03/07/2024
ABA: Denying Joy To Children
I've written about this before, but it keeps happening. I've heard this story too many times to count. This is still part of the "new" ABA, because there is no "new" ABA. The core principles, the education, and these tactics remain the same.
Here's the scenario: An ABA practitioner is working with a child. They find something the child really likes, and they decide to use it as a "reinforcer". Then, they instruct parents and other professionals to NOT give that item to the child because it's being used in "therapy" as a reinforcer.
They like pretzels? Don't give them pretzels.
They like bubbles, do NOT give them bubbles.
They can "work" for them.
What?
This is NOT OK!
This is not science, it's not best practice and it's void of humanity.
Why do we have to deny joy to a child because they have an autism diagnosis?
Why are adults withholding favorite things from young, neurodivergent children to get them to do what they want? For the data? To show progress? At what cost, though? Are the data points worth denying joy to a young child? Are the hours of 'therapy' worth taking away body autonomy and teaching kids to mask, just so they can get that desired toy? I can't even begin to imagine how exhausting and demoralizing that is for a child.
If your ABA practitioner tells you to eliminate a favorite item because they are using it for a reinforcer, it's OK to tell them NO. It's fine to express your discomfort with the strategy.
An autism diagnosis doesn't mean we have to deny joy to child in order to get them to work.
We must do better.
If your child likes bubbles, here's some really practical advice: Give them bubbles and watch the joy in their face as they play!
Please share your stories in the comments. Friendly reminder, ABA will not be defended on this page. I'll squash the foreseeable paycheck analogy in the comment section with an infographic.