Neurofeedback Bogotá

Neurofeedback Bogotá Es una técnica de entrenamiento cerebral que produce una mejor calidad de vida.

Es una técnica de entrenamiento cerebral basada en la actividad eléctrica del cerebro. A través de un software (Peliculas y videojuegos) y 3 tres electrodos en la cabeza, se entrena al cerebro por medio de señales auditivas y visuales para que funcione de una manera armóica

01/12/2013

Your Brain and Neurofeedback: A Beginner's Manual

Dr. Dana McDougall
Chartered Psychologist
Mission Bridge Psychological Associates
Calgary, Alberta

Introduction to Biofeedback and Neurofeedback

Biofeedback as a field has been growing since the late 1960s. This form of training and treatment uses monitoring instruments attached to the body to "feed back" to people information on the functioning of their bodies. In this way, people view information of which they are not normally aware, such as hand temperature, blood pressure, number and depth of breaths being taken, level of muscle tension in any target muscle, or the electrical activity of their brains. It has been established that, once people have more detailed access to information on what their bodies are doing, they are able to either consciously or subconsciously alter or control those functions. In this way, people with tension headaches can learn to relax tense muscles, people with urinary incontinence can learn to control their bladders, people with Raynaud's disease (circulation difficulties in the extremities) can learn to warm themselves by increasing blood flow, and people with high blood pressure can learn to control that symptom.

Of particular interest to psychologists is the electrical functioning of the brain. The form of biofeedback that enables people to alter brain electrical activity is called "neurofeedback" (or EEG biofeedback). The reason that neurofeedback is of special concern to psychologists is that the brain is a central contributor to the emotions, physical symptoms, thoughts, and behaviours that define many problems for which people seek psychological consultation. Problems being addressed through neurofeedback include anxiety, depression, attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, memory difficulties and general cognitive functioning, learning disabilities, head injury, obsessive-compulsive disorder, chronic pain, epilepsy, immune system disturbances, panic attacks, sleep disturbances, and more. Scientists have identified specific patterns of brainwaves that contribute to a lack of wellness, and that tend to be related to disorders such as some of those listed here.

The Mind-Body Connection

Biofeedback, including neurofeedback, is based on the increasingly accepted idea of the interconnectedness of mind and body. Recognition of the mind-body connection is becoming a standard in the practice of a healthy lifestyle, and many health professionals assert that the health of mind is intimately connected with the health of body. Is your brain "mind" or "body"? The answer that makes the most sense is, "It is both."

During the past 30 years, there has been a powerful scientific movement to explore the mind's capacity to affect the body and to rediscover ways in which the mind affects and is affected by the body and all of its functions. Investigation of the mind-body connection has been encouraged by the rise in chronic illnesses that appear to be related to environmental and emotional stress: heart disease, cancer, depression, arthritis, and asthma included. Also being examined are specific links between mental processes and the functioning of immune and nervous system functioning.

Mounting evidence of the mind-body connection includes the following findings and facts:

· Researchers in the area of obsessive-compulsive disorder have found that the changes that occur during "talk therapy" are visible in "before" and "after" PET scans. PET scans measure the metabolic activity in various parts of the brain. Thus, talk therapy has been found to alter brain functioning.

· Researchers in the area of fitness found that a group of "couch potatoes" who simply closed their eyes and visualized doing physical exercise actually increased their muscle mass by 16%.

· If a person imagines moving a particular body part, the part of the cortex associated with that body part will show some indication that the body part actually IS moving.

· Strong negative emotions, which can be triggered during abuse situations, trigger the release of toxic neurochemicals such as cortisol, which dramatically influence the developing brain in a way that makes people more vulnerable to anxiety and depression throughout the lifespan.

· One study found that medical students who experienced high levels of stress during exam week produced lesser levels of a particular messenger molecule, which resulted in compromised immune system functioning. Thus, emotional stress (mind) translated into physical effect (body) and many of them got sick. This same messenger molecule has been shown to be related to the immune system's ability to fight some types of cancer (interleukin-2).

· Antidepressant drugs change the availability of neurochemicals in the brain, such that changes in thought, mood, and behaviour result.

These are just a few of the phenomena that make it increasingly difficult to talk about the mind and the body as separate entities. Mind changes are body changes, and body changes are mind changes. Neurofeedback is a therapy of training the mind and body to function in a more optimal way in order to ease negative emotional, cognitive, physical, and behavioural experiences. It is seen by many people as a viable alternative to medication, instead encouraging and nurturing the body's own ability to reorganize, change, and heal itself in a natural way.

