Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre

Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre This page is about chiropractic research and clinic related information. Andrew Lyell has been practising in Kings Langley for over 25 years.

He is a member of the Australian Chiropractors Association and Sports Chiropractic Australia.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=775882475551625&set=a.123816967424849
31/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=775882475551625&set=a.123816967424849

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome – A Biomechanical Perspective

Shoulder impingement syndrome is fundamentally a problem of altered biomechanics rather than isolated tissue damage. The shoulder complex relies on precise coordination between the glenohumeral joint, scapulothoracic motion, acromioclavicular joint, and sternoclavicular joint. When this coordination is disrupted, the subacromial space narrows and compressive forces rise, leading to irritation of the rotator cuff tendons and subacromial bursa.

At the glenohumeral joint, normal arm elevation requires the humeral head to remain centered within the glenoid fossa. This centering is achieved by the rotator cuff producing a compressive and inferiorly directed force that counteracts the upward pull of the deltoid. When the rotator cuff—particularly the supraspinatus and infraspinatus—becomes weak or fatigued, the humeral head migrates superiorly during elevation, increasing mechanical contact with the undersurface of the acromion.

The subacromial space is biomechanically narrow even under ideal conditions. During shoulder abduction between approximately 60° and 120°, the space is naturally reduced as the greater tuberosity approaches the acromion. If superior humeral translation occurs, this reduction becomes excessive, resulting in compression of the supraspinatus tendon, long head of the biceps tendon, and subacromial bursa. This explains the classic painful arc seen during mid-range elevation.

Scapular biomechanics play a decisive role in either protecting or provoking impingement. Normal shoulder elevation follows a scapulohumeral rhythm, where glenohumeral motion is coupled with upward rotation, posterior tilt, and external rotation of the scapula. Reduced scapular upward rotation or posterior tilt decreases clearance beneath the acromion, mechanically predisposing the shoulder to impingement even in the absence of structural abnormalities.

The acromioclavicular joint contributes to impingement biomechanics by influencing scapular motion and acromial orientation. Degenerative changes, osteophyte formation, or altered clavicular motion can shift the acromion inferiorly. This structural change further reduces subacromial space, increasing compressive load on soft tissues during arm elevation and overhead activities.

Muscle imbalance is a major driver of faulty mechanics. Overactivity of the upper trapezius combined with weakness of the lower trapezius and serratus anterior alters scapular force couples. Instead of smooth upward rotation and posterior tilt, the scapula elevates excessively, maintaining a downward-facing acromion. This dysfunctional pattern magnifies impingement forces with repetitive use.

From a load perspective, repetitive overhead activities expose the rotator cuff to cyclical compressive and tensile stress. Each elevation cycle subjects the tendons to friction and compression under the acromion. Over time, this leads to tendon degeneration rather than acute inflammation, explaining why impingement often becomes chronic and resistant to rest alone.

In functional tasks such as lifting, throwing, or reaching overhead, energy should flow efficiently from the trunk and scapula to the arm. When proximal control is lost, the shoulder compensates by increasing local muscular demand, amplifying joint compression. This inefficient force transfer accelerates tissue overload and symptom progression.

Shoulder impingement is not simply a space problem—it is a movement and load-management problem. Restoring humeral head control, optimizing scapular mechanics, and rebalancing force couples are essential to reducing subacromial compression and achieving long-term resolution rather than temporary symptom relief.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BHGBnJhzk/
19/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BHGBnJhzk/

A medication trusted by millions for nerve pain is now raising serious questions about long-term brain health.

A large new study examining medical records from more than 26,000 patients has found a strong association between prolonged gabapentin use and increased risk of cognitive decline. Patients who received six or more prescriptions were 29% more likely to be diagnosed with dementia and 85% more likely to develop mild cognitive impairment (MCI) within ten years compared to non-users.

