What are the opening hours?

Monday 9am - 7pm Tuesday 9am - 7pm Wednesday 9am - 7pm Thursday 9am - 7pm Friday 9am - 6pm Saturday 9am - 6pm

http://www.cancernaturopath.com.au/

The Cancer Naturopath, Brisbane (2026)

19/02/2026

The rates of cancer diagnosis have hugely increased in the last 5 years, due to one major reason.

What do you think that reason is?

In the last couple of years I’ve seen so many new and sudden cancers, recurrent cancers, aggressive cancers, younger people with cancers, turbo cancers, or initial cancer diagnosis at stage 4 and/or with metastasis (spread to other organs) already, which are more usually seen in more advanced cancers.

Q: So what has changed?

A: The number of people who got the COVID “treatment” since 2021, and the number of them that people got, or were mandated to get. And many studies confirm this.

An Italian study followed 300,000 people for 30 months from 2021 and compared those people who didn’t take the COVID injections with those who did, for cancer admissions, as well as for other chronic health issues. For most types of cancers, the study found that those with even just one of the COVID injections had 200% the incidences of cancer compared to those who didn’t get the injection (Acuti Martellucci et. al., 2025). For people who had 3 or more of the COVID injections, there were up to 250-300% increases in the incidences of cancer, and even 500% more for prostate cancer, compared to those who didn’t get the injections. The study found similar increases in other chronic issues in those who took the injections, for incidences of high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic lung disease and kidney disease too.

A study from Korea which followed 8 million people for 12 months, again looking at the rates of various cancers in those who didn’t take the COVID injections vs those who did (Kim et. al., 2025). This research confirmed the findings of the Italian study, that many cancer rates had significantly increased in 12 months after having a COVID injection, especially for cancers of the thyroid, stomach, colon and re**um, lung, breast and prostate.

These are not the only studies to find such large increases in cancers in people who took the COVID injections.

There are a number of ways that the COVID injections can cause increased rates of cancer (Valdes Angues & Perea Bustos, 2023, Seneff et. al, 2022), including:

1. Causing high and chronic inflammation from the lipid nanoparticles in the mRNA injections or from the spike proteins, which affects many body functions and reduces immune system function
2. Causing oxidative damage to different organs and cells, including the heart, thyroid, liver, kidneys, reproductive organs and brain, potentially leading to cancer in these organs
3. The spike proteins target the ACE-2 receptors on the cell walls of major organs and tissues, to get into cells and cause damage
4. Causing oxidative damage to your white blood cells – your immune system cells, to reduce their number, and distract them from their normal function of finding and killing cancer cells
5. Specifically causing lymphopenia (low numbers of lymphocytes, the type of immune system white blood cells which are your anti-cancer immune cells)
6. Inhibiting the normal cancer-suppressing genes that we have, including p53, BRCA and others which can prevent cancers, or keep cancer in check
7. Promoting activation of cancer cells through a number of different genetic mechanisms
8. DNA contamination in the injections, including the SV-40 cancer-promoting proteins
9. The COVID injections being shown in studies to change cellular DNA via reverse transcription, which damages DNA or causes mutations, which can lead to cancer development
10. Impairing other immune system functions, including interferon signalling, which can reduce normal cancer surveillance functions of the immune system
11. The constant and high production of the spike proteins from the injections isn’t able to be stopped or cleared naturally by the body, so studies have shown that people are still producing the spike proteins 3.5 years after their last injection. And the damage is higher with each injection you get.

In people with cancer and who had the COVID injections, any one of these factors can lead to cancer, but the big problem is that all of these factors together is devastating to your body, your health and your immune system function.

This is also why people who had previously had cancer or their cancer was in remission, their cancer returned or suddenly got aggressive and accelerated again. One study found up to 98% of cancers being reported as a side effect of all v@ccines which were reported to the US’s VAERS database (of v@ccine side effects) were from the COVID injections in just 2021 alone (Seneff et. al., 2022). In some cases of cancers reported in the VAERS database, 100% were from the COVID injections – bladder cancer, pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer.