In the remainder of this paper, you will learn about:

o The Birth of Neurofeedback as a Discipline

o Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG)

o The Variables of Brain Functioning

o The Experience of Neurofeedback

o Whether Neurofeedback May Be Right for You.

The Birth of Neurofeedback as a Discipline

n the early 1960s at the University of Chicago, psychologist Joe Kamiya made the discovery that some of his research subjects could learn to alter the power and speed of their brainwaves if they were provided with information on the activity of their brains.

Barry Sterman also did research involving neurofeedback in the 1960s. He found that cats could learn to alter their brainwaves if they were given rewards for producing the "goal" brainwave. With repeated exposure to neurofeedback training, the cats became adept at doing so. Sterman's subsequent research project studied the effects of rocket fuel toxicity. Sterman injected cats with the rocket fuel, and found a close relationship between the cats' seizure activity and the amount of exposure to rocket fuel. The more rocket fuel, the more seizures. It is always scientifically pleasing to find a straightforward relationship, and Sterman began to make some conclusions from his results. However, he began to get results that did not fit the relationship he had been establishing. Some of these cats seemed to remain seizure free, even at dosages that had made other cats erupt into seizures. Upon further examination, Sterman found that it was his neurofeedback cats (that had been transferred to the rocket fuel study) that were throwing off his results. This finding was impressive: the cats who had received neurofeedback had a higher seizure threshold than did other cats. There was a clear clinical application that had not been apparent before. Research on neurofeedback for epilepsy began.

While these were astounding discoveries, this technique soon fell into disrepute for a number of reasons: some parties made claims for neurofeedback that were not yet supported by science; other involved parties formed a close link with "flakier" movements that compromised the scientific integrity of the discipline; and still others thought that this technique was too close to "mind control." The result was that neurofeedback was kept only barely alive by a few diehard pioneers until its revival in the 1980s.

The field of neurofeedback has grown very rapidly in the last 20 years, and especially in the last 10 years. The number of practitioners worldwide is approaching 2000, with the bulk of those practitioners residing in the U.S.A. There is a small scattering of practitioners across Canada. The field is beginning to recover from the low esteem in which it was formerly held - now, the science is catching up with the claims that have been made for its efficacy. Even while new information is being collected and published, many health professionals such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and family physicians are unaware of current developments in the field.

Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG)

he electroencephalograph (EEG) has been studied and applied since the early 20th century as a way of looking at the electrical functioning of the brain. Billions of neurons in the cortex, which are also influenced by structures that are deeper beneath the cortex, produce electrical activity that is readable by attaching sensors to the scalp. Because of the skull, the impulses are very faint at the level of the scalp. The electroencephalograph amplifies those faint impulses so they may be viewed by the human eye.

As digital computer technology developed in the 1960s and 1970s, scientists were able to more precisely examine a person's electrical brain functioning in ways that were not possible through a simple visual inspection of raw brain wave tracings. The computer can calculate and make visible many features of the EEG that the human eye can not. This form of computer analyzed brainwaves is called quantitative EEG, or qEEG.

Recording of the qEEG involves placing an elastic cap on the head, with 19 sensors held in place on the scalp. In addition, a clip on each earlobe provides a reference point for the brain activity. Because there is very little electrical activity in the earlobes, they are much more electrically "dead" than scalp sites. Once the cap has been placed, each of the 19 sensors is checked to ensure that it has a good connection with the scalp. The electrical activity at each of the 19 scalp sites is then recorded and calculated by comparing it to the more electrically neutral earlobe. Data on the electrical functioning of the brain is recorded simultaneously at each of the 19 sites. One set of data is recorded with eyes open, and a second set is recorded with eyes closed. During recording of the brainwave data, it is very important to remain as still as possible so as not to contaminate it with a lot of electrical "noise."

Prior to the quantitative analysis of the brainwave recordings, the data is "artifacted." An artifact is defined as any activity that can be seen in the EEG recording that is not actually brain activity. For example, muscles also operate electrically. This means that any muscle tension on the scalp, the forehead, or anywhere near the sensors will be picked up by the sensor. This "artifact" is electrical noise that must be cleaned out of the brainwave recording in order to ensure that the results reflect brain activity and not some other irrelevant information.

