vaccine antigens (DTaP and H. flu b PRP) and divided each by their threshold of protection, and the ratio was considered a “normalized” level. The geometric mean of the six normalized levels was calculated to derive an antibody response score. We then used a mathematical approach using the antibody score at age 9 or 12 months to divide the children into four groups: very low vaccine responder (vLVR; bottom 10th percentile of vaccine responders), LVR (bottom 10th-25th percentile), NVR (25th-75th percentile), and HVR (top 25th percentile). See Figure. Using this new method seemed to correlate well with the prior method, evidenced by the finding that 50% of vLVR children met the prior definition of subprotective responses to two thirds or more of the vaccines tested, and the percentage of children with 6/6 to 0/6 antibody levels below protection changed stepwise from the vLVR through HVR groups.
As expected, the level of antibody following vaccination changed over time for all the children, reflecting the response after completion of the primary vaccines and then antibody decay until boosters were given, resulting in an increase in antibody and then decay again. What was striking to us was that individual children tended to stay in their vaccine response group over time. So, if a child was a vLVR after the primary series, they tended to remain vLVR before and after their boosters, and similarly for the other classifications. When we assessed this observation by looking at antibody responses to the other seven vaccines we tested (polio serotypes 1, 2, 3; hepatitis B; and three pneumococcal conjugate vaccine components), the same phenomena occurred: A child who was a vLVR after the primary series tended to remain vLVR before and after their boosters, and similarly for the other classifications. When we assessed this observation by looking at antibody responses to all 13 vaccine antigens, the conclusion was the same. This meant that vaccine response and trajectory established in an individual child tended to remain the same throughout the booster series in the second year of life, which had never been reported before.
We looked at variables that might explain why children ended up in a vaccine response group. We collected data on demographic variables of s*x, ethnicity, race, siblings in the home, breastfeeding, smokers in the home, and daycare attendance. We found that African American/multiracial children were less frequently vLVR and LVR than White children, and we found that attendance at daycare (typically associated with more frequent infections and antibiotic exposure) occurred more often in vLVR and vLVR/LVR combined. We then looked at environmental variables and found that antibiotic treatmentoccurred significantly more often in vLVR children, confirming a recent earlier report from our group. Finally, we showed that low vaccine responsiveness was linked to more frequent antibiotic-treated bacterial infections.
The conclusions of our work were:
When vaccine-induced antibody levels are used to define vaccine response groups, individual children tend to persist in their initially established group but may change groups over time.
Changes in vaccine group are associated with demographic variables and are influenced by antibiotic exposures.
Lower vaccine responsiveness can be linked to more frequent antibiotic-treated bacterial infections.
6
Medscape Medical News
Blood Test Predicts How Long Vaccines Will Protect You
Pr Dominique Baudon
February 13, 2025
How long will vaccine protection last? A simple blood test may have the answer. Researchers at Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, have identified a molecular signature in the blood that appears days after vaccination and predicts the durability of the immune response. Published in Nature Immunology in January, this discovery could transform vaccine development, testing, and personalization of vaccines. The study also offers insights into why some vaccines provide lifelong immunity while others lose effectiveness within months.
Vaccine Durability
A major challenge in vaccinology is ensuring long-lasting, protective immunity. Vaccine protection varies depending on the vaccine and individual. Accurately determining the duration of immunity is essential for designing effective public health strategies. Scientists have long wondered why some vaccines enable the body to produce antibodies for decades or even a lifetime, whereas other vaccines offer protection for only a few months.
Live attenuated viral vaccines, such as smallpox and yellow fever vaccines, induce lifelong antibody responses. The measles-mumps-rubella vaccine also provides long-term protection, although boosters are recommended. In contrast, waning antibody responses have been observed with vaccines such as the inactivated seasonal influenza subunit vaccine and those against Bordetella pertussis, Salmonella typhi, and Neisseria meningitidis. The same holds true for malaria RTS,S and candidate HIV vaccines.
Adjuvants are vaccine components that enhance the strength and longevity of immune responses. For those aged > 70 years, insoluble aluminum salts (alum) have been the only adjuvants approved for human use. However, in the past three decades, several adjuvants have been introduced, including:
Oil-in-water emulsions (MF59 and AS03) used in influenza vaccines
TLR4 agonist adjuvants (eg, 3-O-desacyl-4’-monophosphoryl lipid A) used in vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus, herpes zoster, and human papillomavirus
Oligonucleotide adjuvants used in hepatitis B vaccines
Saponin-based adjuvants (eg, Matrix-M) in the recombinant COVID-19 vaccine and the R217 malaria vaccine.
Molecular Signature
Advances in immune system analysis now allow scientists to identify molecular signatures that predict the efficacy and duration of vaccine action. Previous studies on vaccines against yellow fever, seasonal influenza, and other diseases have shown that molecular markers in blood correlate with vaccine response.
A recent meta-analysis of over 3000 blood samples from 820 adults across 28 studies on 13 vaccines revealed a plasma cell signature that could predict antibody responses to many vaccines.
However, no study to date has identified a cellular or molecular signature capable of predicting the duration of an immune response.
Researchers at Stanford sought to identify the factors influencing both the magnitude and duration of vaccine-induced immunity. They discovered a molecular signature in the blood that appears a few days after vaccination and predicts the duration of the immune response. According to the authors, this provides “important insights into the mechanisms by which vaccines induce durable immunity.”
Predicting Response Longevity
The researchers conducted a systems vaccinology analysis to investigate immune responses in humans to the H5N1 influenza vaccine, with and without the AS03 adjuvant. Fifty healthy individuals were randomly assigned to receive two doses of the avian influenza vaccine with or without an adjuvant.
Blood samples taken within 100 days of vaccination revealed a molecular signature linked to long-lasting antibody responses. This signature consists of RNA fragments from bone marrow megakaryocytes that are carried into the bloodstream by platelets.
The link between this molecular signature and megakaryocytes was first demonstrated in mice vaccinated with the avian influenza vaccine. Activation of megakaryocytes by thrombopoietin enhanced the durability of vaccine-induced antibody responses. This activation also promoted the survival of human bone marrow plasma cells through β1/β2 integrin-mediated cell interactions, leading to the production of molecules that increase plasma cell survival.
Building on this, a machine-learning model based on this platelet-associated signature was developed to predict the longevity of vaccine-induced immunity. Researchers analyzed antibody response data from 244 participants who had received seven different vaccines, including seasonal influenza, yellow fever, malaria, and COVID-19. Across these vaccines, the same platelet RNA molecules, indicating megakaryocyte activation, were consistently associated with more durable antibody production.
The ultimate goal is to develop a simple blood test based on platelet-associated markers to estimate vaccine durability using this molecular signature. Researchers also aim to validate these tests across different vaccines and populations globally. This could accelerate vaccine clinical trials and lead to the development of personalized vaccination strategies.
This story was translated from JIM using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Comments
FIND US ON
ABOUT
About Medscape
Privacy Policy
Editorial Policy
Cookies
Terms of Use
Advertising Policy
Help Center
MEMBERSHIP
Become a Member
About You
Professional Information
Newsletters & Alerts
Market Research
APP
Medscape
EDITIONS
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Português
UK
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.