11/01/2026
As a professional, it’s important to separate visual rebranding and political narratives from actual nutrition science.
This “new” food pyramid is not a radical shift, nor is it a return to outdated models. Contrary to claims comparing it to the 2010 food pyramid, dietitians have largely moved away from that model for over a decade. Since 2011, we have been using MyPlate, which already incorporates many of the so-called “new” recommendations
What has changed is the visual communication. Visuals matter. Presenting the model as an upside-down pyramid is a strategic design choice meant to influence perception and engagement — not a change in nutritional fundamentals. So rather than debating whether it’s “new” or “old,” let’s look at what it gets right and where it falls short
✅ Positive points
• It correctly highlights the importance of adequate protein intake, which is often under-consumed, especially in older adults.
• It reinforces a focus on whole foods: fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fiber-rich choices. It also clearly states that frozen food is still OK, something that used to be considered taboo
❌ Limitations
• Protein emphasis is heavily animal-based, missing a clear opportunity to promote plant protein sources such as legumes, lentils, peas, and beans — foods strongly supported by evidence for cardiometabolic and gut health.
• Fiber recommendations are communicated as “servings,” which is not practical for the general public. A clearer, evidence-based target (≈ 20–30 g/day, depending on population) would be more actionable and educational.
