Creekside Holistic Services

Creekside Holistic Services Wellness Coach/Natural Health Consultant Holistic Counsellor. Together we can find that balanced, exhilarating life you desire. What are you waiting for?

You deserve the good life and all it has to offer. The world is a changing place. We used to rely on doctors with medicines to take care of all our problems. Unfortunately, as time went on we learned that we needed to do more for ourselves if we really wanted to live a long happy healthy life. Holistic counselling is part of finding that long and happy life you seek. A holistic counsellor already

knows the value of natural treatments. He understands that a medical doctor is not always the answer, but is always an option. Like other natural health professionals, holistic counsellors respect your right to privacy. You can be sure the world will never know you are getting a little help to get your life where you want it to be. Everyone deserves happiness, and the right to a long and prosperous life. You deserve to live a life that makes you happy. While the concept of Holistic Counselling is seen as a fairly radical concept by many people in our western culture, the ideas behind holistic counselling are openly used in many cultures around the world and have been used for hundreds of years. Contrary to popular belief, a holistic philosophy does not dismiss western medicine, the truth is that western medicine is considered along with the many other disciplines when determining the ideal solution. Holistic Counselling is built on the notion that using a wide variety of resources and therapies can help people heal themselves, “healing is the primary focus”. It is the holistic belief that most healing originates within each person. Holistic counselling is guided by the notion that mind, body and spirit all interact with one another in ways which we might not always expect to create vitality, passion, purpose, good health and happiness.

I need to talk about mental illness.Not as a slogan. Not as a soft public talking point. Not as a passing emotional stru...
02/26/2026

I need to talk about mental illness.

Not as a slogan. Not as a soft public talking point. Not as a passing emotional struggle people are told to “manage” quietly and politely. I mean mental illness as what it is: an illness. It has always had that word in its name, yet for generations far too much of our health system has treated it as though it were somehow less real, less urgent, or less deserving of care than other illnesses. That is not only medically wrong, it is morally wrong. The World Health Organization is clear that mental disorders are real health conditions that can seriously disrupt a person’s thinking, emotions, behaviour, and daily life. (Statistics Canada)

I have lived with mental illness for most of my life. I know what it is to carry something heavy that other people cannot see. I also know what it is to watch a system respond as though invisible suffering is somehow less serious than visible injury. It is not. Pain that lives in the mind, the nervous system, the emotions, and the spirit can shape a life just as deeply as pain anywhere else in the body. And when that pain is minimized, people are left to survive however they can.

I did not turn to self-medication, but I understand why so many do.
When people are hurting and not being helped, they reach for relief. Sometimes that relief looks like smoking. Sometimes it looks like alcohol. Sometimes it looks like street drugs. Sometimes it looks like gambling, overwork, isolation, or any other behaviour that briefly dulls the pain. In too many cases, our system focuses on the coping behaviour and misses the wound underneath it.

Canada’s own federal approach now openly recognizes that substance use harms must be met with compassionate, evidence-based supports, not shame, because these harms are bound up with health, trauma, and unmet need. (Canada)
That is the part we keep failing to face honestly: for many people, the visible behaviour is not the beginning of the story. It is the symptom. It is the smoke, not the fire.

If we treated the underlying mental illness earlier, more consistently, and with real compassion, many of the crises we now call “complex” might never become so overwhelming. Instead, too often, people are forced to deteriorate in public before anyone takes their pain seriously. By then, families are strained, lives are destabilized, and the cost—human and financial—has multiplied.

Canada’s numbers tell a painful story. Statistics Canada reported that in 2022, more than 5 million people in this country met the criteria for a mood, anxiety, or other mental health disorder. Among them, more than 1 in 3 said their mental health or health care needs were only partly met or not met at all. About half had not even spoken to a health professional about their mental health in the past year. That is not a minor service gap. That is a country-wide failure to reach people before crisis takes hold. (Statistics Canada)

And the situation remains deeply troubling. The Canadian Institute for Health Information reported that in 2024, 41% of adults in Canada with a diagnosed mental health disorder said their needs were only partly met or completely unmet. For young adults, that number rose to 52%. Those are not just statistics. Those are sons, daughters, parents, neighbours, veterans, workers, students, and survivors trying to keep moving forward while the ground under them keeps giving way. (cihi.ca)

We also need to tell the truth about what happened when Canada and other countries closed the old psychiatric institutions. Yes, many of those places were harmful. Yes, they needed to change. But what replaced them was too often not a better road—just a different kind of abandonment. People were pushed into communities that were never properly funded, never properly trained, and never properly prepared to carry that responsibility.

