18/11/2025
Institutional Misrecognition: The ME/CFS Debate as Relational Trauma
The decades-long nosological war over Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), fought between psychogenic and biomedical models, represents more than a sterile academic dispute; it is a systemic iatrogenic enactment. This essay argues that the very binary in which the debate is trapped constitutes the primary relational trauma for the patient, functioning as a societal psychic retreat from the clinical encounter with profound bodily suffering in the absence of a simple, unifying biomarker. Deploying a relational psychoanalytic lens, amplified by the richly phenomenological framework of the 2003 Canadian Clinical Definition, this analysis re-reads the diagnostic labyrinth not as a failure to find a lesion, but as a failure of medicine's capacity for what D.W. Winnicott termed a ‘holding environment’. The psychogenic attribution, particularly as codified in treatments like Graded Exercise Therapy (GET), is revealed as a defensive manoeuvre against clinical uncertainty, a re-traumatising invalidation that positions the patient's cry for help as the pathology itself. Consequently, this paper posits that relational psychoanalysis offers not merely an adjunct to future biomedical therapy but a crucial hermeneutic for understanding the present traumatogenic discourse. By bearing witness to the patient’s experience of being caught within this dissociative cleavage and by analysing the enactment itself, a relational approach can begin to repair the profound psychic damage inflicted by institutional misrecognition....
The decades-long nosological war over Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), fought between psychogenic and biomedical models, represents more than a sterile academic dispute;…