Once the brainwave recording is cleaned up, it is put through a number of analyses by the computer, and the result is a collection of measurements. A number of variables of brain functioning are calculated and compared to a database comprised of a collection of measurements taken from people who are free of difficulties, injury, and disease. Scientists have created such databases to enable the comparison of one individual's brain functioning to a group of others of the same age and gender. In this way, an individual's brain may be evaluated in terms of how much its functioning departs from "normal" or "optimal." These variables of functioning and the degree to which they are higher or lower than optimal are of interest in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of an individual's brain functioning. An outline of some key variables follows.

The Variables of Brain Functioning

Quantitative analysis of brainwaves produces measurements of frequency, amplitude, symmetry, coherence, and others (these measures are described below). The report of the analysis provides a value for each of these variables for each of the 19 sites at which the brainwaves have been measured. Each value represents how much the activity at a given site differs from usual. Values that are positive (i.e. +2.4) represent activity that is higher than usual, and values that are negative (i.e. -2.4) represent activity that is lower than usual. Because each value represents how different a site is from usual, the number "0" represents a close match with the brains to which an individual's brain has been compared.

Frequency

Frequency refers to the rate at which a brainwave repeats its cycle within one second. The number of cycles per second is called "hertz" (Hz). The more times a brainwave repeats its cycle per second, the FASTER it is said to be. Some practitioners divide the frequency of brainwaves into categories:

o 0-4 Hz Delta

o 4-8 Hz Theta

o 8-12 Hz Alpha

o 12 Hz and above Beta

Delta waves occur primarily during sleep, however, they are also present to various degrees throughout normal brains when awake.

Theta waves are also slow waves, and are often associated with twilight states such as that between sleep and wakefulness. Theta is much more complicated than this simple explanation, as it has also been shown to be important in memory consolidation.

Alpha is thought of as an idling rhythm, sometimes associated with relaxation or meditation. Alpha is also associated with multi-tasking. For example, a person is multi-tasking when he is focused on many things at once such as ironing a shirt, listening to the weather report, and wondering what is for breakfast. Alpha is produced by large groups of neurons that are not engaged in any particular task, but rather, are standing at the ready to serve a function should they be called upon. Alpha may be likened to "the ready position" in volleyball, or a car sitting in neutral.

Beta is the fastest and most active form of brainwave, and is associated with focus and concentration. When excessively present, Beta can contribute to anxiety. Consider how much focus and concentration one may have while driving down a busy freeway in a snowstorm: this is focus that is exaggerated to the point of possible anxiety.

Frequency is one of the parameters of brain functioning that has to do with the speed of the brainwave or how many times it repeats itself per second. All sites of the brain show all frequencies of activity, however, the amount of a particular frequency that is desirable depends on where it is located in the brain. In general, concentrations of alpha are found at the back of the head, and faster waves are more prominent at the front of the head. Thus, no brain wave is good or bad. It is simply more or less adaptive, depending upon where it is concentrated in the brain.

Amplitude

The amplitude of the EEG is defined as the voltage in microVolts. Another way to think of amplitude is in terms of power or how much energy is being put into a particular brainwave. Put simply, the amplitude can be thought of as the "volume" of the brainwave. A high amplitude theta signal at a particular site means that a lot of energy or power is being put into theta at that site.

Symmetry

Symmetry is the degree to which the activity at a particular site on one side of the brain is similar to the corresponding site on the other side. In this way, a person can serve as his or her own reference. For the most part, the activity at one site should look similar to the activity at the corresponding site on the opposite side of the head. Recording data simultaneously from each of the 19 sites enables the symmetry between left and right to be calculated.

Coherence

Coherence is a measure of how closely each site communicates with each other site. There is an ideal amount of communication that should take place among sites. With too much communication, the brain is devoting too much energy to doing the same thing - this is not a good use of resources. With too little communication between sites, the brain also is not using its resources most optimally. Communication in the brain may be thought of in the context of the crew on a sailing vessel. If the captain issues an order for some of the crew to solve a problem on one side of the ship, it would not be wise for the entire crew to rush over and leave the rest of the ship unattended. Further, if none of the crew communicated with each other, the running of the ship would quickly become disorganized. Recording data simultaneously from each of the 19 sites enables calculation of the coherence (or level of communication between each pair of sites).