Front-line workers were expected to absorb the fallout. Families were expected to carry what systems dropped. And people living with serious mental illness were expected to somehow survive the gap between what was promised and what was actually built. Evidence from long-standing reviews of deinstitutionalization has warned that community care was too often under-resourced, leaving vulnerable people without the support networks they needed. (cihi.ca)

That gap still shows up everywhere.

It shows up in emergency rooms. It shows up in shelters. It shows up in families already stretched past their limit. It shows up when police become the default response to a mental health crisis because the care system arrived too late—or never came at all. In British Columbia, police standards now require crisis intervention and de-escalation training for front-line officers and supervisors.

That training matters, but the very need for it is also a measure of how often our society meets mental distress with emergency control before it meets it with steady care. (cihi.ca)

And then there are the workers inside the system—social workers, nurses, counsellors, support staff, outreach teams—people who are often trying to do good in structures shaped more by budget lines than by human need. Many are overworked. Many care deeply. But a caring person trapped in a constrained system can only do so much. When policy is governed by scarcity, people in pain start to be treated like cost centres instead of human beings. That is where compassion erodes. That is where trauma deepens. That is where people begin to feel not only sick, but disposable.

A trauma-informed approach would start somewhere very different. It would stop asking why people are “non-compliant,” “difficult,” or “too complex,” and start asking what happened to them, what they have carried, and what they need now to feel safe enough to heal.

Canada has invested in trauma-informed mental health promotion because the evidence is clear that trauma shapes health across a lifetime. But investment without access, policy without capacity, and language without action are not enough. People do not recover because a framework exists on paper. They recover when care is reachable, humane, and strong enough to hold them. (Canada)

This is why I am speaking plainly.

Mental illness is not a character flaw. It is not a weakness. It is not an inconvenience to be managed at the lowest possible cost. And the people living with it are not burdens. They are people already fighting battles most of the world never sees.

Canada is at a precipice on this issue. We can keep pretending that crisis response is care, that partial access is access, and that surviving without support is proof the system works. Or we can decide, finally, that people living with mental illness deserve the same seriousness, urgency, and dignity we claim to offer anyone else who is ill.

I know which road we should take.

We need early care, not just emergency care. We need mental health support that is available before lives collapse. We need treatment that sees the whole person, including trauma, grief, and the coping behaviours that often grow out of untreated pain. We need community systems that are actually funded to do what we say they should do. We need policy shaped by human reality, not just financial restraint. And above all, we need to stop asking people to prove how badly they are suffering before we believe they deserve help.

Because by the time someone is forced to fall apart in public, the system has already failed them.

Key points

• Mental illness is a real health condition, not a lesser form of suffering. (Statistics Canada)

• In Canada, millions live with mood, anxiety, or other mental health disorders, and many still do not get adequate care. (Statistics Canada)

• In 2024, 41% of Canadian adults with a diagnosed mental health disorder reported unmet or only partly met needs. (cihi.ca)

• Substance use and other coping behaviours are often symptoms of deeper pain, not the full story. (Canada)

• Real change means early, trauma-informed, humane care—not just crisis response after the damage is done. (Canada)

So, here is my plea: Change This!

Not with another carefully worded promise. Not with another report that names the problem but leaves people waiting. Change it with funding that reaches the front lines. Change it with systems built around dignity. Change it with care that treats mental illness as illness. Change it before more people are left to medicate pain alone, to unravel in public, or to disappear into the cracks we all know are there.

People living with mental illness do not need to be pitied.
They need to be heard.
They need to be helped.
And they need a country willing to treat their lives as worth the effort.

Funded projects supporting the mental health of those most affected by COVID-19.

