Cycle Breakers Counselling Inc.

Cycle Breakers Counselling Inc. This page is dedicated to supporting the bad a$$es who choose to carry the weight of what came before & the responsibility of what comes next.

Being a cycle breaker is not for the weak and they need to know the work they do MATTERS.

When “Control” Doesn’t Look Like Love BombingI thought they weren’t controlling because they never love-bombed me...” Th...
05/31/2026

When “Control” Doesn’t Look Like Love Bombing

I thought they weren’t controlling because they never love-bombed me...” Then I learned about S*X BOMBING. 

When we think of coercive control, we often look for the “classic” red flags—overwhelming romantic gestures, non-stop gifts, and premature declarations of love. But some controllers skip the romance entirely. Instead, they use hyper-frequent, intense physical intimacy as their primary tool to fast-track psychological attachment. 

This isn’t about mutual connection—it is a calculated tactic designed to build an artificial biochemical bond before you even truly know or trust the person. By flooding your system with oxytocin and dopamine, it creates a smoke screen that masks early boundary-testing, red flags, and basic incompatibilities. 

Once that secure attachment is formed, the trajectory changes.

The bombing stops, and intimacy suddenly becomes a currency—withheld to punish you, or demanded to control you.

You find yourself exhausting your energy trying to chase that initial, intense baseline, confusing “earning back affection” with repairing a normal relationship roadblock. 

If a relationship felt “too fast, too soon” physically—even without traditional romance—your gut was trying to protect you.

You did not miss the signs. You were intentionally overwhelmed. 

Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward breaking the cycle. 

💬 Did you experience this pattern? Drop a comment below to help break the silence and validate someone else’s story. 

🤍 Building a Safe Space Together: We are creating a community right here where survivors can connect, share resources, and help one another navigate the thick of it. You are not alone.

05/31/2026

A shocking custody battle that went viral across the internet is now the focus of Hulu’s new docuseries The Nightmare Upstairs: What Happened to Ty and Bryn? The series follows siblings Ty and Brynlee Larson, who barricaded themselves inside a bedroom for 54 days after a judge ordered them to stay with their father amid a years-long family court dispute involving serious abuse allegations.

The emotional case sparked national debate over family court, child protection, and the controversial concept of “parental alienation.” While their father, Brent Larson, has denied all abuse allegations, the siblings later testified in court about years of alleged mistreatment before he ultimately relinquished his parental rights. The disturbing and deeply emotional story is once again drawing major attention as viewers revisit the case through Hulu’s new documentary.

05/31/2026

What is Pathogenic Parenting?

Let’s talk about a term that explains the exact psychological tug-of-war happening in high-conflict divorces: Pathogenic Parenting.
Pathogenic literally means "pathology-causing."

In severe family conflict, it describes what happens when a controlling partner uses psychological manipulation to systematically pressure a child into rejecting a healthy, safe, and loving parent.

It is one of the most painful extensions of coercive control because it turns the child into an instrument of punishment. Suddenly, the safe parent is painted as the enemy, and the child is forced to adopt a distorted reality just to survive the intense emotional pressure. It is an incredibly heavy, isolating dynamic that standard custody disputes completely mislabel.

If you are in the thick of this right now, please hear this: you are not crazy, and you do not have to carry this weight in isolation.

I am trying to build a community in this space where parents experiencing this can help one another. This is a place where you can look through real resources, talk to people who have actually been through it, and find strength together.

👉 You don't have to navigate this blind. Head over to my profile and click the Linktree to access a library of resources specifically created to help you understand these dynamics, manage the stress, and protect your well-being.

Stay tuned for Part 2, where we break down the specific behavioral signs and symptoms to look for in the child.

05/30/2026

"How do I protect my kids from making the same mistakes I did?" 💔

I get this question so often from parents who have survived coercive control.

There is so much misplaced guilt over what you "missed" in the beginning of your own relationship.

But here is the truth you need to hear: you didn’t miss obvious warning signs. Coercive controllers don’t start out with overt control; they start with love bombing.

