29/03/2026
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1LyryJyJbh/
Again and again, parenting at no matter what age, will show to you the darkest parts of you (and the generations before you), no matter how many times you've healed. And if you're looking, the parts of you and your child that are incredible 💚
Anne Lamott is pointing to a version of self‑discovery that doesn’t feel aspirational at all. She’s talking about the discovery you make when you can’t leave the room, when a small person depends on you and you realise that the person doing the depending is also revealing who you are under strain. Not the polished adult self you present to the outside world, but the one who is tired, resentful, easily slighted, and sometimes irrationally furious.
In Operating Instructions, she was newly sober, single, raising her son in her late thirties after a life that had already included addiction, depression, and a complicated family history. She wasn’t naïve about her own fragility. And still, motherhood startled her. That’s what so interesting. This wasn’t a woman who believed she was pure and saintly. She’d done therapy, she’d written novels, and examined her life. But a baby altered the conditions of that examination. It’s one thing to analyse yourself in the abstract; it’s another to find yourself gripping the side of a cot at three in the morning, furious because your baby won’t sleep.
The word “secret” is doing work in the quote. Most of us know we’re flawed. We’ll admit to being impatient, controlling and occasionally sharp. But there are layers we keep even from ourselves. Parenting has a way of dragging those layers into the light because the stakes are so immediate. You can’t tell yourself you’re generous if you’re internally bargaining over getting up to your crying baby. You can’t cling to the idea that you’re endlessly giving when you feel a flash of envy towards your own child’s freedom from responsibility.
And there’s a cultural piece to this that women of a certain age feel in their bones. Many of us were raised on the promise that motherhood would be meaningful in a way other achievements weren’t. Later, the script expanded to include career and independence, but the underlying expectation remained that you would find fulfilment here. So when Lamott writes about insanity and brokenness and rage, she’s puncturing a polite myth. She’s acknowledging that meaning doesn’t erase anger. In fact, it can intensify it. The more you care, the more you have to lose, your time, your identity, your sense of competence, and that loss can hurt in ways we don’t openly discuss.
Rachel Cusk wrote about similar feelings in A Life’s Work and was criticised for sounding cold. I remember reading the reviews and feeling slightly defensive on her behalf, and also uneasy, because part of me wanted her to soften it. Why? Because if she’s right, then the maternal self isn’t automatically virtuous. It’s reactive, sometimes petty, and sometimes overwhelmed. That’s harder to integrate into the story we tell about ourselves as good women.
What Lamott admits, and she does it without polishing it, is that parenting removes certain exits. Before children, if you were angry or restless, you could redirect that energy. Work late. Go out. With a child, you remain responsible even when you’re at your very worst. That containment can be clarifying, but it can also feel deeply suffocating. You begin to see how much of your previous calm depended on being able to walk away.
There’s also the matter of control. Many middle‑aged women have built lives on competence. We manage households, teams, friendships, and ageing parents. We’re good at anticipating problems. A baby ignores anticipation and dismantles routines. He exposes how fragile your patience becomes when your systems fail. And you might discover that what you called resilience was actually a preference for predictability.
Of course motherhood can enlarge a person. It can deepen empathy, sharpen priorities, and reorient values. But enlargement includes shadow. You don’t get a wider emotional range without brushing against anger you’d rather not own. Sometimes that anger has roots in your own childhood, which adds another layer, you see your parents’ limitations more clearly, and occasionally you see yourself repeating them despite swearing you wouldn’t. That recognition can feel almost disloyal, even as it brings a strange compassion.
What I appreciate in Lamott is that she doesn’t claim that confronting your rage makes you serene. Sometimes it just makes you aware that you’re capable of it. And maybe that awareness is the work, noticing the flash before it turns into harm, recognising the brokenness without pretending it isn’t there.
There’s a risk in admitting all this. It sounds like ingratitude and weakness. But perhaps it’s simply adulthood in its least curated form, staying in the room with a child and with your own unedited self, and realising they are developing side by side, neither of them as innocent as you once hoped.
© Echoes of Women - Fiona.F, 2026. All rights reserved
