22/11/2025
How do forces travel through a mountain bike?
It starts with the front wheel, and every part of the bike acts as a filter on the signal on the way to the rider.
These plots show the vertical accelerations measured at the front axle, rear axle, frame (bottom bracket) and bars. The front axle, rear axle and frame are what I refer to as the “three axles”, which combine to make that bikes specific fingerprint. The bars are our metric for adding context to rider feedback.
1. Front axle → bars & frame
The signal spreads out and becomes more chaotic — this is what the rider feels most clearly and will likely be how they communicate their sensations.
2. Rear axle → bars & frame
The force path is narrower and more predictable.
The rear wheel is doing a different job: stability & drive.
3. Front axle vs rear axle
Even on the same bumps, the wheels experience different loads, different timing, and different frequencies.
The front wheel sees the terrain with less filtering, whereas the rear sees the result of:
– pitch
– weight transfer
– wheel path differences
– suspension movement
– braking load
The important bit to note - Impact forces don’t move straight up the bike.
They are subject to transformation, where each stage of the bike filters, delays, shapes and/or amplifies what the rider feels.
This is why front and rear setup have different requirements, as a result of chassis dynamics, timing, and the live load on top (the rider).
These plots show a variety of trails from a world cup track to a blue flow trail, a world cup rider to capable amateur and a carbon chassis to an aluminium one. There are about as many variables in these three examples as possible. Usually we aim to reduce the variables but for this case study, a wide range makes for better examples.