09/04/2026
The advent of "AI Partners" has highlighted a problem I see more and more in couples' therapy. If it is doing its job, the user becomes more attached, spends more time in artificial spaces with the AI and less and less in the literal/real/phsyical world.
Recently, I've noticed a more pronounced resistance in couples' to do things that require them to be uncomfortable, to push back against dynamics that don't have the outcome of ensuring personal (not mutual) happiness. If my partner is hurt or broken or has a need that requires me to give to the point of discomfort - - the conclusion often seems to be, "We aren't a good fit." If my partner says or does something that causes me pain, it must mean he/she doesn't love me and we shouldn't be together. If we disagree politically...we aren't a good fit
I think this mentality is exascerbated by a culture in which we have more "artificial" connections than real ones. From Kindergarten to retirement, we can now and are encouraged to curate lives of comfort. Like a body that never does any weight bearing exercise, is never given the opportunity or requirement of walking, carrying its own weight or breaking a sweat - I think this leads to a lack of maturation (emotional immaturity), relational lethargy and frankly - sickly/fragile lives.
Resiliance and strength both emotionally and physically are built through discomfort. The ability to sit in discomfort, hold it and move through it is what ultimately leads to satisfying, healthy and long-lasting relationships. Individuals who have never been required to hold and move through discomfort are extremely unhappy and lean toward selfishness. Selfishness cannot coexist with connectedness. And what most people are longing for is connection. If you want connection, you have to learn to be uncomfortable and still be okay.