
04/01/2021
Doctors spend forty years practising medicine, with very little formal education after their initial training. Pharmaceutical companies spend tens of billions of pounds every year trying to change the treatment decisions of doctors, who are bombarded with information: from industry adverts, sales reps, and colleagues who have received 'teachings’ that are sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry itself.
With medicines being tested by the very people who manufacture them, the results analysed using techniques which manipulate the findings to exaggerate their benefits, the whole of modern medical knowledge being undermined. This unbalanced science is written into doctors' curriculums, medical textbooks and treatment guidelines, all from a profit driven bias source, which is legally allowed to suppress any negative findings.
It is entirely normal for researchers and academics to sign contracts subjecting them to gagging clauses, which forbids them to publish, discuss or analyze data from the trails that have conducted. Data is withheld from everyone in medicine, from the top to the bottom, as there is no legal obligation to disclose negative, even dangerous results.
NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical excellence) for example, created to conduct careful, unbiased summaries of new treatments is unable to either identify or access data that’s been withheld on a medicine's effectiveness. NICE has no more legal right to the information as do you or I even though it is making decisions on behalf of the NHS and millions of people.
The MHRA, are the regulators who oversee the approval of medicines in the UK often have access to this data yet do not share it with patients, doctors or with NICE. The MHRA is the first in the world to approve the COVID jab, the approval process falls to just one person in a room assessing whatever data a drug company submits, this easily corruptable process is leaving British people shockingly exposed to undisclosed side risks.