The Experience of Neurofeedback

Once the specifics of an individual's brain functioning have been assessed, psychologists look for connections between troubling symptoms and the strengths and weaknesses that have been identified by the qEEG. While the qEEG often reveals generalized problems in brain functioning that will influence many aspects of the individual's experience, people most often seek assistance from psychologists for a particular difficulty - the qEEG variable that most closely matches the complaint of the individual will be addressed first.

It is on the basis of this "strengths and weaknesses" profile that the psychologist will write a computer program to assist the individual in the learning process that will lead to the enhancement of strengths, or, more often, the amelioration of weaknesses. For example, if qEEG assessment shows that an individual has too much slow activity (theta) and not enough fast activity (beta) at the front of the brain, and that person's complaint is of attentional difficulties (which matches the complaint of frontal slowing), training will consist of inhibiting the slow (theta) activity and enhancing faster activity (beta).

The individual receiving neurofeedback training wears a clip on each ear, one sensor on the forehead, and one sensor on the site that has been targetted for training (i.e. the site(s) that the qEEG indicated was different from usual). The sensor that is designated as the "target" site is referred to as the "active sensor." The brainwave activity recorded by the active sensor is displayed on the computer monitor, perhaps as a coloured bar. In the example above, where the goal is to enhance faster activity (beta), the coloured bar represents beta and fluctuates up and down with the individual's beta waves. Also visible on the screen is a "high jump bar" or threshold, set at an appropriate level such that the beta activity is able to "jump over it" (exceed the threshold) at least 60% of the time. Each time the beta "jumps" over the "high jump" (i.e. each time the beta recording reaches or exceeds the goal threshold that was set for it), the computer emits a pleasant tone. With repeated exposure to this form of feedback, that is both visual and auditory, the brain begins to recognize a relationship between its own activity and what it is observing on the computer monitor. In other words, the brain begins to recognize itself. This is when learning begins to take place.

Once the brain "catches on" to what it needs to do in order to make the high jump successfully and to hear the pleasant tone, it begins to do so more consistently. This sounds rather unbelievable, however, it has been established that this process occurs. Fortunately, the changes are quantifiable and observable through measurements taken during neurofeedback sessions, as well as through follow up qEEG assessments.

Learning may be looked at in three ways: subconscious learning, the forming of a conscious association between feelings and brain states, and the development of flexibility in neural pathways.

Subconscious learning occurs in a process whereby the brain, at a level below awareness, begins to recognize itself on the computer monitor and to make the changes required to keep the bar above the high jump. As this is occurring, the individual may feel quite disconnected from the process. People feel as though they are simply watching the display and listening to the tones, without experiencing it as a personal process being driven by their own neural activity. This learning is on a subconscious level. Remember, cats and other animals can learn to alter their brain functioning when appropriate rewards are utilized - they certainly are not consciously considering what they need to do in order to receive the reward. This learning process occurs over time and outside the level of conscious awareness.

The second way that learning occurs is through the conscious association between indications that the target is being met (i.e. the visual and auditory cues) and how the individual feels. Often, a description of how it feels to meet the target defies words. For example, many people are unable to express in words what "more alpha" feels like although they can tell when it is occurring. This process of learning is conscious, and involves the development of an awareness of sensations in one's body that was not present before. In this way, individuals are able to voluntarily do what is necessary in order to produce that sensation at will. There is the sense that, "this is what it is supposed to feel like when I produce more alpha."

Finally, change through neurofeedback occurs as a result of exercising underdeveloped neural pathways. The more the brain practices moving into a more optimal state, the more flexible it will be in responding to demands.

Neurofeedback is seldom used in isolation from other techniques. It is usual for a session with your psychologist to include neurofeedback as well as other techniques such as EMDR and/or cognitive-behavioural exercises to support the changes you would like to make in your life.

Is Neurofeedback Right for You?

Engaging in neurofeedback requires a strong commitment, as people may not experience the beneficial effects for ten or more sessions. Some conditions will require forty or more sessions. It is usually not helpful for people to engage in a highly limited number of sessions, as change does not occur quickly. It requires a time commitment as well as a financial commitment, and you must be prepared for both. Preliminary indications have shown that the changes appear to be permanent, with booster sessions sometimes being necessary if some type of life experience or use of a substance compromises gains that have been made.

Neurofeedback is very helpful for many people, depending upon the particular problem that they want to address. Those who are interested should be aware that it is a form of training that is considered experimental by many people. You should read the attached consent form carefully for more information.