What can you do to either reduce your risks of cancer occurring, recurring, or to help treat an existing cancer which may be in part the result of the COVID injections?

All the root causes of cancer in each person need to be identified and treated or removed, and this includes the damage that the COVID injections are doing. The root causes and factors will be different in each person. Luckily there are things which can help with this! And this is what I can do to help!

See my website here for more info or bookings – www.cancernaturopath.com.au

Stay healthy!

References:

Acuti Martellucci, C., Capodici, A., Soldato, G., Fiore, M., Zauli, E., Carota, R., De Benedictis, M., Di Marco, G., Di Luzio, R., Flacco, M. E., & Manzoli, L. (2025). COVID-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for cancer: 30-month cohort study in an Italian province. EXCLI journal, 24, 690–707. DOI: 10.17179/excli2025-8400

Kim, H. J., Kim, M. H., Choi, M. G., & Chun, E. M. (2025). 1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea. Biomarker research, 13(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w

Seneff, S., Nigh, G., Kyriakopoulos, A. M., & McCullough, P. A. (2022). Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 164, 113008. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008

Valdes Angues, R., & Perea Bustos, Y. (2023). SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Cureus, 15(12), e50703. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50703

06/02/2026

A very recent study was published in the Nature journal on the causes of cancer, especially the “modifiable” causes of cancer, being those you have control over or can change. This new study (Fink et al, 2026) suggests that while cancers are a leading cause of mortality and burden on personal and national health budgets, there are 30 modifiable factors which can greatly prevent or reduce the risks of cancer. As such, up to 30% of cancers in women, and over 57% of cancers in men are preventable!

Some of the modifiable factors to prevent cancer include smoking, alcohol intake, having a high body mass index (ie, being overweight), low physical activity, UV radiation, infections, exposure to various toxicities, and more.

But the study didn’t even look at foods or diets that people eat, of nutrient deficiencies or excesses as modifiable risk factors! So the cancer prevention rates are actually very much higher than stated above!

One study in the past, entitled “Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes” (Anand et. al, 2008) looked at the cancer prevention rates in a different way, such as the percentage of cancers which may have a genetic cause compared to non-genetic or environmental and lifestyle (ie, modifiable) causes. This study showed that the largest modifiable factors for cancer development were your diet (30-35%), smoking (25-30%), infections (15-20%), and obesity (10-20%), but genetics only contributes a 5-10% risk to cancer development. Therefore 90-95% of cancers are driven by your modifiable choices! Hence in reality, 90-95% of cancers are preventable!

This information is important for prevention of cancers, but also in the treatment of cancers too!

When has a doctor or oncologist ever mentioned how you can reduce your risks of cancer, or improve your chances of recovery from cancer, by recommending dietary and lifestyle improvements which make up 95% of the causes (and treatments!) for cancer?! You can have all the surgeries, chemotherapy and radiation treatments that doctors recommend, but if you don’t make environmental changes to your diet and lifestyle, you can pretty much guarantee that the cancer will come back. Nobody wants that.

I have detailed consultations with cancer patients, especially in the initial consultation, to ask a lot of questions to find all the root causes and factors for the cancer development and progression in each person. Then I recommend specific and personalised dietary, lifestyle, and other treatment recommendations. This gives the best possible outcomes for your cancer treatment.

See my website (www.cancernaturopath.com.au) for more information and bookings.

Stay healthy!

References:

Anand, P,. Kunnumakkara, A,B., Sundaram, C., Harikumar, K.B., Tharakan, S.T., Lai, O.S., Sung, B., Aggarwal, B.B. (2008). Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharmaceutical Research, 25 (9). DOI: 10.1007/s11095-008-9661-9.

