11/08/2025
Some conflicting arguments are not equivalent or inconsequential.
We can argue as to a preference over tea versus coffee.
However, to argue over who gets to eat, or who gets healthcare, or who gets to marry, or who determine one's gender are not arguments of equal weight or merit.
Those are arguments of life and death, of morality of values.
They are inarguable unless your are cold-hearted, without compassion, without feelings for others, without empathy.
I do not argue with folks espousing such opinions.
I learn who they are and what they represent by virtue of what they seek. I learn who to best avoid.
My hope is to marginalize them, to shrink their world, to minimize their voice and influence.
This is not to say withhold from them food or healthcare or whatever the need for their survival, as this is not about turning the tables or vengeance, as with that I become them.
This is about countering the poison of their perspectives and influence by limiting platforms for their voices.
If indeed such persons come to recognize the inhumanity of their views, then we may chat.
Some views are like cancer.
Contain the spread.