Neurofeedback is a healthy alternative to other forms of treatment that are more invasive, such as the use of medications that may have troubling side effects. Neurofeedback, used by qualified practitioners, is largely free of side effects. Possible side effects that may occur are managed as they come up, by making slight changes to the way in which treatment is delivered. For example, a protocol to increase faster activity, if delivered late in the day, may make for some difficulty in sleeping that night. With slight modifications, side effects are easily managed. Another possibly uncomfortable effect of neurofeedback is emotional: when changing the activity of the brain, it is possible that a person may notice an emotional change such as the surfacing of difficult emotions that you may have experienced in the past. While this is sometimes initially troubling for people, it also forms an integral part of the treatment as people learn to better manage their emotions and to process past experiences that may have been difficult.

As you think about whether or not to engage in this process, you should:

o Consider the time involved

o Consider the cost involved

o Consider your commitment to this process

o Ask lots of questions of your psychologist

o Do your own research to make an educated decision about whether or not this process is right for you

o Review the attached consent form closely with your psychologist

o Consider whether neurofeedback might be a useful addition to other forms of treatment such as psychotherapy, physical therapy, medication, etc. or whether one of these other forms of treatment might be appropriate for you.

01/12/2013

Neurofeedback in combination with traditional counselling and psychotherapy

An excerpt from a post on the NeurOptimal (TM) Website by a psychotherapist who works with neurofeedback and traditional talk therapy:

I have clients who come to me to do traditional talk therapy and these clients indicate that how I work with them is very effective, either in a short or long term therapeutic relationship. Many of these clients also see the benefits in combining traditional approaches with more scientific, up-to-date approaches that help heal unresolved biological problems that keep dysfunctional behaviors in place. and that talk therapy cannot address in many cases.

Example: I have a person who was referred to me by a colleague who I share offices with. This individual has long standing anxiety, depression, and debilitating stress issues. My colleague referred this person to me because we have worked as supervisors in the past in a local mental health agency; but he also knows my background and training in approaches like brain biofeedback, somatic psychotherap and so on- and how using it along with talk therapy can speed the healing process. So with this person who has long time issues, I know from years of experience that it could take months or longer to produce noticeable changes in his life because of his age and his family of origin patterns and because how our brain develops neurologically in dysfunctional environments; what we are doing, thinking and experiencing is what we are becoming- literally.

Most therapists don't talk about the difficult cases- they talk about their success cases. But to be honest, we have to be straight about the limitations of ONLY talking about our problems. Talking can be most helpful, but without other ways of affecting the neurotransmitters and hormones, which are at the basis of our automatic and unconscious survival self, movement is often slow, and up and down at best. Any honest therapist will admit this openly.

So I see this gentleman and we do traditional talk therapy WHILE he receives brain biofeedback. I use a form of brain biofeedback, also called neurofeedback, that goes underneath the conscious mind and communicates directly with his sub-conscious or instinctual self, letting it know in its language about its turbulent and dysfinctional behaviors (we measure energy differences in the brain or called brainwave activity). This man is experiencing a cessation of suffering with is immediate and will become cumulative with ongoing visits. After last weeks session (number 2 visit), he said that he had a beautiful evening, driving home enjoying the scenery, enjoying the beauty of the mountains- rather than his norm of suffering with stress and anxiety. Yes, his patterns returned the next day, though not exactly to the same degree; and with ongoing sessions, he will notice a lifting of symptoms. With the talk therapy, we will help him begin to make the necessary changes in his daily life to avoid generating these feelings, emotions, and thoughts in the future.

So, let's do traditional counseling- combined with the most up to date and effective neurofeedback approach that matches our current science in brain neuroplasticity. Lets harness the brain's ability to improve its effectiveness and resiliency by producing new and higher ordered networks. We now recognize that it takes tremendous energy to keep dysfunctional behavior going, so improved brain regulation has a big impact on our lives. Brain research now shows that most of our suffering states are generated unconsciously inside our nervous system in the present moment, so it makes sense to train the brain to regulate those states by working directly with unconscious neurological processes.

01/12/2013

ADHD NeuroScience Letters

This summary is from a recent issue of Attention Research Update, edited by David Rabiner of Duke University

The original journal article appeared in NeuroScience Letters
Volume 394, Issue 3 , 20 February 2006, Pages 216-221 ( #11)

Neurofeedback is a popular albeit controversial intervention used in the treatment of ADHD. Scientists have known for many years that the brain emits various brainwaves that are indicative of the electrical activity of the brain and that different types of brainwaves are emitted depending on whether the person is in a focused and attentive state or a drowsy/day-dreaming state.

