15/11/2022
Ja, kamille udtræk kan noget 😍
Næsespray på saltvand og kamille har vist sig effektiv i forsøg.
The topical use of herbs is a powerful and underestimated therapeutic option. Previously, as noted on this page, the use of licorice in a saline nasal spray was found to be effective for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Now a group of Turkish investigators aimed to demonstrate the effect of an isotonic seawater spray containing chamomile liquid extract on both symptoms and nasal mucociliary clearance in patients with allergic rhinitis, by comparing it with other isotonic seawater nasal washing solutions.
The study included 123 patients with allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate (a steroid) intranasal spray treatment was started for all patient groups. In addition to this treatment, isotonic seawater spray with chamomile liquid extract was added to Group A, isotonic seawater spray to Group B, and isotonic seawater nasal irrigation to Group C. The fourth group (Group D) was given only the nasal steroid spray without any nasal washing treatment. These extra washes for Groups A, B and C were used three times in each nostril twice daily for 4 weeks.
Before and after treatment in all patients, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 was performed, and nasal mucociliary clearance times were measured by the saccharin test. This simple test of nasal mucociliary clearance involves placing a small particle of saccharin approximately one cm behind the anterior end of the inferior turbinate. In the presence of normal mucociliary action, the saccharin will be swept backwards to the nasopharynx and a sweet taste is perceived.
In Groups A, B, C, and D the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 differences were statistically significantly improved from baseline. Only Groups A and B experienced a significant improvement in nasal mucociliary clearance times. When the Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 score and nasal mucociliary clearance time differences before and after treatment were compared across all groups, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 score difference was higher in Group A than for Groups B, C and D; these differences were found to be statistically significant (P = 0.010; P = 0.003; P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The nasal mucociliary clearance time difference was higher in Group A than for Groups C and D; again, these differences were statistically significant (P = 0.010; P = 0.001, respectively).
For more information see https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34142567/