Fink, H., Langselius, O., Vignat, J. Rumgay, H., Rehm, J., Martinez, R.X., Santero, M., Lopez-Perez, L., Inoue, M., Zeng, H., Shield, K., Morgan, E., Ilbawi. A., & Soerjomataram, I. (2026). Global and regional cancer burden attributable to modifiable risk factors to inform prevention. Nature Medicine. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-026-04219-7

04/02/2026

Today (February 4th) is World Cancer Day, to raise awareness of many different types of cancers, which affects most of us in some way directly or indirectly, and is the cause of death of one in two men and one in three women. These are incredible statistics, but not in a good way.

If you know me or have read some of my articles here, you may know that the topic of cancer comes up a lot, because it has been my main area of interest in natural health treatments for many years.

I was initially drawn to natural cancer treatments because the general public believe that this is the biggest and baddest of health problems (yes, even more than covid!), because a diagnosis of "cancer" fills people with such dread and fear, that it reminds people that we really are mortal. We shouldn't fear cancer at all, but welcome it as it is your body giving you warnings and telling you that it is not liking what you are doing to it. It may take some time to change this perception of cancer, but we can start now.

My fears of cancer disappeared when I started reading cancer research over 15 years ago, when I found that your body's white blood cells, in particular the Cytotoxic CD4+ T-cells and NK (Natural Killer) cells, have a primary task every day in our bodies to find and destroy virus-infected AND cancer cells! Hence it is your own immune systems that CAN and DOES fight cancer every day!

I have linked a short video showing this - your immune system cells attacking cancer cells and destroying them! Watch this video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntk8XsxVDi0

This information and this video highlights the importance of your immune system for the prevention and treatment of cancer! Just as a strong and healthy immune system is needed for the prevention of infections, such as the current coronavirus circus, your immune system can prevent and fight cancer too!

Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery are NOT the only options for cancer treatment! These actually don't help you much at all, because both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ie, chemical therapy and radiation therapy, respectively) actually CAUSE more cancer by poisoning the body and destroying the immune system - the main part of your body's defence against cancer! It just doesn't make sense to do this. The medical system also does not offer any advice for prevention of cancer, which I believe is much more important!

I still read a lot of cancer research, and I put this knowledge into practice with my clients. There is no one cure for cancer (and never will be using the medical system model) as treatment requires a personalised and holistic (whole body) approach using a combination of correct nutrition and avoiding some specific foods, supplementation, stress relief and management, detoxification, mindset, lifestyle, exercise and other treatments. Each person's causes for their cancer will be different to the next person, hence why any cancer treatment MUST be a personalised one based on finding all the root causes of each person's cancer - which is not done in the medical system.

If your immune system is not strong, or you get frequent infections or illnesses, or if there is a family history of cancer or autoimmune conditions, preventative investigations can be done to reduce your risks. This is where I can help - this is what I do!

19/01/2026

In this month of January, being Cervical Cancer Awareness Month, one of the recommended “treatments” for prevention of cervical cancer is the HPV v@ccine, which includes the Gardasil v@ccine. But is this alleged treatment or prevention actually beneficial in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer, or worth being forced on millions of teenagers every year, and what are the risks and dangers of this?

I’ve spent a LONG time researching the Gardasil v@ccines and cervical cancer, and I have published a detailed and fully referenced article in the attached link on my website. You can also download the PDF document of the article to save and share.