Neurofeedback allows a person to view these brainwaves on a computer screen as they occur. By teaching a person to produce brainwave patterns that are associated with a relaxed, alert, and focused state, and having them practice this skill for many hours of training, neurofeedback practitioners contend that individuals with ADHD can learn to maintain this state and that many symptoms of ADHD will diminish. Many scientists do not believe that such claims have been sufficiently documented, however.

A typical clinical session of neurofeedback training for a child with ADHD involves pasting electrodes (sensors that pick up the electrical activity of the brain) to the head with conductive gel. Wires from these electrodes are connected to a device that amplifies the small signal obtained from the electrodes. The child sits in a comfortable chair and watches a computer monitor. The monitor displays a picture such as a moving graph that indicates the degree to which the child is producing the desired pattern of brainwave activity. The goal is for the child to learn to produce the type of brainwave activity that is associated with a focused and attentive state.

Over the course of numerous training sessions it may gradually become easier for the child to achieve this state and to maintain it for longer periods of time. Proponents of neurofeedback often describe this training as an exercise program for the brain, and training continues until the client demonstrates the ability to consistently achieve and maintain a pattern of EEG activity indicative of a relaxed and attentive state. This typically requires 40-60 sessions.

By the conclusion of treatment, neurofeedback advocates believe that increases in attention and reductions in impulsivity that are evident during training will transfer to important areas of the child's life - e.g. home and school - and there are several published studies (see below) that are consistent with this position. Critics of neurofeedback, however, do not believe there is credible evidence to indicate that such transfer occurs.

** Prior Neurofeedback Research Reviewed in Attention Research Update **

In prior issues of Attention Research Update I have reviewed several neurofeedback studies that highlight the promise of this approach for helping individuals with ADHD. In the first study (Monastra et al., 2001), 101 children and adolescents with AD/HD received multimodal treatment that included stimulant medication, behavioral therapy, and school consultation services.

Fifty-one of these participants also received neurofeedback because their parent(s) decided to include it in their child's overall treatment plan. Participants in each group (i.e. multimodal treatment vs. multimodal treatment + neurofeedback) did not differ in the severity of symptoms before treatment began, and the treatment provided differed only by whether it included neurofeedback.

Twelve months later, participants whose treatment included neurofeedback showed greater improvement according to parent and teacher behavior ratings, and no longer demonstrated the brainwave patterns that were substantially different from children without ADHD. These gains remained evident a week after medication was discontinued and suggest that adding neurofeedback to a multimodal treatment program was associated with important incremental benefits. You can find a comprehensive review of this study at www.helpforadd.com/2003/january.htm.

In a second study (Fuchs et al., 2003), parents of 34 children with AD/HD between the ages of 8 and 12 chose either stimulant medication or neurofeedback treatment for their child. The majority - the parents of 22 children -- opted for neurofeedback treatment. After 3 months, children in both groups showed significant and comparable reductions in ADHD symptoms according to parents and teachers. Laboratory tests of attention also showed equivalent improvement. A comprehensive review of this study is available at www.helpforadd.com/2003/april.htm.

Clearly, children in both studies who received neurofeedback appeared to benefit from this treatment. Critics of these studies would correctly point out, however, that neither employed random assignment. The absence of random assignment makes it impossible to rule out other factors the groups may have differed on - besides whether they received neurofeedback - as an explanation for the results obtained. This limitation is found in virtually all studies of neurofeedback.

Another limitation is the failure to control for the substantial extra therapist attention provided to children who received neurofeedback treatment. It is possible that this extra attention - and not neurofeedback training per se - is what accounts for children's improvement. Although this strikes us unlikely given the intractability of ADHD symptoms to adult attention and support alone, it cannot be conclusively ruled out as an explanation.

** New Study of Neurofeedback for Treating ADHD **

A recently published study addresses one of these important concerns, i.e., the absence of random assignment, and also provides direct evidence of changes in brain activity for children receiving neurofeedback (Levesque, J., Beauregard, M., & Mensour, B. 2006. Effect of neurofeedback training on the neural substrates of selective attention in children with AD/HD: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 394, 216-221.)

