14/03/2020
The AAT case referred to below shows the downside of relying on the advice of therapists.
Ms Greiner gave evidence that Ms C had told her that she had conducted a “Triple C”, that is, “Checklist of Communication Competencies” assessment on Mr C. Mr Greiner accepted that there was no reason why that assessment could not be used to track Mr C’s progress periodically.
The Triple C – the Checklist of Communication Competencies - relies on physical skills, and so should never be used to make decisions about an individual's potential to use AAC. It is also totally inappropriate for measuring anyone's progress in using communication aids.
The most telling critique of the Triple C was written by Anne McDonald herself in 2001. As she said,
“The Triple C is published by the Spastic Society of Victoria. It is recommended for use by untrained staff at day and residential centres for people with developmental disabilities. Its purpose is unclear, as it is not associated with any intervention programs- all that staff end up with is a list of some things their clients do. As the Triple C stops at about a three-year-old level, it does not include literacy. It does not lead on to any other assessment, so no matter how you score you cannot move beyond being an "intentional referential communicator". In fact, people with severe disabilities are unlikely to make it that far….”
……………
"The importance of the Triple C is its potential to stop people like me ever finding a means of communication. There is no suggestion that any subject should be referred for AAC, not even 'Joe', one of their examples, who "works part-time in a garden nursery and lives semi-independently with a work-mate", "enjoys a good chat" and is rated Stage 6 (ibid, 14). Presumably this is because "research has shown that adults, particularly those who present as pre-intentional or unintentional communicators, are unlikely to progress through a developmental hierarchy. The goal of intervention is instead to increase the frequency of use of existing skills and the establishment of emerging skills." (ibid., 37
"Every person with severe communication impairments believes in miracles. I am one of the few who has experienced one. I was given a voice through AAC, and came out of a mental retardation institution to graduate from university. I didn't do this by progressing through a developmental hierarchy; I did it by learning to read and spell at the age of sixteen. Nothing else about me changed.) [Anne herself, after her graduation, scored as 'pre-intentional re-active' on the Triple C.]"
"Any assessment which suggests that learning is not possible for a given group is founded on prejudice and supports prejudice. Before any checklist or assessment which labels non-speakers is published there should be a process of peer review; review not by professionals but by the peers of those who will be assessed. If a therapist suggests that the Triple C be used with anyone you know, it’s time to find yourself a new therapist."
Bloomberg, K., & West, D., 1999, The Triple C Checklist of Communication Competencies - Assessment Manual and Checklist, Melbourne, SCIOP
(There are later editions, but Anne's references refer to this one.)
Anne McDonald Abstract for presentation delivered at AGOSCI Biennial National Conference, Adelaide, 2001