11/20/2025

# A perfect storm: and a “positive colon cancer” test

When I, like you, hear phrases like “spots on the lungs,” “lesions on the liver,” and “a positive test for colon cancer,” with my cancer history and cancer found in other family members makes it is easy to assume the worst: late-stage, widely spread cancer. In reality, each of these findings can have **more than one cause**, and sometimes they occur in a way that feels like a perfect storm rather than a clear, straightforward diagnosis.

This article will explain what each of these findings on their own, can mean, and why they **don’t always necessarily equal metastasized cancer**, and why only a careful step by step medical work-up can sort out coincidence from consequence.

# # 1. “Spots on the lungs”: what that actually means

On imaging (often CT scans or X-rays), “spots” on the lungs, usually called **nodules** or **obstructions**. They are actually common, especially as people age or if they have a history of infections, pneumonia, or environmental exposures.

More typical causes of lung spots include:

* **Old infections** (healed fungal infections, pneumonia scars)
* **Benign tumors** (hamartomas, other noncancerous growths)
* **Inflammation** (autoimmune lung disease, sarcoidosis)
* **Vascular changes** (small blood vessel abnormalities)
* **Metastatic cancer** – only one of the many possibilities, not the only one

Radiologists assess spots based on size, shape, borders, calcification patterns, and growth over time. Many nodules are found incidentally and **never turn into anything dangerous**, which is why guidelines specifically emphasize the need for follow-up imaging rather than an immediate cancer panic.

Key point:
You need to look at a lung spot as a **finding**, not a diagnosis. It raises a question; it does not answer anything.

---

# # 2. “Spots on the liver”: more reasons than just metastasis

Similar to the lungs, “spots on the liver” (lesions, masses, or focal abnormalities on ultrasound, CT, or MRI) are actually quite common – and more often than not **benign**.

Here is list of Non-cancer causes for liver spots:

* **Hemangiomas** (benign blood vessel clusters; very common)
* **Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)** – benign overgrowth of liver tissue
* **Hepatic cysts** – fluid-filled sacs, often harmless
* **Fatty infiltration** or focal fat sparing in the setting of fatty liver disease
* **Regenerative nodules** in chronic liver disease
* **Simple Infections or abscesses**

Yes, cancer is on most lists – both **primary liver cancer** and **metastases from other sites (including the colon)** – but, let's be clear, it is **not necessarily the automatic explanation**.

Imaging features are important (contrast patterns, shape, number, and distribution of the spots) and should be paired with blood tests and a biopsy. All these steps are used to definitively separate benign from malignant causes.

Key point:
Just like with the lung spots, liver spots represent a **pattern on an image**, never an immediate cancer verdict.

---

# # 3. A “positive colon cancer test”: what was actually positive?

“A Positive colon cancer test” can mean so many different things:

It should be followed with:
* A **positive f***l occult blood test (FOBT)** or **FIT** (stool test for hidden blood)
* A **positive stool DNA test** (like Cologuard)
* A **suspicious polyp or mass seen on colonoscopy or xray**
* A **biopsy proving cancer** in the colon

The most important distinction here:

* **Screening tests, even (FOBT, FIT, stool DNA)** can be what are called **false positive** or positive for reasons other than the primary one:

* Hemorrhoids
* Polyps that are not cancer
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* Non-cancer bleeding higher up in the digestive tract
* What you need to take from this is that **Only a biopsy** can confirm actual colon cancer.

If a screening test is positive, the standard next step before any assumptions should be made is a **diagnostic colonoscopy** to look directly at the lining of the colon and take biopsies of any suspicious areas.

Key point:
A positive screening test simply means “something needs to be checked,” **definitely not** that “you have cancer everywhere.”

---

# # 4. When all three show up together: coincidence or consequence?

Now we get to the core question:

> Lung spots + liver spots + a positive colon cancer test – is this just a series of consequences, or an unlucky cluster of unrelated coincidences?