Participants were 20 8-12-year-old children (4 girls and 16 boys) meeting DSM-IV criteria for ADHD; children who were also diagnosed with learning disabilities or a psychiatric diagnosis in addition to ADHD were excluded. Fifteen children were randomly assigned to receive 40 hour-long sessions of neurofeedback training conducted over a 13-week period. More children were assigned to the treatment group so that a greater number of treated subjects could participate in the fMRI procedure described below.

Consistent with what is known about EEG (i.e., brainwave) activity in individuals with ADHD, training focused on reducing the production of lower frequency theta waves and increasing the production of higher frequency waves that are associated with a more focused and attentive state. Control children received no active intervention, nor did they receive comparable amounts of adult attention. Although children in both groups had received stimulant medication treatment prior to the study, no child received medication during the study.

** STUDY MEASURES **

Both before and after neurofeedback training, the following measures were collected on participants in the treatment and control groups:

1) Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms;

2) Digit Span Test- This test requires children to repeat in correct order strings of digits that are read to them. The strings get increasingly longer until the child fails 2 trials in succession. After failing 2 successive trials, the test is repeated with children required to repeat the digits back in reverse order. Performance on this test depends on both attention and working memory skills.

3) Continuous Performance Test - This is a computerized test of sustained attention and the ability to inhibit impulsive responding. In this test, the child is presented with a series of auditory and visual stimuli via computer and must either respond or inhibit responding by pressing particular keys according to the stimulus that is presented. To well on this task, children need to sustain careful attention and refrain from pressing keys impulsively when the wrong stimulus is presented. This measure is widely used in the evaluation of attention difficulties.

4) Counting Stroop Task - This is a complex experimental task that involves both selective attention and the ability to inhibit a well-learned response. In this task, children are told that they will see sets of 1-4 identical words appear on the computer screen. Their job is to indicate how many words were presented by pressing a button the appropriate number of times.

On some trials, the words consisted of names of common animals, e.g., dog, cat, bird, etc.). For example, the word "cat" would appear 3 times and the child would need to press the button 3 times. If the word appeared only once, the child would press the button once. During these "neutral" trials, the task was thus relatively easy.

On other trials, however, referred to as "interference" trials, number words, e.g., "one", "two", "three", appeared on the screen. For example, the word "one" might be written 3 times, requiring the child to button press 3 times. This is a more difficult task, however, because the content of the word - the number one - conflicts with the number of button presses the child must make. Because what the child reads interferes with how he/she must respond, the processing required to do well on these trials is more complex than when neutral animal words are presented. Prior research has demonstrated that different brain areas are activated during these different types of trials. (Note - This is a variant of the more familiar color Stroop task, in which it is harder to name the color that words are printed in when the ink color is different from the word itself, e.g., when color words are written in green ink, it takes longer to say the ink is gren when the word written is "red" than when the word written is "green". You can try this for youself at http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/words.html

All children completed the Counting Stroop Task both before and after those in the experimental group received neurofeedback treatment. A total of 120 "neutral" and "interference" trials were conducted during each testing session and children's score was the number of trials they answered correctly.

An especially important feature of this study is that children received fMRI scans as while completing the Counting Stroop Task. FMRI is a technique for determining which parts of the brain are activated as individuals perform certain tasks by "imaging" the increased blood flow to the activated areas of the brain.

The inclusion of fMRI scans during the Counting Stroop Task enabled the researchers to examine results on this task in 2 ways. First, they could determine whether treated children performed better after treatment compared to the control group. And, second, they could determine via fMRI data whether patterns of brain activation during the task changed in neurofeedback treated children. Because neurofeedback is intended to change the underlying pattern of brain activity, demonstrating such a change is an important step in documenting the efficacy of this approach.

** RESULTS **

Results indicated clear improvements for children receiving neurofeedback treatment. Specifically, the authors reported the following:

1) For treated children, parent ratings of inattentive ADHD symptoms declined significantly - into the normal range - while those of control children remained clinically elevated.

2) For treated children, parent ratings of hyperactive/impulsive ADHD symptoms declined significantly - although not quite into the normal range - while those of control children showed a modest increase.

3) On the Digit Span test, scores for treated children increased significantly from time 1 to time 2; for control children, no significant increase was found.

4) On the Continuous Performance Test, scores for treated children increased significantly from time 1 to time 2; for control children, no significant increase was found.

5) On the Counting Stroop Task, treated children performed significantly better on both neutral and interference trials at time 2 compared to time 1; for control children, no increase in the accuracy of their performance was found.