They use intense affection, rush the timeline, and mask constant tracking as "just caring about you." It’s designed to look like true love.
If we want to protect the next generation, we have to teach them what genuine, healthy love actually looks like.

Healthy love doesn't rush you. It respects your boundaries, values your independence, and brings peace—not anxiety masked as passion.

Whether you are trying to break the cycle for your children or heal your own younger self, you don't have to navigate this alone.

🔗 Head to my Linktree and grab the Healthy Relationships Workbook. It breaks down the exact differences between control and true connection so you can empower your family with the tools to spot the difference.

Let's change the narrative for our kids. Drop a comment below if you're breaking the cycle. 👇

05/29/2026

The silence of a survivor is never what it looks like from the outside. 🤫

When people ask, "Why didn't you just say something sooner?" they don't understand that keeping those secrets isn't giving up, and it isn't compliance—it is a day-by-day survival strategy to manage the control and protect themselves and their children from immediate retaliation behind closed doors.

Of course, breaking the silence and speaking up when it is safe to do so is the ultimate goal.

But until that moment comes, that silence is a protective shield, not agreement.

If you have a loved one who seems stuck in a controlling cycle, please don't judge or pressure them.

Your judgment only deepens their isolation, which is exactly what the controller wants. Instead, focus on keeping the connection alive.

For everyone quietly navigating this reality right now, please know this community has your back.

You are doing what you need to do to get through it until you can safely take your next steps.

🔗 I’ve added specific resources to my Linktree on how to safely support a loved one, build up their self-esteem, and protect their self-worth without pushing them away. Let’s change how we talk about this. 👇

05/28/2026

Mind your business." "What happens behind closed doors stays there." 🤫

These are the exact comments I’ve been getting lately, and we need to call it what it is: a shield for abuse.

Coercive controllers thrive in isolation, and they rely on outsiders staying silent to maintain total control.

But it IS our business. When bystanders choose silence, we become complicit.

Now, let’s be entirely clear about something: if a survivor is asking us to keep a secret to protect their physical or emotional safety, that is a completely different situation. We follow their lead to keep them safe.

But when outsiders, enablers, or abusers tell us to mind our own damn business?

That is a tactic to keep abuse in the dark.

I’m also getting messages from survivors who are secretly watching, asking for the signs so they can validate their reality and keep themselves safe right now. If you are quietly trying to figure out your next steps, please trust your gut.

Whether you are trying to navigate your own situation safely, or you want to know how to safely support a loved one stuck in a coercive relationship, head to my Linktree.

I’ve put together specific resources on how to safely stand by someone, build up self-esteem, and help them reclaim their self-worth so they can eventually get out.

We don't protect the secrets of controllers.

Drop a comment below if you’re ready to stop keeping their secrets. 👇

05/28/2026

Why do so many victims stay? Because they are terrified of what happens to their kids if they leave. 💔

In Canada, family violence against children has jumped 26% since 2018, yet our family courts are still ordering forced 'reunification' with abusers and ignoring coercive control.

This is a systemic failure, and it’s exactly why we need to push for Bill C-16 and Bill C-223.
If you are in the thick of this right now, please know you are not alone.

I am building a community right here for parents and families to share resources, connect, and help one another through the trauma.

Let’s talk in the comments. Have you or someone you love faced this in the court system? 👇

05/27/2026

We are wrapping up our 4-part series on Bill C-223 (The Keeping Children Safe Act) by exposing the hidden biases that protective parents face in family court—and how this proposed legislation plans to smash them. 🛑🇨🇦

For too long, survivors of family violence have walked into courtrooms only to have their experiences dismissed by outdated myths and stereotypes.

Assumptions like "if it was really that bad, you would have left sooner," or "if there are no physical bruises, it isn't real abuse" have systematically put children in danger.

📊 The Proposed Evidentiary Standard
If passed, Bill C-223 would force a massive shift in how judges evaluate family violence and coercive control:

Dismantling Myths: The bill creates an explicit requirement for courts to ground their decisions in objective, social-science data regarding the reality of trauma, post-separation abuse, and coercive control.