What’s especially concerning is who appears most vulnerable. Adults aged 35 to 49 showed an even higher relative risk, challenging the assumption that dementia-related threats are limited to older populations. Researchers are now urging clinicians to closely monitor memory, attention, and overall cognitive function in patients prescribed gabapentin for extended periods.

Gabapentin—commonly sold under brand names like Neurontin—has surged in use over the past decade, largely because it’s seen as a safer, less addictive alternative to opioids. But its very mechanism of action may also be its weakness. By suppressing communication between neurons to reduce pain, the drug may unintentionally interfere with the neural connections essential for learning, memory, and cognition.

While earlier studies produced mixed results, the size and scope of this research give new weight to mounting concerns. Importantly, scientists caution that the findings do not yet prove causation. Gabapentin may contribute directly to cognitive decline—or it may be linked indirectly through chronic pain, inflammation, or other underlying conditions. More targeted research is needed to separate cause from correlation.

For now, the message isn’t panic—but prudence. Gabapentin remains effective and appropriate for many patients, but long-term use should come with informed discussions, regular cognitive check-ins, and careful risk–benefit evaluation.

Source: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine (2025)

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JxD7ccjuB/
05/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JxD7ccjuB/

𝗕𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗔𝗻𝗸𝗹𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝗷𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝘄𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻

Introduction 🧠

While a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is often viewed as a simple, innocuous musculoskeletal injury, new research suggests that its consequences extend far beyond the localized damage to ligaments and muscles. A systematic review published in Sports Medicine highlights a critical, often overlooked factor in patient recovery: neuroplasticity. The evidence reveals that individuals who suffer from Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI)—a condition affecting nearly half of all LAS patients—undergo significant structural and functional maladaptations in the central nervous system. These brain-level changes form a distinct "neurosignature" that may perpetuate instability and hinder recovery.

Functional Adaptations: The Brain’s Altered Control Mechanisms ⚙️

When an ankle is injured, the brain alters how it communicates with the joint, leading to several key functional shifts.

⬜ Decreased Corticomotor Excitability
One of the most consistent findings is a reduction in the "excitability" of the motor cortex—specifically the regions responsible for controlling lower limb muscles like the peroneus longus and tibialis anterior. Essentially, the neural pathways become less efficient at firing action potentials to these muscles, resulting in a slowed or inhibited motor output.

⬜ Compensatory Activation Strategies
Patients with CAI often require more cognitive resources to perform simple motor tasks. Electroencephalography studies show increased theta power in the frontal lobe during tasks like landing, suggesting that these patients must focus harder and engage more attention to stabilize themselves than healthy individuals.

⬜ Sensory Decoupling
There is a "decoupling" between the actual looseness of the ankle joint and how the brain perceives it. Neuroplasticity in the somatosensory cortex alters the processing of proprioceptive information, leading to inappropriate reactive responses to joint loading.

⬜ The Neural Correlates of Fear
Injury-related fear is not just psychological; it is neurological. The review notes a deactivation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in patients with CAI. This deactivation correlates with higher fear levels and avoidance behaviors, suggesting that the brain is actively modulating emotional responses to protect the joint, potentially leading to maladaptive avoidance of movement.

Structural Adaptations: Physical Changes in Brain Matter 🧩

The impact of ankle injuries is profound enough to alter the physical structure of the brain, affecting both white and grey matter.

⬜ White Matter Integrity
Research utilizing diffusion tensor imaging indicates reduced integrity in the superior cerebellar peduncle and corticospinal tracts. The superior cerebellar peduncle is crucial for connecting the cerebellum to the brainstem to coordinate movement. A degradation here—manifested as changes in water diffusion and neurite organization—suggests a breakdown in the wiring responsible for postural control.

⬜ Grey Matter Atrophy
Patients with CAI exhibit reduced grey matter volume in the cerebellar vermis and sensorimotor areas. The cerebellum integrates sensory information to fine-tune balance; atrophy in this region correlates with the duration of the instability. This implies that the longer a patient suffers from CAI, the more maladaptive the brain structure becomes.