There are three broad different possibilities here:

# # # Scenario 1: True metastatic colon cancer (everything is connected)

In this scenario:

* The colon lesion is an actual **biopsy-proven cancer**.
* These Cancer cells have spread via blood or lymphatic channels to:

* The **liver** (most common first site of colon cancer metastasis)
* The **lungs** (another common site for spread)

In that case, the spots in the liver and lungs are consequences of the colon tumor. The findings line up in a, textbook example, and staging scans plus biopsies are needed to confirm the connection.

This is the scenario that everyone fears – of course it is serious – but **it is far from the only explanation**.

---

# # # Scenario 2: Mixed picture – some findings are related, some are not

This is actually more common than most people realize.

Examples:

* The colon lesion is proven to be cancer or an advanced polyp, **but** the lung nodules are from an old infection that left scars and the liver lesion is there, but a benign hemangioma.
* The colon test is positive due to an adenoma or (precancerous polyp) that is easily removed, and as for the liver spots, they turn out to be benign cysts and as for the lung spots, they are small and stable over time.
* A person may have a long-standing fatty liver disease causing irregularities on imaging, **plus** a new colon polyp, **plus** tiny lung nodules from a past infection.

Here, only one part of the picture is actually “cancer,” the rest re basically background noise from a lifetime of wear, tear, and healing.

---

# # # Scenario 3: A true “perfect storm” of unrelated issues

When you consider that Modern imaging is extremely sensitive. Once you start scanning:

* You find old scars, cysts, nodules, and anomalies that have possibly been there for years.
* You pick up colon obstructions or mild inflammation.
* A screening test is a false positive from something minor, such as a small bleed from hemorrhoids.

From the patient’s perspective, at first glance, it feels like all hell breaks loose at once:

* “Spots” on the lungs
* “Spots” on the liver
* A “positive” colon result

But you need to remember that medically, each finding could be unrelated and each could have a benign or reasonable explanation of a manageable condition.

This is just a real “perfect storm”: **multiple ambiguous findings appearing at the same time, before anyone has the full information and can make an informed explanation.** It by its very nature creates a situation that causes maximum anxiety long before there is a clear well informed diagnosis.

---

# # 5. Why appearances alone cannot answer the question

The human brain is genetically wired to connect unrelated dots, after a real or imagined conclusion has been reached. We see three scary findings, connect them (after we google it!) and assume one catastrophic story, lacking any solid proof. Fortunately, Medicine does not work that way.

Sorting out coincidence vs consequence requires:

* **Clarifying questions for what exactly was positive in the colon**

* Was there a biopsy?
* What did pathology show (polyp, early cancer, advanced cancer)?

* **What are the Characteristics of each lung spot**

* Size, number, shape, calcification, PET activity, growth on repeat scans

* **What are the Characteristic of each liver spot**

* MRI with contrast, ultrasound, CT pattern, and if possible, a biopsy

* **Looking at it over time**

* Have these lesions changed over months/years, or are they stable?

Only when you combine all the **imaging patterns, pathology, lab tests, and time** can an oncologist make an informed decision whether this is widespread cancer, partly related disease, or just a cluster of mostly benign findings.

My hope for you is that it is just coincidence!
---

# # 6. Beware of the emotional trap: worst-case scenario thinking

From a Google search standpoint, this topic naturally draws readers who are terrified they (or someone they love) are in a catastrophic situation.

Here is the hard truth:

* Yes, sometimes it is stage IV cancer.
* But, sometimes it is early-stage cancer along with unrelated benign spots.
* Always remember that sometimes it is not cancer at all, just a lot of coincidental findings that just appear to be the worst case scenario.

What usually drives suffering a sound medical determination is made is often **uncertainty**:

* Waiting for biopsy results
* Waiting for repeat imaging
* Hearing the word “spots” with no explanation
* Hearing “positive test” without context

It is clear that proper communication from all clinicians – with the perspective and understanding that **findings are questions, not verdicts!**

---

# # 7. What you or anyone in this situation must realistically expect

If you have lung spots, liver spots, and a positive colon test, you can expect:

1. **A detailed colon evaluation**
Which should include:
* Complete colonoscopy if not already done
* Biopsies of suspicious areas
* Clear pathology report (cancer / precancer / benign)

2. **More focused imaging of liver and lungs**

* CT, MRI, or PET-CT focused on characterizing each lesion
* Radiologist comparison with any previous scans

3. **Possible biopsies**

* If a lesion looks suspicious and would change treatment decisions if a biopsy is done, it may be recommended by your health professional. But may not happen if the radiologist determines it is in a spot they cannot reach with a syringe.