In short, I found from research and in clinical practice, the following:
1. The rates of cervical cancer were reducing for many years before the Gardasil v@ccine was first introduced in 2007
2. Rates of cervical cancer started increasing every year since Gardasil was introduced
3. Rates of cervical cancer increased by over 90% in some age groups after the Gardasil vaccine was introduced
4. There are over 100 HPV viruses which can allegedly cause ge***al warts or cervical cancer, but the Gardasil vaccine only contains antigens for 4 or 9 of them, so the potential coverage for prevention is pretty low
5. One of the main causes of serious side effects and chronic health issues after the Gardasil v@ccine is due to it containing aluminium as an adjuvant, to stimulate the immune system response
6. Aluminium is a neurotoxic heavy metal, and can damage your brain, nerves and nervous system function. The newer Gardasil 9 v@ccine (with 9 HPV antigens) has twice as much aluminium than the original Gardasil 4, making it potentially twice as dangerous
7. Aluminium particularly damages the autonomic nerves, which controls your heart and circulation, breathing, digestive system, and more. This is why so many people who have this v@ccine have side effects and symptoms of digestive issues such as constipation and nausea, and/or heart issues such as dizziness, fainting, light-headedness, tachycardia (racing heart), blood pressure issues, and more issues
8. The heart and circulation side effects of the Gardasil v@ccine can be diagnosed as some of the Dysautonomia conditions such as POTS (Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome), Orthostatic Hypotension, Orthostatic Hypertension, or others.

There are many more issues with the Gardasil v@ccine and what you are being told (and not told) about cervical cancer. See my full article in detail in the comments.

If you have had the Gardasil v@ccine and had long-term health problems since, I have successfully reversed its side effects, including the Dysautonomia/POTS symptoms and other symptoms, and the high aluminium levels too.

All parents of children and teenagers should read the linked article and be aware of the possible risks and potential chronic health issues from this unnecessary v@ccine. Unnecessary as I have explained in previous articles, that the HPV virus isn’t the only cause for cervical cancer, and to consider avoiding this one.

Stay healthy!

13/01/2026

January is cervical cancer awareness month, to raise awareness and funding for cervical cancer charities and research (WHO, 2024).
There have been a number of major changes to screening for cervical cancer in recent years which will make you wonder why they were made as they actually increase the risks of cervical cancer, and will make you wonder why anyone would give any donations or support to so-called cancer charities.

The issues I have with the various changes to cervical cancer are listed below:

Change to Pap smears being replaced with CST testing:

In 2017, the Qld Cancer Council announced that the National Cervical Screening Program of pap smears for women every 2 years was replaced by the new Cervical Screening Test (CST) (Cancer Council, 2017). In recent times since 2022, women can still get the CST test done via their GP or also now from a home testing kit. This article will explain why the CST test isn’t as good as the pap smear tests, and why the home test kit is next to useless and can actually be very dangerous for women.

The previous pap smear tests checked for abnormal cervical cells by a trained pathologist. But the CST will only check for the HPV (Human Papilloma Virus), which is just one alleged cause of cervical cancer. The HPV testing in the CST is only done via computer. And the CST will only be required every 5 years instead of 2 years for the pap smear test.

The CST will still require the same uncomfortable procedure to obtain cervical cells as the pap smear, just less frequently. Only if the HPV virus is found will someone actually visually check your pap smear for abnormal cells.

The issues here are several:
- The CST test is only looking for ONE possible causative factor of cervical cancer, being the HPV
- The CST ignores all other possible causes of cervical cancer, so if you don’t have HPV, the cervical cancer will not get picked up until it becomes much more developed and serious and presents with serious symptoms.

Increased duration for recommended testing:

The less frequent testing (being a money saving measure, in my opinion), from every 2 years for a pap smear to 5 years now, is a major concern that will increase the risks of increased development and progression of cervical cancer.

I’ve had female patients who have gone from a negative test to CIN 2 or 3 cervical cancer within the 2-year repeated tests. But now it’s a 5 year duration in retesting...

If you are female and have a family history of female hormone or s*x organ related cancers, or who have had cervical cancer in the past, you can and should retest much more regularly than 5 years apart. Even if there is no family history of cervical cancer but for ongoing health and prevention, you can and should test more frequently than these organisations say.

