27/05/2025
Is Maslow's hierarchy accurate? Abraham Maslow created a hierarchy of needs that outlines the different needs that humans have. He presented this using the shape of a pyramid. He claimed that each level needs to be fulfilled before moving up to the next level or having the desire to fulfill the next need. The lowest level represents physiological needs such as food. The next level is the need for safety. An example would be living in a safe area where there is no threat of physical harm. Job security is another form of safety as well. The third level is social. This is the need for human connection, love, and belonging. The fourth level is self-esteem. This is the need for status in the form of admiration and respect from others and ourselves. The final level at the top of the pyramid is self-actualization. This is all about reaching our full potential and living authentically in accordance with our values. There is also a sixth level that Maslow had theorized, but was ultimately left out of the hierarchy. That need is self-transcendence, which includes altruism in the form of helping a greater cause. It also refers to connection with humanity and the universe. “Transcendence refers to the very highest and most inclusive or holistic levels of human consciousness, behaving and relating, as ends rather than means, to oneself, to significant others, to human beings in general, to other species, to nature, and to the cosmos” — Abraham Maslow, Farther Reaches of Human Nature, New York (1971, p. 26). Although this hierarchy of needs is largely relevant, it isn't very accurate. Current researchers have found that this theory doesn't account for cultural differences and individual differences. It is also classist as it claims that people who don't fulfill their basic needs such as safety or a home can't access needs such as social needs or self-actualization. Perhaps we can think of the needs not as a pyramid, but as a diagram of interconnected needs.