The "Coper" Phenomenon 🔄

A fascinating distinction exists between patients who develop CAI and copers—individuals who suffer an ankle sprain but recover fully without residual instability. The data suggests that copers do not exhibit the same functional or structural brain adaptations seen in CAI patients. Copers appear to develop effective compensatory strategies that do not involve negative supraspinal changes, whereas CAI patients develop a maladaptive neurosignature that maintains their dysfunction.

Clinical Implications: Treating the Brain, Not Just the Ankle 🧠👣

Current rehabilitation often focuses on the periphery, but the high recurrence rate of ankle sprains suggests this is insufficient. To address the central nervous system changes, rehabilitation must evolve.

⬜ Neuroplastic Training
Interventions should integrate motor learning, balance training, and visual-motor challenges to retrain the brain.

⬜ Addressing Fear
Because neural activity related to fear is altered, clinicians should use tools like the Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Scale to monitor and address psychological barriers during rehab.

⬜ Early Intervention
Since brain adaptations worsen over time, early and effective intervention is critical to prevent the transition from an acute sprain to chronic instability.

Analogy 💻

Imagine the ankle injury as a broken distinct hardware component in a computer, like a damaged mouse. Traditional therapy focuses on fixing the mouse. However, this review reveals that in chronic cases, the computer’s operating system has also become corrupted in an attempt to compensate for the broken mouse. It has rewritten its drivers and even deleted some code. To fully restore function, you cannot simply fix the mouse; you must also update and debug the software, or the system will continue to crash.

-----------------
⚠️Disclaimer: Sharing a study or a part of it is NOT an endorsement. Please read the original article and evaluate critically.⚠️

Link to Article 👇

30/10/2025

Your MRI doesn’t tell your story it only whispers a few lines.
Imaging shows structure, not strength.
It can’t measure resilience, adaptation, or how your body feels and functions.

Far too many surgeries are done because of what’s seen on a screen
tiny “abnormalities” that are often just normal signs of living.
Age-appropriate changes, not emergencies.

Before you rush to fix what may not be broken,
start with movement, education, and a real conversation.
You are not your MRI.
You are more than an image
you are function, healing, and potential in motion

10/10/2025
03/10/2025

The human body is the most powerful machine you’ll ever own

But like any machine, it breaks down when it’s not used.
When you stop moving, you don’t just lose strength, you lose energy, confidence, and the spark that makes you feel alive.

But here’s the truth, motion is maintenance, every move you make is proof to your body that it still has a purpose, and your body rewards you with health, strength and resilience. Don’t let your greatest machine gather dust.

Keep it moving.
Keep it alive.
Keep it strong.

Pregabalin is more commonly known as Lyrica and is often prescribed by GP's for sciatica despite a lack of evidence of e...
17/08/2025

Pregabalin is more commonly known as Lyrica and is often prescribed by GP's for sciatica despite a lack of evidence of efficacy

Most viewed this week from JAMA Network Open: Among beneficiaries aged 65 to 89 with noncancer chronic pain, pregabalin use was associated with a higher incidence of compared to gabapentin, particularly in those with a history of cardiovascular disease.

https://ja.ma/45FXYfj

31/07/2025

Dr Balraj sharing a story from one of his patients with vertigo.

Send a message to learn more

29/07/2025
23/07/2025

I always keep Dr Graeme massagers in stock, here is the man himself explaining more about trigger points.

Address

144 James Cook Drive
Kings Langley, NSW
2147

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 3pm - 7pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Kings Langley Chiropractic Centre:

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram

Category

Our Story

Andrew Lyell has been practising in Kings Langley for over 25 years. He is a member of the Australian Chiropractors Association and Sports Chiropractic Australia.

*** Please note that testimonials are not permitted by AHPRA hence all reviews are hidden****