Home testing for cervical cancer:

Since 2022 the at-home testing kits for cervical cancer have been available (Cancer Council, 2024), but as you can see from the infographic of this article, the swab doesn’t even get close to the cervix for obtaining any worthwhile cervical cells (or cancer cells) to actually test. It’s just a vaginal test and not a cervical cancer test. It’s next to useless. Or worse, it can be very dangerous (and even deadly) if a woman actually has unknown cervical cancer, and tests her vaginal cells instead of the cervix, and the cancer remains unknown after the at-home test kit. Then because of the cost-cutting measures of the Cancer Council and government health budgets, the woman waits another 5 years to test again – so the cervical cancer can develop and progress much further and become far more serious, or deadly.

Women should continue to see their GP or Gynaecologist for a proper and accurately taken cervical swab, as well as other testing I suggest here.

No other testing recommended for cervical cancer:

Having the HPV virus and testing positive for this in the CST test, isn’t the only cause or factor for the development and progression of cervical cancer.

Research suggests that an HPV infection alone is NOT sufficient to cause cervical cancer! (Spurgeon et. Al., 2017). Cervical cancer, and other reproductive cancers in women, are related to female hormones and often an imbalance between the hormones oestrogen and progesterone. The same research also suggests that an immune system dysfunction and chronic inflammation are also equal causative factors in the development and progression of cervical cancer. This study says these other factors are mandatory for the development of cervical cancer. So pap smears or the new CST are simply not good enough screening tests for this type of cancer.

As a better preventative for cervical cancer, or other female cancers, or in fact ANY cancer, you can (and SHOULD) get your immune system function checked, inflammation levels tested, and female hormone levels tested regularly for a much better picture for the prevention of ALL female reproductive cancers, and for your overall health.

Summary:

I believe all of these changes to cervical cancer screening will in fact put more women at risk of cervical cancer, and developing more severe cancer due to less frequent testing, and will likely kill far more women as a result. More regular, more accurate, and more holistic testing is needed for the prevention of cervical cancer.

More women need to be informed of these changes to cervical cancer screening and the likely increased risks to cervical cancer. The more women are aware of these issues, and that additional testing is needed too, the less cervical cancer we may see due to prevention, or at least to catch it earlier. Please share to your female friends and groups to let them know!

Stay healthy!

References:

Cancer Council. (2024). Self collection and the cervical screening test. Retrieved 12th November 2024 from https://www.cancer.org.au/cervicalscreening/i-am-over-25/do-i-need-the-test/self-collection-and-the-cervical-screening-test

Spurgeon, M.E, den Boon , J.A., Mark Horswill, M., Barthakur, S., Forouzan, O., Rader, J.S., Beebe, D.J., Roopra, A., Ahlquist, P., & Lambert, P.F. (2017). Human papillomavirus oncogenes reprogram the cervical cancer microenvironment independently of and synergistically with estrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114 (43):E9076-E9085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712018114.

WHO. (2024). Retrieved 13th January 2026 from https://www.emro.who.int/noncommunicable-diseases/campaigns/cervical-cancer-awareness-month-2024.html

22/10/2025

Following on from yesterday’s article on pink ribbon day for breast cancer, and the ridiculousness of the pinkwashing of unhealthy products being used to raise funds for cancer charities, here’s another article on breast cancer, which also relates to other cancers too.

The medical system only treats the symptoms of cancer, being the tumour itself. They “treat” cancer by removing it with surgery, poisoning it (and the whole body) with chemotherapy, or nuking it with radiation. Doctors and oncologists never look at finding what the causes of the cancer are in each person.

Why are the causes of breast cancer important?

Because if the root causes of breast cancer, or any cancer for that matter, are not found in each person, and then treated, avoided, or removed, then almost guaranteed that the cancer won't go away, or it will return again shortly after the treatment.

But I hear people ask – but we don’t know what causes cancer! Yes we do!

The media, doctors, and cancer charities often say they don’t know what the cause of cancer is, and hence why cancer charities want your money for research to find the cause of cancer. The most important word there is “THE” cause of cancer. Singular. They are trying to find ONE cause of cancer or ONE treatment for cancer, but there is no one cause of cancer and never will be one treatment for cancer.

