02/04/2026
The JAMA study critics won't discuss.
While some focus on what spinal manipulation 'can't do,' a major JAMA meta-analysis paints a different picture. It details 10-point pain improvements and a perfect safety record across 1,711 patients. Why is this positive evidence often overlooked?
JAMA published a meta-analysis of 26 trials with 1,711 patients.
The results were boringly consistent.
-> Spinal manipulation showed a 10-point improvement on a 100-point pain scale.
-> Zero serious adverse events were reported across the board.
Zero.
The critics usually scream about what this therapy *can't* achieve. They focus on the limitations because it fits their narrative better than the successes do. But the research explicitly highlights what it *can* do.
Evidence is annoying like that.... it really doesn't care about opinions.
We have over a thousand patients who saw real change.
That data point is worth more than a skeptical theory.
Like & Comment "Facts" if you're tired of people ignoring the science. 👇