12/16/2025
Outcomes belong in every care plan.
We've observed a challenge in chiropractic education over the past two decades. Teaching evidence appraisal skills in the classroom provides value, but without systematic outcome measurement in clinical practice, care becomes difficult to standardize and improve.
When practitioners lack measurement systems, care can vary significantly between visits and providers.
In 2005, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine awarded R25 education grants to four chiropractic institutions. These grants specifically aimed to strengthen research and evidence-based practice curricula, helping practitioners develop skills to search literature and critically assess scientific studies.
That addressed one essential component.
The second component involves tracking patient outcomes in clinical settings. When we teach evidence appraisal without connecting it to measurable patient progress, we miss an opportunity to document clinical reasoning and reduce unwarranted variation in care delivery.
A two-pronged approach links both elements:
→ Practitioners gain skills to evaluate research quality
→ Clinical decisions connect to documented patient outcomes
→ Care becomes more transparent and repeatable over time
Randomized controlled trials continue to provide evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of manual therapies. This growing research foundation strengthens our ability to deliver evidence-informed care when paired with systematic outcome tracking.
We believe documentation of patient outcomes should be standard practice, not optional.
How does your practice approach outcome measurement? We'd value hearing different perspectives on implementing this systematically.