12/03/2026
We talk a lot in paediatric OT about self-regulation — and many of us use the Alert Program® regularly in practice.
But how often do we stop and think about how consistently it’s actually being delivered?
This week’s OT Learning Hub newsletter (landing Tuesday at 4pm) takes a closer look at something we don’t often discuss when it comes to intervention research: fidelity.
In other words…
Are we delivering the program the way it was designed?
Here’s the paper I’m unpacking for you:
🚗 Blackwell, D., Lane, A. E., Philpott-Robinson, K., & Lane, S. J. (2026). Development of a fidelity instrument for delivering the Alert Program® for self-regulation. OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492261422638
It’s an interesting paper because it doesn’t focus on whether the Alert Program works.
Instead, it steps back and asks a different question — how do we know the program is being delivered consistently across therapists, settings, and studies?
For those of us who use the Alert Program regularly, it’s a really useful reminder that the approach is more than a collection of sensory strategies.
It’s built around a particular structure, language, and therapeutic process that helps children understand and regulate their own “engine levels.”
If you’d like my full breakdown — along with how I think about this in everyday clinical practice — you’re very welcome to join us in the OT Learning Hub.
Over 8,000 paediatric OTs are already reading along each week 💌
👉 https://www.michellenewby.com/OTLearningHubLP
Looking forward to sharing this one.