4. **Staging and treatment planning when cancer has been officially confirmed**

* If this truly is colon cancer with metastases, an oncology team will decide what stage the disease has reached and outline youur options (surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, liver-directed treatments, etc.), they will be guided by current evidence and your overall health.

5. **Follow-up if lesions appear benign or indeterminate**

* If spots are small or look benign, doctors may plan **an interval for follow-up scans** to ensure they are not growing or changing.

Unfortunately, none of this is usually fast or comfortable. But it is the only way that doctors can separate **coincidence from consequence** and avoid overtreatment and dangerous delay.

---

# # 8. Conclusion: A perfect storm is just a situation, not a reason for an unfounded sentence

Lung spots, liver spots, and a “positive colon cancer” test together create a storm of fear and uncertainty. The brutal reality is that:

* Sometimes the storm is signaling a large, unwanted yet connected beginning to a cancer story.
* Sometimes it is just a mix of serious and benign issues all at once.
* Sometimes it is purely a coincidence of unrelated findings that fortunately only look connected on paper or Google.

Without biopsy results, detailed imaging reports, and professional interpretation, **Absolutely nobody can honestly say what it really is**.

If you or someone you care about is in this situation right now:

* Push your clinicians for **clear explanations**:

* “What exactly was positive?”
* “What is on the pathology report?”
* “What are the possible causes of these spots?”
* “What are the next steps, and what are we trying to rule in or out at each step?”

* Speak up and ask for copies of any reports so you can see for yourself, the language used, and if you feel it necessary, seek a **second opinion** from another specialist.

A perfect storm of findings does not automatically equal a perfect storm of outcomes. The real story only emerges after each piece is properly investigated – and even then, not until that work is done, any kind of conclusion, confident or otherwise, (good or bad) is guesswork just.

03/27/2024

What's on my mind is mental health. How it has been lumped in with addiction services and stigmatized again. How I have struggled with many of the conditions being treated today that didn't even exist as I was growing up and going through them.

02/06/2024

It is surprising how quickly we lose our intellect as we age. It's a difficult thought to imagine you're forgetting everything you know today. How can life do this to you? I have watched two of my parents go through this recently and I find it almost frightening. The only blessing I can see is that they are unaware that they have lost their memories and for the most part are content if they're simple lives.

Hi Everyone! I wanted to just say that I am having an excellent holiday season with my amazing family, and hope that you...
12/29/2022

Hi Everyone! I wanted to just say that I am having an excellent holiday season with my amazing family, and hope that you RE TOO. Next year is a BIG year for Creekside Holistic Services. I am going to solidify my place in the market. I will be much more vocal and share more important and insightful information with my followers who have been more than patient these last few years. This year makes it all worthwhile. I will share ideas and concepts to improve life, diet, energy, and spiritual well-being. We will work together to make this your year as well. Let's just say I am finally getting the help for my mental health that has been lacking these last few years. In the process, I have learned a lot about our mental health care system. Things that I will share with all of you over the next few months. I am talking about the Canadian Mental Health System for those who may not know that Creekside Holistic Services is in Canada and has been serving Canadians since 2005. If you want to let me know your challenges for the coming year, just message me by pressing the button below. Thank you all and stay in touch!

Don Lester Ph.D. Founder and Holistic Counsellor/Natural Health Consultant

03/12/2015

As we build the tools to grow and promote we build a foundation for the future.

10/17/2014

Address

120/46511 Chilliwack Lake Road
Chilliwack, BC
V2R3S4

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 7pm
Tuesday 9am - 7pm
Wednesday 9am - 7pm
Thursday 9am - 7pm
Friday 10am - 5pm
Saturday 12pm - 4pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Creekside Holistic Services posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Creekside Holistic Services:

Featured

Share