15/02/2026
Let's get this clear: we have all been saying that HA holds (or binds, traps, absorbs, can absorb, etc.) 1000 times its weight in water.
The number sounds impressive, Joanne Avison and I got to talking about how such impressive stats are often just. not. true.
In this case, the truth is extraordinarily different. So much so, we have found it to be the learning opportunity of the year so far: HA chemically binds closer to *twice* its own weight in water.
Two times its weight is still a huge amount for a molecule to hold!
The rest of the story is as monumental as it sounds; it's the difference between twice and 1k times. That's a lot of difference.
Nerding out on how this exaggeration became common led us to a much deeper understanding, and that felt important to share... especially the question of what actually happens to the remaining 998 grams (99.8%) of water.
So here is a different picture ⟡
Imagine HA not as a sponge, but as a vast orchard tree in winter.
The trunk and branches are the molecule itself. On those branches, only a few small lanterns are firmly clipped on.
Those lanterns represent the water that is truly chemically bound (ie, trapped, absorbed, held, insert any of the verb phrasing we see in the modern HA literature).
There are only a couple of them (lanterns, the water molecules in this analogy) for every unit of HA. They are attached directly and will not readily detach.
Now imagine a thick morning fog settling into the entire shape of the tree. The fog fills every gap between branches. It occupies the canopy.
It wraps the silhouette of the tree(s).
That fog is not clipped onto anything, not glued to the bark. It is simply held in place because the branching architecture gives it somewhere to gather.
Out of what we call 1000 times its weight in water, only about 2 parts are the lanterns actually clipped onto the branches. That is about 0.2 percent.
The remaining 99.8 percent is the fog occupying the space created by the branching structure.
In a laboratory, in the test tube context, you could shake much of that fog loose.
In living tissue, though, there is no single tree standing alone. There is a whole forest ∞ collagen fibers, proteoglycans, cells, woven fascial planes & interfaces.
The fog is not chemically attached to each trunk, nor is it free sky. It is shaped by the *architecture of the entire forest*.
This is where things become fascinating for fascia practitioners ⟢
That so-called spare 998 grams of water, in the body, ***can't*** be bulk water at all.
Near hydrophilic biological surfaces, water tends to organize itself into more ordered layers. Hello and respectful nod to Professor Gerald Pollack. Here, water behaves more like a soft atmospheric field than random droplets.
It becomes structured, influenced, and *patterned* by the surfaces around it.
So HA does not act like a superabsorbent towel, holding a thousand times its weight by chemical force.
The cosmetics marketing department was spinning the truth super hard there, and my aim is to get fascia research back to primary sources:
Laurent, Comper, Balazs, and Cowman (the OGs of HA) were describing how an HA coil in dilute solution occupies a volume containing ~1000× its mass of solvent. Almost all of that is just water within the excluded volume of the polymer, the “fog in the tree,” not water chemically glued to HA.
You'll find these references in this blog post if you care to go deeper into the forest.
Because HA functions more like a branching form that provides water with a place to assemble. The architecture creates the condition... the water follows the form.
For us, the shift from repeating the headline number to understanding the underlying architecture has been a small but meaningful recalibration.
NOT to betray or belittle anyone, just to set the alignment back to primary sources.
Telling the story of how we may have fallen for the spin is a way back to the forest... a deeper look into that fascial forest and into the fog that gathers within it ✺
Go deeper here:
That famous claim about hyaluronic acid (HA) binding 1,000 times its weight in water? Sorry to be the burster of bubbles here. Sure, HA is a water-binding superstar, but that specific "1,000×" number? That's mostly marketing magic from the cosmetics and materials marketing world, not actual science...