The World Health Organisation has 534 causes of cancer on their website! I know some more from published studies which are not on their list.

The causes of cancer in each person, from my experience, are always a combination of root causes and factors, and which can be different to other people, even with the same type of cancer. Hence the importance of finding all the root causes of cancer in each person.

This is what I do that's different - with detailed questioning and investigations into blood test results in a more holistic way, I find all the root causes of cancer in each person. Then I recommend a personalised treatment plan to address all the root causes and other factors which contribute to cancers in each person, such as anaemia, low thyroid function, low liver function, low immune function, inflammation, and more.

This is the only way to really treat and reverse cancers. This can be done in conjunction with medical treatments, or not, as is your choice.

For more information on how I can help, please see my website for more details - www.cancernturopath.com.au

20/10/2025

Some companies and cancer charities will never learn... October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, October 13th is Breast Cancer Awareness Day, and October 21st (today) is Pink Ribbon Day (for breast and gynaecological cancers), to raise awareness of these diagnoses, and to raise funds for cancer charities for "research".

In reality, these awareness days are a means for these cancer charities to raise funds to keep the organisation in existence and to pay for the bosses and staff, rent, and their expensive marketing. Very, very little actually goes into research or any benefit to those who have cancer. I previously wrote an article on this topic and I investigated the financial reports of the major cancer charity organisation in Australia and I found they only spent 0.9% of its over $30 million dollars in donations, actually went into research. Less than 1%!

A national bakery chain, whose name will remain anonymous here, pledges 100% of sales from their pink buns from their event in May to go to the Breast Cancer Network Australia. Many people will think this is a good cause and want to help reduce incidences of breast cancer, or to help those who have the condition.

But the BCNA and other cancer organisations are fundraising by using unhealthy products which ironically cause and contribute to the very condition that they are trying to prevent! Sugar in excess can be one of many causes of cancer, and sugar as glucose is the main source of fuel for energy and growth of cancer cells! Sugar also reduces immune system function, causes inflammation and oxidative damage to the body, all of which can hugely increase the risk of cancer development and progression. Hence for cancer prevention and treatment, reducing and avoiding sugary foods and drinks is essential. Most of the products or foods promoted in cancer fundraising efforts for cancer organisations or charities are full of sugar, chemicals, or high carbohydrate grain-based foods which break down into sugar in the body.

This practice of "pinkwashing" of promoting very unhealthy products for cancer research is insane and ironic, but unfortunately very common - see some of the article pictures for ridiculous examples of pinkwashing of very unhealthy foods, all for the benefit of raising funds for the cancer organisations.

Support cancer charities in other ways if you must, but please don't buy these "pinkwashed" products that can put you or someone at risk of cancer, or make their health worse. Or perhaps better, donate to your own health program, to prevent or reduce your risks of cancer. Until such time as the cancer charities actually put a significant amount of their donations into real cancer research and real cancer treatments, including the many natural and safe options, I will not be donating a cent to these cancer charity organisations.

Stay healthy!

07/09/2025

A very recent peer-reviewed study published on 6th September 2025 (Speicher, Rose, & McKernan, 2025) has confirmed other similar studies of high levels of contamination in the mandated mRNA COVID v-injections (you know what I’m referring to!) (Hulscher, 2025). The study refers to the contamination as “impurities” as they are known and predictable substances from the manufacturing process, compared to contamination being from external environmental factors.

This study only looked at the DNA contamination of the v-injections and not other contaminations which have been identified in other studies. DNA impurities were found in every vial and batch tested, and the amount of DNA contamination was extremely concerning.