Fact Over Friction: It prevents courts from relying on personal biases or outdated stereotypes about how a victim "should" act, forcing the legal system to look directly at the real-world behavioral evidence.

Prioritizing Child Safety: By removing these unscientific assumptions, the court's focus is forced back to where it belongs: the physical and psychological safety of the child.

05/26/2026

Part 3 of our deep dive into Bill C-223 (The Keeping Children Safe Act) tackles a massive, proposed structural shift that could change family law offices across Canada. 🏛️

For decades, protective parents navigating a high-conflict separation have carried the exhausting, traumatic burden of having to prove their own abuse to a legal system that often minimizes it.

Bill C-223 aims to completely uproot this dynamic by placing a strict, screening responsibility directly onto legal professionals at the absolute outset of a file.

🛡️ Section 7.7: The Proposed Screening Mandate
If enacted, this bill would introduce rigorous new obligations to the federal Divorce Act:

A Legal Duty to Screen: Legal advisers undertaking to act on a spouse's behalf would be legally mandated to systematically assess whether there are reasonable grounds to believe a risk of family violence or coercive control exists.

The Safety Plan Requirement: If a risk is flagged during intake, the lawyer could not simply proceed with standard litigation. They would have a statutory duty to take active steps to implement an appropriate safety plan and immediately connect the client to specialized community support services.

Proactive Protection: By forcing screening at the very beginning of a file, this framework aims to prevent abusers from using rapid, aggressive legal tactics to overwhelm a protective parent before safety parameters are ever formally established.

If you are a parent currently in the thick of this right now, please know that you do not have to carry this heavy burden alone. We are building a dedicated community in this space where protective and alienated parents can support one another, share resources, and talk to people who truly understand this path.

What are your thoughts on making family violence screening a legal requirement for all lawyers? Let’s discuss the facts in the comments. 👇

05/25/2026

REUNIFICATION THERAPY:

Why is the Canadian House of Commons debating Bill C-223? Because court-ordered "reunification therapy" is facing severe international scrutiny. 🏛️🇨🇦

If you are a protective parent navigating a high-conflict custody separation involving domestic violence or coercive control, here is where the science—and the law—stands right now:

📊 The Facts on Reunification Therapy:

No Scientific Basis: Expert briefs submitted to Parliament confirm there is no peer-reviewed scientific literature proving the long-term safety or efficacy of forced reunification programs.

The United Nations Verdict: In June 2023, the UN Human Rights Council explicitly called on member states to prohibit court-ordered reunification camps due to the severe, documented trauma they inflict on children by cutting off safe attachment figures.

The "Property" Default: Bill C-223 targets a critical systemic issue—family courts too frequently default to a mechanical, 50/50 time split, treating children like assets to be divided rather than centering actual safety and trauma.

🛡️ How Bill C-223 Rewrites the Rules:
This proposed legislation (The Keeping Children Safe Act) aims to add strict boundaries to the federal Divorce Act:

1 Section 16(4.1)(a): Prohibits a judge from cutting a safe parent's time solely to "force" a relationship with an unsafe parent.

2 Section 16(4.1)(b): Completely bans court-ordered reunification programs or camps without explicit, voluntary consent.

A child's natural trauma response should never be pathologized or legally punished. Protecting the safe parent IS protecting the child.

If you are a parent currently in the thick of this right now, please know you are not alone. I am trying to build a dedicated community in this space where alienated and protective parents can help one another, share resources, and talk to others who have been through it.

Check out the link in my bio for a library of resources to help you navigate this.
Let's discuss the facts in the comments. 👇

What are your thoughts on these upcoming legal changes?

Address

131 First Avenue, #301
Spruce Grove, AB
T7X2H4

Opening Hours

Monday 10am - 5pm
Tuesday 10am - 5pm
Wednesday 10am - 5pm
Thursday 10am - 5pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Cycle Breakers Counselling Inc. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Cycle Breakers Counselling Inc.:

Shortcuts

Share

Category