03/07/2025
A LITTLE PHILOSOPHY AND A LITTLE BIOLOGY
A recent discussion on the Internet interested me. It was in a thread on a post in which a reporter opined that from his experience, despite all the horrible things we hear, most people in the world are decent people who just want to lead their lives in peace.
A commenter said yes, there are more good people in the world than bad, and good will always overcome evil.
Somebody replied to this comment by saying, unkindly, that the commenter was delusional. They implied that their thought on this was just a popular cliché. They talked about the evolution and genes. They referred to Richard Dawkins book, “The Selfish Gene”. They affirmed that people are programmed by their genes to act only in their own self-interest. Even actions that you might assume are benevolent always provide the actor with some payback, even if only the dopamine boost they feel when they do feel they have done a good deed. Because the human race is, no matter what, subject to the law of “survival of the fittest”.
There are two things that strike me about this exchange. The first is this: that this kind of debate lacks meaning unless we define our terms. What is “good”? What is “bad”? (In the moral sense.) Are these the kind of questions the answer to which is, “If you have to ask, you wouldn’t understand the answer”? I don’t think so. It isn’t so straightforward as one might think. For instance, what do militant Islamists, Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump and the Pope (any pope) have in common? It is that some people believe they are doing God’s work, while others think that they are evil people. What about a “good person” and a “bad person” then? Do we judge a “nice” person to be a “good” person, and one who is “not nice” a bad person? Do we not all think and do things which we might even ourselves judge to be good or bad? People are complex. Do not the dark and the light co-exist in every one of us?
The second thing is this: if you are going to try to validate your own view by referring to a scientific theory, make sure you actually know the theory. The second commenter above, while portraying himself as intellectually superior to the first one, didn't. Although Dawkin’s book has a snappy title, it is metaphorical, not literal. A gene is a chemical molecule, nothing more nor less. Genes have no free will, they cannot be selfish. Their power and the implications of that power cannot be regarded in terms of moral judgements. Because of their biochemical activity, genes confer upon their holder certain characteristics, whether those be physical or mental. A certain genetic make-up, together with their upbringing and environment, can make a person relatively selfish, and another can make a person relatively selfless. But then, it really isn’t about the survival or success of the individual, but about the evolutionary success of the whole population or species. And furthermore, it isn’t the genes which decide to battle it out with each other (remember - they have no will of their own), it is environmental conditions which decide which of them are most useful. At a certain time in a certain place altruism might be favoured because it serves the population better; in another place at another time, individualism may be on the whole the best strategy for the species to thrive. And the human species needs both kinds of person within it so that it can adapt to changing circumstances. That is the theory.
If that is indeed how it works, in the grand scheme of things it makes no sense to consider selflessness “good” in and of itself, and “selfishness” bad (the usual scheme), and the one will never vanquish the other, because both are necessary, within reason. That is, so long as there are not too many people at the extremes of the scale in either direction.
I will go beyond biology now and suggest that on a metaphysical level there will always be a vital tension between two opposites (like "good" and "bad"), and that one will never overcome the other and reign supreme for ever and ever. At least not in this world.
[Image from https://mwtb.org/pages/bad-or-good?srsltid=AfmBOorEas8UvwGZyPh2KW3UstV2k2xtEeMmpdWHWbVFn79896LNQid5]