One of the things which should typically be seen in pharmaceutical medications and injections is exactly the same amount of the ingredients in each dose and in each product in every batch. Otherwise, it could be dangerous if a dose of a product was in excess of what is prescribed or approved, or not of any benefit if the dose was too low. Medications and even supplements are approved by regulatory authorities, such as our TGA, on the basis of a standard amount of the ingredients. If there is any deviation from the approved ingredients and amounts, the products are typically recalled and investigated.

The regulators allow a tiny amount of DNA in v-injections, such as 10 nanograms (10 billionths of a gram), but these mRNA v-injections contain up to 62,700% HIGHER levels of DNA contamination than is allowed. In the Pfizer products, there was up to 15,300% higher levels of DNA contamination, or 62,700% higher for the Moderna products.
This level of contamination alone should be enough for the regulators in each country to recall and ban these products. But what is worse is that DNA contamination in v-injections can increase the risks of cancer development and progression in people who had these v-injections. This is because your body is not meant to be exposed to foreign DNA, especially via injections. Non-human DNA in the body in this way can integrate with your DNA and cause autoimmune issues and cancers.

Even worse is that one of the types of DNA contamination is called SV40 which was only found in the Pfizer v-injections. The SV40 DNA sequences were only added to the Pfizer products AFTER their initial approval from the regulators, after they changed their production process. So the product that was approved was not what the public received, and again the product should have been recalled on this change. SV40 is the Simian Virus 40, a known cancer-causing DNA virus from monkeys which induces brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma (a lung cancer), lymphomas, and likely other cancers too (Vilchez & Butel, 2004).

SV40 can cause cancer in a number of different ways, by weakening the immune system response, by inhibiting several of our “tumour suppressing genes” such as p53, which can then promote cancer development, and also by directly inducing cancerous changes in cells. Now you know why there’s been a massive increase in the number of cases of cancers in the last 4 years, since so many people had these v-injections.

Other concerns with these mRNA v-injections found in this study is that different batches of the v-injections appear to have different amounts or levels of the ingredients, and hence why some batches cause extremely high numbers of serious adverse events, and even deaths, which were reported to the regulators, ranging from 17% of reported adverse events per batch and even up to 86% or 95% of some batches were causing reported side effects. These reported adverse events don’t include cancers as this side effect doesn’t appear until later.

If you, or anyone you know, has had cancer in the last 4 years since getting these v-injections, part of the treatment plan MUST include a treatment to reduce and remove the chronic inflammation, oxidative damage, immune system damage, and genetic damage that these mRNA v-injections are continually causing to promote the cancer development. This can be done and will put the brakes on further cancer development, and even start to reverse it.

These v-injections must be stopped because of the damage they are causing to people and families. The regulators around the world, including our TGA in Australia, perhaps need to be aware of these issues so they can investigate further. The science is already there to show the issues with these v-injections, but we likely need public pressure to force them to act on this. The TGA’s website for reporting issues with v-injections can be found here - https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resource/forms/report-medicine-or-vaccine-defect

Use the above information here and published study references at the end of the article if needed, to get them to investigate these issues further.

Stay healthy!

References:

Hulscher, N. (2025). BREAKING: Updated Pfizer & Moderna mRNA Shots Contaminated With DNA Up to 627× Above Safety Limits. Retrieved 7th September, 2025 from https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-updated-pfizer-and-moderna

Speicher, D. J., Rose, J., & McKernan, K. (2025). Quantification of residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada. Autoimmunity, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517

Vilchez, R. A., & Butel, J. S. (2004). Emergent human pathogen simian virus 40 and its role in cancer. Clinical microbiology reviews, 17(3), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.3.495-508.2004

The Cancer Naturopath

19/02/2026

06/02/2026

04/02/2026

19/01/2026

13/01/2026

22/10/2025

20/10/2025

07/09/2025

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Monday	9am - 7pm
Tuesday	9am - 7pm
Wednesday	9am - 7pm
Thursday	9am - 7pm
Friday	9am - 6pm
Saturday	9am - 6pm