29/06/2021
Should We Train To Failure?🕵🏽♂️⠀
⠀
👉🏼 Like any other tool in our hypertrophy toolbox, there’s a time a place to train to failure. ⠀
⠀
👉🏼 Taking every set to failure will only reduce the overall training volume you’re capable of performing on that given exercise. As each set is taken to failure, the number of reps you perform in your subsequent set will almost always be less. Taking every set to failure can also drastically impede acute performance, potentially up to 48 hours (Moran-Navarro et al., 2017).⠀
⠀
👉🏼 In comparison, if each set is performed while leaving one to two repetitions in reserve, you are likely to achieve more overall work volume.⠀
⠀
‼ BUT - that’s not to say that there is no use in taking sets to failure. Some muscle fibers may have a higher threshold, and to fully activate their full spectrum of motor units, sets may be required to be taken to failure, or at least as close as possible. ⠀
⠀
👉🏼 An appropriate application could be towards the end of a mesocycle via isolation exercises. The following deload week will allow the athlete to recover from the accumulated fatigue.⠀
⠀
👉🏼 When comparing training to failure and leaving some reps in reserve, there appears to be little to no significance in additional strength or hypertrophy (Davies et al., 2016). ⠀
⠀
👉🏼 However, training to failure does seem to be more challenging to recover from, affecting upcoming training days. In the practical world, it’s more beneficial to match training volume, even if it means adding more sets, leaving each set a few reps shy of failure in each set.⠀
⠀