12/18/2025
Thank you for combatting this misinformation. Shame on the Eastern Graphic.
The complexity of family medicine needs to be better understood—especially as health policy is created. This PEI article relies on oversimplified assumptions that end up devaluing the work of family doctors.
🏥 You cannot project capacity by equating nurse practitioner panels (400–900) with family physician panels (avg. ~1,350). They are not interchangeable roles.
⚕️Many family physicians work part-time for legitimate reasons (including caregiving) and cannot be expected to carry full-time panel sizes.
👩⚕️ Family doctors deliver care across multiple settings—clinics, hospitals, long-term care, addictions, palliative care, homecare —which directly limits how many patients they can roster.
🩺 Inflated panel sizes mean worse access, lower patient satisfaction, and less in-depth care.
If we’re serious about addressing Canada’s family doctor shortage, we need to start by clearly understanding their work environment and clinical reality—not narratives that blame family physicians for systemic failures.
The CFPC’s document on panel sizes in Canada (link in the first comment) has more in-depth analysis.