01/01/2026
Being called upon to do the right thing is not always easy but we must work with families remembering and honouring their right to thrive even while they are healing.
Child protection intervention should not continue to determine fates that fuel systemic injustices and the traumatic failures in protecting children’s wellbeing and pathways to self-determination and belonging.
It is more than time to work in truth. Without it, real change will continue to be thwarted by the masks of rebranding, with privilege and power remaining protected, and harm perpetuated for generations to come.
End the disguise.
Building a True Prevention and Kin-First Child Welfare System Requires Bold Structural Change
To genuinely prioritize prevention and kinship care, we must confront a hard truth: you cannot simply add kin-first policies on top of an entrenched non-kin foster care infrastructure. Real transformation demands dismantling and replacing the old system.
• Traditional placement desks (in the U.S.) or resources teams (in Canada) are designed to find stranger-care beds. They default to non-kin options when kin searches take time or resources appear limited.
• A prevention and kin-first system requires standing up an entirely new, smart, urgent, and well-resourced infrastructure focused on:
• Preventing removals through rapid, flexible material and clinical supports for parents. • Urgently identifying, assessing, and connecting with kin—often within hours or days, not weeks. • Reducing long-term material hardship through cross-system partnerships (housing, income, health).
If we keep the old placement machinery intact while claiming prevention and kinship as the goal, we are effectively running a foster care system in disguise. Kinship becomes an afterthought, not the default.
Evidence from partial reforms shows progress is possible when infrastructure shifts: rising kinship placements, fewer entries, and better child outcomes. But lasting change only sticks when the non-kin pipeline is deliberately taken down and replaced with responsive, family-centered alternatives.
Leadership capacity—not family capacity—is the bottleneck. The kinship networks are already there, in fact have been there for generations, previously uninvited and unwelcome. The question is whether agencies have the leadership vision and courage to rebuild their core operations around them.