6) FMRI results showed no difference in patterns of brain activation between treated and control children at time 1. At time 2, however, treated children showed a different pattern of brain activation during the interference trials, i.e., those that required more complex cognitive processing. The brain regions that were now activated were those believed to play important roles in selective attention and the suppression of inappropriate responses.

** SUMMARY and IMPLICATIONS **

This study provides important new evidence to support the use of neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD. Advantages over several previously published neurofeedback studies are that participants were randomly assigned to the treatment vs. control conditions and the inclusion of fMRI scans to document that neurofeedback treatment was associated with actual changes in brain activity during a complex cogntive task.

As with previously published studies, treatment was associated with a significant reduction in parent ratings of their child's ADHD symptoms. Because parents were not blind to condition, however, one can argue that this finding is confounded by parents' knowledge of whether or not their child received treatment. In other words, parents may have reported their child symptoms to improve simply because they expected this would happen and not because objective changes actually occurred.

Improvements for treated children in Digit Span and the Continuous Performance test - both considered to be objective assessments of attention and other cognitive skills - are not subject to this same criticsm, and thus provide a stronger basis for suggesting the neurofeedback treatment was helpful.

Most compelling of all, however, is the finding that neurofeedback treatment was associated with changes in brain activation detected by fMRI scans during the Counting Stoop Task. Proponents of neurofeedback treatment have long suggested that it produces enduring changes in brain functioning, and it is these changes that cause ADHD symptoms to diminish. Results from this study provide important initial evidence consistent with this hypothesis, although the absence of any long-term follow up makes it impossible to know whether the changes detected were transient or enduring.

While these results are encouraging, a balanced review of any study requires a discussion of it's limitations, and there are several to note. First, the sample size is relatively small and replicating the findings with a larger sample would be important.

Another limitation of the sample is that children with learning disabilities and diagnoses in addition to ADHD were excluded. Because many children with ADHD have one or more co-occurring conditions which can complicate treatment, it is not clear whether the results obtained would generalize to a broader and more representative sample of children with ADHD.

Third, the only behavior measure obtained fwas rom parents who were not blind to treatment condition. Because improving children's behavioral and academic functioning in school is an especially important goal of ADHD treatment, the absence of such information in this study is problematic; it should not be assumed that such changesin the classroom would have occurred. Finally, as the authors note, the control participants did not receive any attentional training intervention whatsoever. Thus, although it is tempting to conclude that specific training in changing brainwave activity was responsible for the treatment effects, including changes in the fMRI scans, this conclusion cannot be made with certainty.

For example, training a different pattern of EEG activity using neurofeedback, or an attention training intervention in which no direct feedback on EEG activity was provided, may have yielded similar results. One could even argue that the greater contact with researchers received by children in the treatment group - 40 hours vs. 0 for those in the control group - is what accounted for the treatment gains and that neurofeedback itself had nothing to do with it.

Although I do not find this to be a likely explanation, the study design does not enable this possibility to conclusively ruled out. In an ideal design, control children would go through a neurofeedback procedure that appeared identical to what treated children received, only the training would provide "sham" feedback that was not linked to their actual EEG activity. If group differences were found with this procedure it would be a clear indication that the specific EEG training received by experimental subjects, rather than any type of "placebo" effect, is what caused the improvements.

While these limitations are important to be aware of, the pattern of findings reported add to the increasing evidence base for using neurofeedback as a treatment for ADHD. While many experts would argue that additional studies are required to clearly demonstrate that this is an effective intervention - and I personally agree with this statement - it is also important to recognize that a number of studies provide converging evidence for the potential value of this approach.

I will continue to publish summaries of new studies in this interesting area in Attention Research Update as they become available.

Thanks again for your ongoing interest in the newsletter. I hope you enjoyed the above article and found it to be useful to you.

Sincerely,

David Rabiner, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Center for Child and Family Policy
Duke University

Dirección

Guatavita

Horario de Apertura

Lunes 7am - 7am
Viernes 7am - 7am

Página web

Notificaciones

Sé el primero en enterarse y déjanos enviarle un correo electrónico cuando Neurofeedback Bogotá publique noticias y promociones. Su dirección de correo electrónico no se utilizará para ningún otro fin, y puede darse de baja en cualquier momento.

Compartir

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest Share on Reddit Share via Email
Share on WhatsApp Share on Instagram Share on Telegram

Categoría